From: "Yang Shi" <yang.s@alibaba-inc.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm: oom: show unreclaimable slab info when kernel panic
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2017 23:44:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e0812074-0b4f-bba1-ccea-a82c9312da44@alibaba-inc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171002072607.sjikpsoaiyebmukd@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On 10/2/17 12:26 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 28-09-17 01:25:50, Yang Shi wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9/27/17 3:45 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Wed 27-09-17 08:53:35, Yang Shi wrote:
>>>> Kernel may panic when oom happens without killable process sometimes it
>>>> is caused by huge unreclaimable slabs used by kernel.
>>>>
>>>> Although kdump could help debug such problem, however, kdump is not
>>>> available on all architectures and it might be malfunction sometime.
>>>> And, since kernel already panic it is worthy capturing such information
>>>> in dmesg to aid touble shooting.
>>>>
>>>> Print out unreclaimable slab info (used size and total size) which
>>>> actual memory usage is not zero (num_objs * size != 0) when:
>>>> - unreclaimable slabs : all user memory > unreclaim_slabs_oom_ratio
>>>> - panic_on_oom is set or no killable process
>>>
>>> OK, this is better but I do not see why this should be tunable via proc.
>>
>> Just thought someone might want to dump unreclaimable slab info
>> unconditionally.
>
> If that ever happens then we will eventually add it. But do not add proc
> knobs for theoretical usecases. We will have to maintain them and it
> can turn into a maint. pain. Like some others in the past.
It has been removed since v8. Currently the only condition is
unreclaimable slabs > user memory.
Thanks,
Yang
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-02 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-27 0:53 [PATCH 0/3 v7] oom: capture unreclaimable slab info in oom message " Yang Shi
2017-09-27 0:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] tools: slabinfo: add "-U" option to show unreclaimable slabs only Yang Shi
2017-09-27 0:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: oom: show unreclaimable slab info when kernel panic Yang Shi
2017-09-27 7:14 ` Christopher Lameter
2017-09-27 17:21 ` Yang Shi
2017-09-27 21:59 ` Christopher Lameter
2017-09-27 22:11 ` Yang Shi
2017-10-01 6:43 ` Christopher Lameter
2017-10-02 15:44 ` Yang Shi
2017-09-27 10:45 ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-27 17:25 ` Yang Shi
2017-10-02 7:26 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-02 15:44 ` Yang Shi [this message]
2017-09-27 0:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] doc: add description for unreclaim_slabs_oom_ratio Yang Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e0812074-0b4f-bba1-ccea-a82c9312da44@alibaba-inc.com \
--to=yang.s@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox