linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liu Song <liusong@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/dmapool.c: avoid duplicate memset within dma_pool_alloc
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 16:37:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dfd23dfd-e0dc-7329-261c-946b179d9bc5@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220817053628.GA28747@lst.de>

A helper function "use_dev_coherent_memory" is introduced here to

>>>> determine whether the memory is allocated by "dma_alloc_from_dev_coherent".
>>>>
>>>> And use "get_dma_ops" to determine whether the memory is allocated by
>>>> "dma_direct_alloc".
> WTF?  get_dma_ops is privat to the DMA API layer, and dmapool has no
> business even using that.  Even independent of this particular case,
> consumers of an API never have any business looking at the implementation
> of the API, that is the whole point of the abstraction.
>
>> It's not even that, the change here is just obviously broken, since it ends
>> up entirely ignoring want_init_on_alloc() for devices using dma-direct.
>> Sure, the memory backing a dma_page is zeroed *once* by its initial
>> dma-coherent allocation, but who says we're not not reallocating pool
>> entries from an existing dma_page?
> And yes, in addition to that it also is completely broken.

After reading everyone's comments, I found that fixing this patch will

make the code look strange, so the benefits of the changes will be

dispensable, so I also agree to discard this patch.

Sorry for this trouble again.


Thanks





      reply	other threads:[~2022-08-18 10:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-18  6:28 Liu Song
     [not found] ` <CGME20220816123958eucas1p1b03a5efa1f5804245a5c1a9b27529015@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2022-08-16 12:39   ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-16 15:00     ` Robin Murphy
2022-08-17  2:03       ` Liu Song
2022-08-17  5:36       ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-18  8:37         ` Liu Song [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dfd23dfd-e0dc-7329-261c-946b179d9bc5@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=liusong@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox