From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl1-f197.google.com (mail-pl1-f197.google.com [209.85.214.197]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293DE6B070E for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 12:20:52 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pl1-f197.google.com with SMTP id b39-v6so1793110plb.3 for ; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 09:20:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com. [192.55.52.115]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u131-v6si7786730pgc.465.2018.11.09.09.20.51 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Nov 2018 09:20:51 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/27] x86/fpu/xstate: Add XSAVES system states for shadow stack References: <20181011151523.27101-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20181011151523.27101-5-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <4295b8f786c10c469870a6d9725749ce75dcdaa2.camel@intel.com> <043a17ef-dc9f-56d2-5fba-1a58b7b0fd4d@intel.com> <20181108220054.GP3074@bombadil.infradead.org> <20181109003225.GQ3074@bombadil.infradead.org> <6cd2ae51-2d2a-9c68-df7c-45b49e0a813f@intel.com> <20181109171740.GT3074@bombadil.infradead.org> From: Dave Hansen Message-ID: Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 09:20:50 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181109171740.GT3074@bombadil.infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Yu-cheng Yu , X86 ML , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , LKML , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , Linux-MM , linux-arch , Linux API , Arnd Bergmann , Balbir Singh , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Florian Weimer , "H. J. Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Machek , Peter Zijlstra , Randy Dunlap , "Ravi V. Shankar" , "Shanbhogue, Vedvyas" On 11/9/18 9:17 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >> But, later versions of the hardware have instructions that don't have >> static offsets for the state components (when the XSAVES/XSAVEC >> instructions are used). So, for those, the structure embedding isn't >> used at *all* since some state might not be present. > But *when present*, this structure is always aligned on an 8-byte > boundary, right? There's no guarantee of that. There is an "aligned" attribute for each XSAVE state component, but I do not believe it is set for anything yet.