linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jane.chu@oracle.com
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org,
	muchun.song@linux.dev, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
	Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, vbabka@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org,
	surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, corbet@lwn.net,
	skhan@linuxfoundation.org, hughd@google.com,
	baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, peterx@redhat.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] hugetlb: make hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash() take PAGE_SIZE index
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 14:32:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dde32efa-e02e-4e44-a705-f558e0caa869@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad0rUB4FuNUOJ1pN@localhost.localdomain>



On 4/13/2026 10:43 AM, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2026 at 05:41:54PM -0600, Jane Chu wrote:
>> hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash() is used to serialize faults and page cache
>> operations on the same hugetlb file offset. The helper currently expects
>> its index argument in hugetlb page granularity, so callers have to
>> open-code conversions from the PAGE_SIZE-based indices commonly used
>> in the rest of MM helpers.
>>
>> Change hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash() to take a PAGE_SIZE-based index
>> instead, and perform the hugetlb-granularity conversion inside the helper.
>> Update all callers accordingly.
>>
>> This makes the helper interface consistent with filemap_get_folio(),
>> and linear_page_index(), while preserving the same lock selection for
>> a given hugetlb file offset.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>   fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
>>   mm/hugetlb.c         | 28 +++++++++++++++++++---------
>>   mm/memfd.c           | 11 ++++++-----
>>   mm/userfaultfd.c     |  7 +++----
>>   4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
>> index cf79fb830377..e24e9bf54e14 100644
>> --- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
>> @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static void remove_inode_hugepages(struct inode *inode, loff_t lstart,
>>   	struct address_space *mapping = &inode->i_data;
>>   	const pgoff_t end = lend >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>>   	struct folio_batch fbatch;
>> -	pgoff_t next, index;
>> +	pgoff_t next, idx;
>>   	int i, freed = 0;
>>   	bool truncate_op = (lend == LLONG_MAX);
>>   
>> @@ -586,15 +586,15 @@ static void remove_inode_hugepages(struct inode *inode, loff_t lstart,
>>   			struct folio *folio = fbatch.folios[i];
>>   			u32 hash = 0;
>>   
>> -			index = folio->index >> huge_page_order(h);
>> -			hash = hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(mapping, index);
>> +			hash = hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(mapping, folio->index);
>>   			mutex_lock(&hugetlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]);
>>   
>>   			/*
>>   			 * Remove folio that was part of folio_batch.
>>   			 */
>> +			idx = folio->index >> huge_page_order(h);
>>   			remove_inode_single_folio(h, inode, mapping, folio,
>> -						  index, truncate_op);
>> +						  idx, truncate_op);
> 
> Since this is the only place we call remove_inode_single_folio(), and that we do not
> the index (at least index >> huge_page_order()) directly in this function, would it not be
> better to make remove_inode_single_folio do the conversion itself?

In PATCH 6/6, remove_inode_hugepages() is changed to call 
remove_inode_single_folio() passing "folio->index" directly,
thus eliminating the above conversion altogether.
I apologize for dividing up the patches this way, function by function,
for my convenience, introduced some temporary changes.  The overall 
resulted code hopefully is clearer.

> 
> Also, I am thinking out loud here but we do have a few places where we
> go: idx = index >> huge_page_order() to convert it into hugepage units, but the casual
> reader might be a bit puzzled about that.
> So, would it be worth to have implement an inline helper with an accurate name
> to do that? It might help whoever reads that?
> 

Indeed, will add below inline helpers -
   pgoff_t  huge_to_base(pgoff_t idx);
   pgoff_t  base_to_huge(pgoff_t index);

thanks!
-jane




  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-13 21:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-09 23:41 [PATCH 0/6] hugetlb: normalize exported interfaces to use base-page indices Jane Chu
2026-04-09 23:41 ` [PATCH 1/6] hugetlb: open-code hugetlb folio lookup index conversion Jane Chu
2026-04-11 14:14   ` Mike Rapoport
2026-04-13 16:39     ` jane.chu
2026-04-13 16:22   ` Oscar Salvador
2026-04-13 16:30     ` jane.chu
2026-04-09 23:41 ` [PATCH 2/6] hugetlb: remove the hugetlb_linear_page_index() helper Jane Chu
2026-04-13 16:48   ` Oscar Salvador
2026-04-09 23:41 ` [PATCH 3/6] hugetlb: make hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash() take PAGE_SIZE index Jane Chu
2026-04-10 11:24   ` Usama Arif
2026-04-10 17:51     ` jane.chu
2026-04-13 17:43   ` Oscar Salvador
2026-04-13 21:32     ` jane.chu [this message]
2026-04-09 23:41 ` [PATCH 4/6] hugetlb: drop vma_hugecache_offset() in favor of linear_page_index() Jane Chu
2026-04-09 23:41 ` [PATCH 5/6] hugetlb: make hugetlb_add_to_page_cache() use PAGE_SIZE-based index Jane Chu
2026-04-09 23:41 ` [PATCH 6/6] hugetlb: pass hugetlb reservation ranges in base-page indices Jane Chu
2026-04-10  6:45 ` [syzbot ci] Re: hugetlb: normalize exported interfaces to use " syzbot ci
2026-04-10 21:54   ` jane.chu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dde32efa-e02e-4e44-a705-f558e0caa869@oracle.com \
    --to=jane.chu@oracle.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox