From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-f198.google.com (mail-qk0-f198.google.com [209.85.220.198]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A969C6B0038 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 14:32:51 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qk0-f198.google.com with SMTP id n186so140966746qkb.2 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 11:32:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com. [209.132.183.28]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w37si12590079qtg.323.2017.02.27.11.32.50 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 27 Feb 2017 11:32:50 -0800 (PST) From: Andy Grover Subject: how to unmap pages in an anonymous mmap? References: <1487323472-20481-1-git-send-email-lixiubo@cmss.chinamobile.com> <09891673-0d95-8b66-ddce-0ace7aea43d1@redhat.com> <48b49493-4c82-3ed5-126f-2ea18c701242@cmss.chinamobile.com> <21d93bec-a717-5157-8dcf-cc629611572f@redhat.com> <85a41492-8aba-b752-c180-ec25f43d2a1a@cmss.chinamobile.com> Message-ID: Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 11:32:48 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <85a41492-8aba-b752-c180-ec25f43d2a1a@cmss.chinamobile.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Xiubo Li , nab@linux-iscsi.org, mchristi@redhat.com, shli@kernel.org Cc: hch@lst.de, sheng@yasker.org, namei.unix@gmail.com, bart.vanassche@sandisk.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jianfei Hu , linux-mm@kvack.org On 02/26/2017 09:59 PM, Xiubo Li wrote: >> But, We likely don't want to release memory from the data area anyways >> while active, in any case. How about if we set a timer when active >> commands go to zero, and then reduce data area to some minimum if no new >> cmds come in before timer expires? > > If I understand correctly: for example, we have 1G(as the minimum) > data area and all blocks have been allocated and mapped to runner's > vma, then we extern it to 1G + 256M as needed. When there have no > active cmds and after the timer expires, will it reduce the data area > back to 1G ? And then should it release the reduced 256M data area's > memories ? > > If so, after kfree()ed the blocks' memories, it should also try to remove > all the ptes which are mapping this page(like using the try_to_umap()), > but something like try_to_umap() doesn't export for the modules. > > Without ummaping the kfree()ed pages' ptes mentioned above, then > the reduced 256M vma space couldn't be reused again for the runner > process, because the runner has already do the mapping for the reduced > vma space to some old physical pages(won't trigger new page fault > again). Then there will be a hole, and the hole will be bigger and bigger. > > Without ummaping the kfree()ed pages' ptes mentioned above, the > pages' reference count (page_ref_dec(), which _inc()ed in page fault) > couldn't be reduced back too. Let's ask people who will know... Hi linux-mm, TCM-User (drivers/target/target_core_user.c) currently uses vmalloc()ed memory to back a ring buffer that is mmaped by userspace. We want to move to dynamically mapping pages into this region, and also we'd like to unmap/free pages when idle. What's the right way to unmap? I see unmap_mapping_range() but that mentions an underlying file, which TCMU doesn't have. Or maybe zap_page_range()? But it's not exported. Any advice? Thanks in advance -- Regards -- Andy -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org