From: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
To: Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, chenhuacai@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
anup@brainfault.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com,
palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, seanjc@google.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org,
willy@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
xiaoyao.li@intel.com, yilun.xu@intel.com,
chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, jarkko@kernel.org,
amoorthy@google.com, dmatlack@google.com,
isaku.yamahata@intel.com, mic@digikod.net, vbabka@suse.cz,
vannapurve@google.com, mail@maciej.szmigiero.name,
david@redhat.com, michael.roth@amd.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com,
liam.merwick@oracle.com, isaku.yamahata@gmail.com,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
steven.price@arm.com, quic_eberman@quicinc.com,
quic_mnalajal@quicinc.com, quic_tsoni@quicinc.com,
quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com, quic_cvanscha@quicinc.com,
quic_pderrin@quicinc.com, quic_pheragu@quicinc.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev, maz@kernel.org,
will@kernel.org, qperret@google.com, keirf@google.com,
roypat@amazon.co.uk, shuah@kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
jgg@nvidia.com, rientjes@google.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
fvdl@google.com, hughd@google.com, jthoughton@google.com,
peterx@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/9] KVM: guest_memfd: Allow host to map guest_memfd() pages
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 15:44:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <diqzzfgn4oxy.fsf@ackerleytng-ctop.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d5942725-2789-4626-bee1-81d69ed794f8@amd.com>
Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com> writes:
> On 4/8/2025 10:28 PM, Ackerley Tng wrote:
>> Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com> writes:
>>
>>> Hi Fuad,
>>>
>>> On 3/18/2025 9:48 PM, Fuad Tabba wrote:
>>>> Add support for mmap() and fault() for guest_memfd backed memory
>>>> in the host for VMs that support in-place conversion between
>>>> shared and private. To that end, this patch adds the ability to
>>>> check whether the VM type supports in-place conversion, and only
>>>> allows mapping its memory if that's the case.
>>>>
>>>> Also add the KVM capability KVM_CAP_GMEM_SHARED_MEM, which
>>>> indicates that the VM supports shared memory in guest_memfd, or
>>>> that the host can create VMs that support shared memory.
>>>> Supporting shared memory implies that memory can be mapped when
>>>> shared with the host.
>>>>
>>>> This is controlled by the KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM configuration
>>>> option.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
>>>
>>> ...
>>> ...
>>>> +
>>>> +static int kvm_gmem_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct kvm_gmem *gmem = file->private_data;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!kvm_arch_gmem_supports_shared_mem(gmem->kvm))
>>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>>> +
>>>> + if ((vma->vm_flags & (VM_SHARED | VM_MAYSHARE)) !=
>>>> + (VM_SHARED | VM_MAYSHARE)) {
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + file_accessed(file);
>>>
>>> As it is not directly visible to userspace, do we need to update the
>>> file's access time via file_accessed()?
>>>
>>
>> Could you explain a little more about this being directly visible to
>> userspace?
>>
>> IIUC generic_fillattr(), which guest_memfd uses, will fill stat->atime
>> from the inode's atime. file_accessed() will update atime and so this
>> should be userspace accessible. (Unless I missed something along the way
>> that blocks the update)
>>
>
> By visibility to userspace, I meant that guest_memfd is in-memory and not
> directly exposed to users as a traditional file would be.
shmem is also in-memory and uses updates atime, so I guess being
in-memory doesn't mean we shouldn't update atime.
guest_memfd is not quite traditional, but would the mmap patches Fuad is
working on now qualify the guest_memfd as more traditional?
>
> Yes, theoretically atime is accessible to user, but is it actually useful for
> guest_memfd, and do users track atime in this context? In my understanding,
> this might be an unnecessary unless we want to maintain it for VFS consistency.
>
> My analysis of the call flow:
> fstat() -> vfs_fstat() -> vfs_getattr() -> vfs_getattr_nosec() -> kvm_gmem_getattr()
> I couldn't find any kernel-side consumers of inode's atime or instances where
> it's being used for any internal purposes.
>
> Searching for examples, I found secretmem_mmap() skips file_accessed().
>
I guess I'm okay both ways, I don't think I have a use case for reading
atime, but I assumed VFS consistency is a good thing.
>
> Also as side note, I believe the kvm_gmem_getattr() ops implementation
> might be unnecessary here.
> Since kvm_gmem_getattr() is simply calling generic_fillattr() without
> any special handling, couldn't we just use the default implementation?
>
> int vfs_getattr_nosec(const struct path *path, struct kstat *stat,
> u32 request_mask, unsigned int query_flags)
> {
> ...
> if (inode->i_op->getattr)
> return inode->i_op->getattr(idmap, path, stat,
> request_mask,
> query_flags);
>
> generic_fillattr(idmap, request_mask, inode, stat);
> return 0;
> }
I noticed this too. I agree that we could actually just use
generic_fillattr() by not specifying ->getattr().
>
> I might be missing some context. Please feel free to correct me
> if I've misunderstood anything.
>
> Thanks,
> Shivank
>
>>>> + vm_flags_set(vma, VM_DONTDUMP);
>>>> + vma->vm_ops = &kvm_gmem_vm_ops;
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +#else
>>>> +#define kvm_gmem_mmap NULL
>>>> +#endif /* CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM */
>>>> +
>>>> static struct file_operations kvm_gmem_fops = {
>>>> + .mmap = kvm_gmem_mmap,
>>>> .open = generic_file_open,
>>>> .release = kvm_gmem_release,
>>>> .fallocate = kvm_gmem_fallocate,
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Shivank
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-10 22:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-18 16:18 [PATCH v7 0/9] KVM: Mapping guest_memfd backed memory at the host for software protected VMs Fuad Tabba
2025-03-18 16:18 ` [PATCH v7 1/9] mm: Consolidate freeing of typed folios on final folio_put() Fuad Tabba
2025-04-14 10:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-14 10:15 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-03-18 16:18 ` [PATCH v7 2/9] KVM: guest_memfd: Handle final folio_put() of guest_memfd pages Fuad Tabba
2025-04-14 10:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-18 16:18 ` [PATCH v7 3/9] KVM: guest_memfd: Allow host to map guest_memfd() pages Fuad Tabba
2025-04-08 12:04 ` Shivank Garg
2025-04-08 13:17 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-04-08 16:58 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-04-09 7:17 ` Shivank Garg
2025-04-10 22:44 ` Ackerley Tng [this message]
2025-04-11 10:34 ` Shivank Garg
2025-04-14 10:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-14 10:15 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-03-18 16:18 ` [PATCH v7 4/9] KVM: guest_memfd: Handle in-place shared memory as guest_memfd backed memory Fuad Tabba
2025-04-14 11:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-14 16:03 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-04-14 19:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-15 13:51 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-04-15 17:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-14 18:07 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-04-14 20:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-15 21:50 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-04-16 12:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-16 12:30 ` Patrick Roy
2025-04-16 12:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-18 16:18 ` [PATCH v7 5/9] KVM: x86: Mark KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM as supporting guest_memfd shared memory Fuad Tabba
2025-03-26 14:42 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-18 16:18 ` [PATCH v7 6/9] KVM: arm64: Refactor user_mem_abort() calculation of force_pte Fuad Tabba
2025-03-18 16:18 ` [PATCH v7 7/9] KVM: arm64: Handle guest_memfd()-backed guest page faults Fuad Tabba
2025-03-18 16:18 ` [PATCH v7 8/9] KVM: arm64: Enable mapping guest_memfd in arm64 Fuad Tabba
2025-03-18 16:18 ` [PATCH v7 9/9] KVM: guest_memfd: selftests: guest_memfd mmap() test when mapping is allowed Fuad Tabba
2025-04-01 17:25 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-04-02 8:56 ` Fuad Tabba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=diqzzfgn4oxy.fsf@ackerleytng-ctop.c.googlers.com \
--to=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amoorthy@google.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=fvdl@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=keirf@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liam.merwick@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=quic_cvanscha@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_eberman@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_mnalajal@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_pderrin@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_pheragu@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_tsoni@quicinc.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roypat@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shivankg@amd.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox