From: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
To: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, chenhuacai@kernel.org,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, anup@brainfault.org,
paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, seanjc@google.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org,
willy@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
xiaoyao.li@intel.com, yilun.xu@intel.com,
chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, jarkko@kernel.org,
amoorthy@google.com, dmatlack@google.com,
yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com, isaku.yamahata@intel.com,
mic@digikod.net, vbabka@suse.cz, vannapurve@google.com,
mail@maciej.szmigiero.name, david@redhat.com,
michael.roth@amd.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com,
liam.merwick@oracle.com, isaku.yamahata@gmail.com,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
steven.price@arm.com, quic_eberman@quicinc.com,
quic_mnalajal@quicinc.com, quic_tsoni@quicinc.com,
quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com, quic_cvanscha@quicinc.com,
quic_pderrin@quicinc.com, quic_pheragu@quicinc.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev, maz@kernel.org,
will@kernel.org, qperret@google.com, keirf@google.com,
roypat@amazon.co.uk, shuah@kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
jgg@nvidia.com, rientjes@google.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
fvdl@google.com, hughd@google.com, jthoughton@google.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/14] KVM: Restricted mapping of guest_memfd at the host and arm64 support
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:35:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <diqzh65zzjc9.fsf@ackerleytng-ctop.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+EHjTzcx=eXSERSANMByhcgRRAbUL3kPAYkeu-uUgd0nPBPPA@mail.gmail.com> (message from Fuad Tabba on Thu, 9 Jan 2025 16:34:42 +0000)
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> As mentioned in the guest_memfd sync (2025-01-09), below is the state
> diagram that uses the new states in this patch series, and how they
> would interact with sharing/unsharing in pKVM:
>
> https://lpc.events/event/18/contributions/1758/attachments/1457/3699/Guestmemfd%20folio%20state%20page_type.pdf
Thanks Fuad!
I took a look at the state diagram [1] and the branch that this patch is
on [2], and here's what I understand about the flow:
1. From state H in the state diagram, the guest can request to unshare a
page. When KVM handles this unsharing, KVM marks the folio
mappability as NONE (state J).
2. The transition from state J to state K or I is independent of KVM -
userspace has to do this unmapping
3. On the next vcpu_run() from userspace, continuing from userspace's
handling of the unshare request, guest_memfd will check and try to
register a callback if the folio's mappability is NONE. If the folio
is mapped, or if folio is not mapped but refcount is elevated for
whatever reason, vcpu_run() fails and exits to userspace. If folio is
not mapped and gmem holds the last refcount, set folio mappability to
GUEST.
Here's one issue I see based on the above understanding:
Registration of the folio_put() callback only happens if the VMM
actually tries to do vcpu_run(). For 4K folios I think this is okay
since the 4K folio can be freed via the transition state K -> state I,
but for hugetlb folios that have been split for sharing with userspace,
not getting a folio_put() callback means never putting the hugetlb folio
together. Hence, relying on vcpu_run() to add the folio_put() callback
leaves a way that hugetlb pages can be removed from the system.
I think we should try and find a path forward that works for both 4K and
hugetlb folios.
IIUC page._mapcount and page.page_type works as a union because
page_type is only set for page types that are never mapped to userspace,
like PGTY_slab, PGTY_offline, etc.
Technically PGTY_guest_memfd is only set once the page can never be
mapped to userspace, but PGTY_guest_memfd can only be set once mapcount
reaches 0. Since mapcount is added in the faulting process, could gmem
perhaps use some kind of .unmap/.unfault callback, so that gmem gets
notified of all unmaps and will know for sure that the mapcount gets to
0?
Alternatively, I took a look at the folio_is_zone_device()
implementation, and page.flags is used to identify the page's type. IIUC
a ZONE_DEVICE page also falls in the intersection of needing a
folio_put() callback and can be mapped to userspace. Could we use a
similar approach, using page.flags to identify a page as a guest_memfd
page? That way we don't need to know when unmapping happens, and will
always be able to get a folio_put() callback.
[1] https://lpc.events/event/18/contributions/1758/attachments/1457/3699/Guestmemfd%20folio%20state%20page_type.pdf
[2] https://android-kvm.googlesource.com/linux/+/764360863785ba16d974253a572c87abdd9fdf0b%5E%21/#F0
> This patch series doesn't necessarily impose all these transitions,
> many of them would be a matter of policy. This just happens to be the
> current way I've done it with pKVM/arm64.
>
> Cheers,
> /fuad
>
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 at 16:48, Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> This series adds restricted mmap() support to guest_memfd, as
>> well as support for guest_memfd on arm64. It is based on Linux
>> 6.13-rc2. Please refer to v3 for the context [1].
>>
>> Main changes since v3:
>> - Added a new folio type for guestmem, used to register a
>> callback when a folio's reference count reaches 0 (Matthew
>> Wilcox, DavidH) [2]
>> - Introduce new mappability states for folios, where a folio can
>> be mappable by the host and the guest, only the guest, or by no
>> one (transient state)
>> - Rebased on Linux 6.13-rc2
>> - Refactoring and tidying up
>>
>> Cheers,
>> /fuad
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241010085930.1546800-1-tabba@google.com/
>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241108162040.159038-1-tabba@google.com/
>>
>> Ackerley Tng (2):
>> KVM: guest_memfd: Make guest mem use guest mem inodes instead of
>> anonymous inodes
>> KVM: guest_memfd: Track mappability within a struct kvm_gmem_private
>>
>> Fuad Tabba (12):
>> mm: Consolidate freeing of typed folios on final folio_put()
>> KVM: guest_memfd: Introduce kvm_gmem_get_pfn_locked(), which retains
>> the folio lock
>> KVM: guest_memfd: Folio mappability states and functions that manage
>> their transition
>> KVM: guest_memfd: Handle final folio_put() of guestmem pages
>> KVM: guest_memfd: Allow host to mmap guest_memfd() pages when shared
>> KVM: guest_memfd: Add guest_memfd support to
>> kvm_(read|/write)_guest_page()
>> KVM: guest_memfd: Add KVM capability to check if guest_memfd is host
>> mappable
>> KVM: guest_memfd: Add a guest_memfd() flag to initialize it as
>> mappable
>> KVM: guest_memfd: selftests: guest_memfd mmap() test when mapping is
>> allowed
>> KVM: arm64: Skip VMA checks for slots without userspace address
>> KVM: arm64: Handle guest_memfd()-backed guest page faults
>> KVM: arm64: Enable guest_memfd private memory when pKVM is enabled
>>
>> Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 4 +
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 +
>> arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 119 +++-
>> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 75 +++
>> include/linux/page-flags.h | 22 +
>> include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 2 +
>> include/uapi/linux/magic.h | 1 +
>> mm/debug.c | 1 +
>> mm/swap.c | 28 +-
>> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
>> .../testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c | 64 +-
>> virt/kvm/Kconfig | 4 +
>> virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c | 579 +++++++++++++++++-
>> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 229 ++++++-
>> 15 files changed, 1074 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>> base-commit: fac04efc5c793dccbd07e2d59af9f90b7fc0dca4
>> --
>> 2.47.1.613.gc27f4b7a9f-goog
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-16 0:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-13 16:47 Fuad Tabba
2024-12-13 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/14] mm: Consolidate freeing of typed folios on final folio_put() Fuad Tabba
2024-12-13 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/14] KVM: guest_memfd: Make guest mem use guest mem inodes instead of anonymous inodes Fuad Tabba
2024-12-13 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/14] KVM: guest_memfd: Introduce kvm_gmem_get_pfn_locked(), which retains the folio lock Fuad Tabba
2024-12-13 16:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/14] KVM: guest_memfd: Track mappability within a struct kvm_gmem_private Fuad Tabba
2024-12-13 16:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/14] KVM: guest_memfd: Folio mappability states and functions that manage their transition Fuad Tabba
2024-12-13 16:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/14] KVM: guest_memfd: Handle final folio_put() of guestmem pages Fuad Tabba
2024-12-13 16:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/14] KVM: guest_memfd: Allow host to mmap guest_memfd() pages when shared Fuad Tabba
2024-12-27 4:21 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-01-09 10:17 ` Fuad Tabba
2024-12-13 16:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/14] KVM: guest_memfd: Add guest_memfd support to kvm_(read|/write)_guest_page() Fuad Tabba
2024-12-13 16:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/14] KVM: guest_memfd: Add KVM capability to check if guest_memfd is host mappable Fuad Tabba
2024-12-13 16:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/14] KVM: guest_memfd: Add a guest_memfd() flag to initialize it as mappable Fuad Tabba
2024-12-13 16:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/14] KVM: guest_memfd: selftests: guest_memfd mmap() test when mapping is allowed Fuad Tabba
2024-12-13 16:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/14] KVM: arm64: Skip VMA checks for slots without userspace address Fuad Tabba
2024-12-13 16:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/14] KVM: arm64: Handle guest_memfd()-backed guest page faults Fuad Tabba
2025-01-16 14:48 ` Patrick Roy
2025-01-16 15:16 ` Fuad Tabba
2024-12-13 16:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 14/14] KVM: arm64: Enable guest_memfd private memory when pKVM is enabled Fuad Tabba
2025-01-09 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v4 00/14] KVM: Restricted mapping of guest_memfd at the host and arm64 support Fuad Tabba
2025-01-16 0:35 ` Ackerley Tng [this message]
2025-01-16 9:19 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-01-20 9:26 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-01-20 9:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-16 14:48 ` Patrick Roy
2025-01-16 15:02 ` Fuad Tabba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=diqzh65zzjc9.fsf@ackerleytng-ctop.c.googlers.com \
--to=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amoorthy@google.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=fvdl@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=keirf@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liam.merwick@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=quic_cvanscha@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_eberman@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_mnalajal@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_pderrin@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_pheragu@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_tsoni@quicinc.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roypat@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
--cc=yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox