linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lu, Aaron" <aaron.lu@intel.com>
To: "42.hyeyoo@gmail.com" <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	"song@kernel.org" <song@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] x86/mm/cpa: restore global bit when page is present
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 08:16:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <df4f40ff3e4c408931ed21ab4e8968bdb1871f79.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YvSRyjDsrbB7v2JT@ip-172-31-24-42.ap-northeast-1.compute.internal>

On Thu, 2022-08-11 at 05:21 +0000, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 10:56:46PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > For configs that don't have PTI enabled or cpus that don't need
> > meltdown mitigation, current kernel can lose GLOBAL bit after a page
> > goes through a cycle of present -> not present -> present.
> > 
> > It happened like this(__vunmap() does this in vm_remove_mappings()):
> > original page protection: 0x8000000000000163 (NX/G/D/A/RW/P)
> > set_memory_np(page, 1):   0x8000000000000062 (NX/D/A/RW) lose G and P
> > set_memory_p(pagem 1):    0x8000000000000063 (NX/D/A/RW/P) restored P
> > 
> > In the end, this page's protection no longer has Global bit set and this
> > would create problem for this merge small mapping feature.
> > 
> > For this reason, restore Global bit for systems that do not have PTI
> > enabled if page is present.
> > 
> > (pgprot_clear_protnone_bits() deserves a better name if this patch is
> > acceptible but first, I would like to get some feedback if this is the
> > right way to solve this so I didn't bother with the name yet)
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> > index 1abd5438f126..33657a54670a 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> > @@ -758,6 +758,8 @@ static pgprot_t pgprot_clear_protnone_bits(pgprot_t prot)
> >  	 */
> >  	if (!(pgprot_val(prot) & _PAGE_PRESENT))
> >  		pgprot_val(prot) &= ~_PAGE_GLOBAL;
> > +	else
> > +		pgprot_val(prot) |= _PAGE_GLOBAL & __default_kernel_pte_mask;
> >  
> >  	return prot;
> >  }
> 
> IIUC It makes it unable to set _PAGE_GLOBL when PTI is on.
> 

Yes. Is this a problem?
I think that is the intended behaviour when PTI is on: not to enable
Gloabl bit on kernel mappings.

> Maybe it would be less intrusive to make
> set_direct_map_default_noflush() replace protection bits
> with PAGE_KENREL as it's only called for direct map, and the function
> is to reset permission to default:
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> index 1abd5438f126..0dd4433c1382 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
> @@ -2250,7 +2250,16 @@ int set_direct_map_invalid_noflush(struct page *page)
> 
>  int set_direct_map_default_noflush(struct page *page)
>  {
> -       return __set_pages_p(page, 1);
> +       unsigned long tempaddr = (unsigned long) page_address(page);
> +       struct cpa_data cpa = {
> +                       .vaddr = &tempaddr,
> +                       .pgd = NULL,
> +                       .numpages = 1,
> +                       .mask_set = PAGE_KERNEL,
> +                       .mask_clr = __pgprot(~0),
> +                       .flags = 0};
> +
> +       return __change_page_attr_set_clr(&cpa, 0);
>  }

Looks reasonable to me and it is indeed less intrusive. I'm only
concerned there might be other paths that also go through present ->
not present -> present and this change can not cover them.

> 
> set_direct_map_{invalid,default}_noflush() is the exact reason
> why direct map become split after vmalloc/vfree with special
> permissions.

Yes I agree, because it can lose G bit after the whole cycle when PTI
is not on. When PTI is on, there is no such problem because G bit is
not there initially.

Thanks,
Aaron

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-11  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-08 14:56 [RFC PATCH 0/4] x86/mm/cpa: merge small mappings whenever possible Aaron Lu
2022-08-08 14:56 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] x86/mm/cpa: restore global bit when page is present Aaron Lu
2022-08-11  5:21   ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-08-11  8:16     ` Lu, Aaron [this message]
2022-08-11 11:30       ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-08-11 12:28         ` Aaron Lu
2022-08-08 14:56 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] x86/mm/cpa: merge splitted direct mapping when possible Aaron Lu
2022-08-08 14:56 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] x86/mm/cpa: add merge event counter Aaron Lu
2022-08-08 14:56 ` [TEST NOT_FOR_MERGE 4/4] x86/mm/cpa: add a test interface to split direct map Aaron Lu
2022-08-09 10:04 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] x86/mm/cpa: merge small mappings whenever possible Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-08-09 14:58   ` Aaron Lu
2022-08-09 17:56     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-08-11  4:50 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-08-11  7:50   ` Lu, Aaron
2022-08-13 16:05   ` Mike Rapoport
2022-08-16  6:33     ` Aaron Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=df4f40ff3e4c408931ed21ab4e8968bdb1871f79.camel@intel.com \
    --to=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox