From: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
To: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, chenhuacai@kernel.org,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, anup@brainfault.org,
paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, seanjc@google.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org,
willy@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
xiaoyao.li@intel.com, yilun.xu@intel.com,
chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, jarkko@kernel.org,
amoorthy@google.com, dmatlack@google.com,
isaku.yamahata@intel.com, mic@digikod.net, vbabka@suse.cz,
vannapurve@google.com, mail@maciej.szmigiero.name,
david@redhat.com, michael.roth@amd.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com,
liam.merwick@oracle.com, isaku.yamahata@gmail.com,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
steven.price@arm.com, quic_eberman@quicinc.com,
quic_mnalajal@quicinc.com, quic_tsoni@quicinc.com,
quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com, quic_cvanscha@quicinc.com,
quic_pderrin@quicinc.com, quic_pheragu@quicinc.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev, maz@kernel.org,
will@kernel.org, qperret@google.com, keirf@google.com,
roypat@amazon.co.uk, shuah@kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
jgg@nvidia.com, rientjes@google.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
fvdl@google.com, hughd@google.com, jthoughton@google.com,
peterx@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/9] KVM: guest_memfd: Handle final folio_put() of guest_memfd pages
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 14:23:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <diqz4j01t15e.fsf@ackerleytng-ctop.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+EHjTxhumDswVVosDtvMojk-MJbJT=V8Cxhhnw2GGUDL74Mmw@mail.gmail.com>
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> writes:
> Hi Ackerley,
>
> On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 at 17:04, Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> writes:
>>
>> > Before transitioning a guest_memfd folio to unshared, thereby
>> > disallowing access by the host and allowing the hypervisor to
>> > transition its view of the guest page as private, we need to be
>> > sure that the host doesn't have any references to the folio.
>> >
>> > This patch introduces a new type for guest_memfd folios, which
>> > isn't activated in this series but is here as a placeholder and
>> > to facilitate the code in the subsequent patch series. This will
>> > be used in the future to register a callback that informs the
>> > guest_memfd subsystem when the last reference is dropped,
>> > therefore knowing that the host doesn't have any remaining
>> > references.
>> >
>> > This patch also introduces the configuration option,
>> > KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM, which toggles support for mapping
>> > guest_memfd shared memory at the host.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
>> > Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
>> > Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>> > ---
>> > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 7 +++++++
>> > include/linux/page-flags.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>> > mm/debug.c | 1 +
>> > mm/swap.c | 9 +++++++++
>> > virt/kvm/Kconfig | 5 +++++
>> > 5 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
>> > index f34f4cfaa513..7788e3625f6d 100644
>> > --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
>> > +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
>> > @@ -2571,4 +2571,11 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_pre_fault_memory(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> > struct kvm_pre_fault_memory *range);
>> > #endif
>> >
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM
>> > +static inline void kvm_gmem_handle_folio_put(struct folio *folio)
>> > +{
>> > + WARN_ONCE(1, "A placeholder that shouldn't trigger. Work in progress.");
>> > +}
>> > +#endif
>> > +
>> > #endif
>>
>> Following up with the discussion at the guest_memfd biweekly call on the
>> guestmem library, I think this folio_put() handler for guest_memfd could
>> be the first function that's refactored out into (placeholder name)
>> mm/guestmem.c.
>>
>> This folio_put() handler has to stay in memory even after KVM (as a
>> module) is unloaded from memory, and so it is a good candidate for the
>> first function in the guestmem library.
>>
>> Along those lines, CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM in this patch can be
>> renamed CONFIG_GUESTMEM, and CONFIG_GUESTMEM will guard the existence of
>> PGTY_guestmem.
>>
>> CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM can be introduced in the next patch of this
>> series, which could, in Kconfig, select CONFIG_GUESTMEM.
>>
>> > diff --git a/include/linux/page-flags.h b/include/linux/page-flags.h
>> > index 6dc2494bd002..daeee9a38e4c 100644
>> > --- a/include/linux/page-flags.h
>> > +++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h
>> > @@ -933,6 +933,7 @@ enum pagetype {
>> > PGTY_slab = 0xf5,
>> > PGTY_zsmalloc = 0xf6,
>> > PGTY_unaccepted = 0xf7,
>> > + PGTY_guestmem = 0xf8,
>> >
>> > PGTY_mapcount_underflow = 0xff
>> > };
>> > @@ -1082,6 +1083,21 @@ FOLIO_TYPE_OPS(hugetlb, hugetlb)
>> > FOLIO_TEST_FLAG_FALSE(hugetlb)
>> > #endif
>> >
>> > +/*
>> > + * guestmem folios are used to back VM memory as managed by guest_memfd. Once
>> > + * the last reference is put, instead of freeing these folios back to the page
>> > + * allocator, they are returned to guest_memfd.
>> > + *
>> > + * For now, guestmem will only be set on these folios as long as they cannot be
>> > + * mapped to user space ("private state"), with the plan of always setting that
>> > + * type once typed folios can be mapped to user space cleanly.
>> > + */
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM
>> > +FOLIO_TYPE_OPS(guestmem, guestmem)
>> > +#else
>> > +FOLIO_TEST_FLAG_FALSE(guestmem)
>> > +#endif
>> > +
>> > PAGE_TYPE_OPS(Zsmalloc, zsmalloc, zsmalloc)
>> >
>> > /*
>> > diff --git a/mm/debug.c b/mm/debug.c
>> > index 8d2acf432385..08bc42c6cba8 100644
>> > --- a/mm/debug.c
>> > +++ b/mm/debug.c
>> > @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ static const char *page_type_names[] = {
>> > DEF_PAGETYPE_NAME(table),
>> > DEF_PAGETYPE_NAME(buddy),
>> > DEF_PAGETYPE_NAME(unaccepted),
>> > + DEF_PAGETYPE_NAME(guestmem),
>> > };
>> >
>> > static const char *page_type_name(unsigned int page_type)
>> > diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
>> > index 47bc1bb919cc..241880a46358 100644
>> > --- a/mm/swap.c
>> > +++ b/mm/swap.c
>> > @@ -38,6 +38,10 @@
>> > #include <linux/local_lock.h>
>> > #include <linux/buffer_head.h>
>> >
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM
>> > +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>> > +#endif
>> > +
>> > #include "internal.h"
>> >
>> > #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>> > @@ -101,6 +105,11 @@ static void free_typed_folio(struct folio *folio)
>> > case PGTY_hugetlb:
>> > free_huge_folio(folio);
>> > return;
>> > +#endif
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM
>> > + case PGTY_guestmem:
>> > + kvm_gmem_handle_folio_put(folio);
>> > + return;
>> > #endif
>> > default:
>> > WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
>> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/Kconfig b/virt/kvm/Kconfig
>> > index 54e959e7d68f..37f7734cb10f 100644
>> > --- a/virt/kvm/Kconfig
>> > +++ b/virt/kvm/Kconfig
>> > @@ -124,3 +124,8 @@ config HAVE_KVM_ARCH_GMEM_PREPARE
>> > config HAVE_KVM_ARCH_GMEM_INVALIDATE
>> > bool
>> > depends on KVM_PRIVATE_MEM
>> > +
>> > +config KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM
>> > + select KVM_PRIVATE_MEM
>> > + depends on !KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES
>>
>> Enforcing that KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES is not selected should not
>> be a strict requirement. Fuad explained in an offline chat that this is
>> just temporary.
>>
>> If we have CONFIG_GUESTMEM, then this question is moot, I think
>> CONFIG_GUESTMEM would just be independent of everything else; other
>> configs would depend on CONFIG_GUESTMEM.
>
> There are two things here. First of all, the unfortunate naming
> situation where PRIVATE could mean GUESTMEM, or private could mean not
> shared. I plan to tackle this aspect (i.e., the naming) in a separate
> patch series, since that will surely generate a lot of debate :)
>
Oops. By "depend on CONFIG_GUESTMEM" I meant "depend on the introduction
of the guestmem shim". I think this is a good time to introduce the shim
because the folio_put() callback needs to be in mm and not just in KVM,
which is a loadable module and hence can be removed from memory.
If we do introduce the shim, the config flag CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM
will be replaced by CONFIG_GUESTMEM (or other name), and then the
question on depending on !KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES will be moot
since I think an mm config flag wouldn't place a constraint on a module
config flag?
When I wrote this, I thought that config flags are easily renamed since
they're an interface and are user-facing, but I realized config flag
renaming seems to be easily renamed based on this search [1].
If we're going with renaming in a separate patch series, some mechanism
should be introduced here to handle the case where
1. Kernel (and KVM module) is compiled with KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM set
2. KVM is unloaded
3. folio_put() tries to call kvm_gmem_handle_folio_put()
> The other part is that, with shared memory in-place, the memory
> attributes are an orthogonal matter. The attributes are the userpace's
> view of what it expects the state of the memory to be, and are used to
> multiplex whether the memory being accessed is guest_memfd or the
> regular (i.e., most likely anonymous) memory used normally by KVM.
>
> This behavior however would be architecture, or even vm-type specific.
>
I agree it is orthogonal but I'm calling this out because "depends on
!KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES" means if I set
CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES, I can't use PGTY_guestmem since
CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM would get unset.
I was trying to test this with a KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM, setting up for
using the ioctl to convert memory and hit this issue.
> Cheers,
> /fuad
>
>> > + bool
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=s%3Arename+dfn%3AKconfig+merged
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-10 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-03 17:10 [PATCH v5 0/9] KVM: Mapping guest_memfd backed memory at the host for software protected VMs Fuad Tabba
2025-03-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] mm: Consolidate freeing of typed folios on final folio_put() Fuad Tabba
2025-03-04 8:45 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2025-03-04 9:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] KVM: guest_memfd: Handle final folio_put() of guest_memfd pages Fuad Tabba
2025-03-07 17:04 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-03-10 10:50 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-03-10 14:23 ` Ackerley Tng [this message]
2025-03-10 14:35 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-03-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] KVM: guest_memfd: Allow host to map guest_memfd() pages Fuad Tabba
2025-03-04 8:58 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2025-03-04 9:27 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-03-04 9:45 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2025-03-04 9:52 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-03-06 0:01 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-03-06 8:48 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-03-06 17:05 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-03-06 22:46 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-03-07 8:57 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-03-07 1:53 ` James Houghton
2025-03-07 8:55 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-03-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] KVM: guest_memfd: Handle in-place shared memory as guest_memfd backed memory Fuad Tabba
2025-03-06 16:09 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-03-06 17:02 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-03-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] KVM: x86: Mark KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM as supporting guest_memfd shared memory Fuad Tabba
2025-03-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] KVM: arm64: Refactor user_mem_abort() calculation of force_pte Fuad Tabba
2025-03-06 10:46 ` Quentin Perret
2025-03-06 10:54 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-03-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] KVM: arm64: Handle guest_memfd()-backed guest page faults Fuad Tabba
2025-03-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] KVM: arm64: Enable mapping guest_memfd in arm64 Fuad Tabba
2025-03-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] KVM: guest_memfd: selftests: guest_memfd mmap() test when mapping is allowed Fuad Tabba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=diqz4j01t15e.fsf@ackerleytng-ctop.c.googlers.com \
--to=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amoorthy@google.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=fvdl@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=keirf@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liam.merwick@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=quic_cvanscha@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_eberman@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_mnalajal@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_pderrin@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_pheragu@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_tsoni@quicinc.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roypat@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox