Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mm/huge_memory: replace can_split_folio() with direct refcount calculation

["David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@kernel.org>]

On 11/22/25 03:55, Zi Yan wrote:
> can_split_folio() is just a refcount comparison, making sure only the
> split caller holds an extra pin. Open code it with
> folio_expected_ref_count() != folio_ref_count() - 1. For the extra_pins
> used by folio_ref_freeze(), add folio_cache_references() to calculate it.
> 
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> ---
>   include/linux/huge_mm.h |  1 -
>   mm/huge_memory.c        | 43 ++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>   mm/vmscan.c             |  3 ++-
>   3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> index 97686fb46e30..1ecaeccf39c9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> @@ -369,7 +369,6 @@ enum split_type {
>   	SPLIT_TYPE_NON_UNIFORM,
>   };
>   
> -bool can_split_folio(struct folio *folio, int caller_pins, int *pextra_pins);
>   int __split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
>   		unsigned int new_order);
>   int folio_split_unmapped(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order);
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index c1f1055165dd..6c821c1c0ac3 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -3455,23 +3455,6 @@ static void lru_add_split_folio(struct folio *folio, struct folio *new_folio,
>   	}
>   }
>   
> -/* Racy check whether the huge page can be split */
> -bool can_split_folio(struct folio *folio, int caller_pins, int *pextra_pins)
> -{
> -	int extra_pins;
> -
> -	/* Additional pins from page cache */
> -	if (folio_test_anon(folio))
> -		extra_pins = folio_test_swapcache(folio) ?
> -				folio_nr_pages(folio) : 0;
> -	else
> -		extra_pins = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> -	if (pextra_pins)
> -		*pextra_pins = extra_pins;
> -	return folio_mapcount(folio) == folio_ref_count(folio) - extra_pins -
> -					caller_pins;
> -}
> -
>   static bool page_range_has_hwpoisoned(struct page *page, long nr_pages)
>   {
>   	for (; nr_pages; page++, nr_pages--)
> @@ -3776,17 +3759,26 @@ int folio_check_splittable(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +/* Number of folio references from the pagecache or the swapcache. */
> +static unsigned int folio_cache_references(const struct folio *folio)
> +{
> +	if (folio_test_anon(folio) && !folio_test_swapcache(folio))
> +		return 0;
> +	return folio_nr_pages(folio);
> +}
> +
>   static int __folio_freeze_and_split_unmapped(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
>   					     struct page *split_at, struct xa_state *xas,
>   					     struct address_space *mapping, bool do_lru,
>   					     struct list_head *list, enum split_type split_type,
> -					     pgoff_t end, int *nr_shmem_dropped, int extra_pins)
> +					     pgoff_t end, int *nr_shmem_dropped)
>   {
>   	struct folio *end_folio = folio_next(folio);
>   	struct folio *new_folio, *next;
>   	int old_order = folio_order(folio);
>   	int ret = 0;
>   	struct deferred_split *ds_queue;
> +	int extra_pins = folio_cache_references(folio);

Can we just inline the call do folio_cache_references() and get rid of extra_pins.
(which is a bad name either way)


if (folio_ref_freeze(folio, folio_cache_references(folio) + 1) {


BTW, now that we have this helper, I wonder if we should then also do for
clarification on the unfreeze path:

diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 0acdc2f26ee0c..7cbcf61b7971d 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -3824,8 +3824,7 @@ static int __folio_freeze_and_split_unmapped(struct folio *folio, unsigned int n
  
                         zone_device_private_split_cb(folio, new_folio);
  
-                       expected_refs = folio_expected_ref_count(new_folio) + 1;
-                       folio_ref_unfreeze(new_folio, expected_refs);
+                       folio_ref_unfreeze(new_folio, folio_cache_references(new_folio) + 1);
  
                         if (do_lru)
                                 lru_add_split_folio(folio, new_folio, lruvec, list);
@@ -3868,8 +3867,7 @@ static int __folio_freeze_and_split_unmapped(struct folio *folio, unsigned int n
                  * Otherwise, a parallel folio_try_get() can grab @folio
                  * and its caller can see stale page cache entries.
                  */
-               expected_refs = folio_expected_ref_count(folio) + 1;
-               folio_ref_unfreeze(folio, expected_refs);
+               folio_ref_unfreeze(folio, folio_cache_references(folio) + 1);
  
                 if (do_lru)
                         unlock_page_lruvec(lruvec);


-- 
Cheers

David