From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Cc: ryan.roberts@arm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, cl@gentwo.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
mhocko@suse.com, apopple@nvidia.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
will@kernel.org, baohua@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz,
mark.rutland@arm.com, hughd@google.com, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org,
yang@os.amperecomputing.com, peterx@redhat.com,
ioworker0@gmail.com, jglisse@google.com,
wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mm: Abstract THP allocation
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 15:00:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ddd3fcd2-48b3-4170-bcaa-2fe66e093f43@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8bc0e51b-0e9b-4eeb-997f-e2a0b1a0c0f8@arm.com>
On 11.09.24 14:53, Dev Jain wrote:
>
> On 9/11/24 14:57, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 11.09.24 08:55, Dev Jain wrote:
>>> In preparation for the second patch, abstract away the THP allocation
>>> logic present in the create_huge_pmd() path, which corresponds to the
>>> faulting case when no page is present.
>>>
>>> There should be no functional change as a result of applying
>>> this patch.
>>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> +
>>> +static void map_pmd_thp(struct folio *folio, struct vm_fault *vmf,
>>> + struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long haddr)
>>> +{
>>> + pmd_t entry;
>>> +
>>> + entry = mk_huge_pmd(&folio->page, vma->vm_page_prot);
>>> + entry = maybe_pmd_mkwrite(pmd_mkdirty(entry), vma);
>>> + folio_add_new_anon_rmap(folio, vma, haddr, RMAP_EXCLUSIVE);
>>> + folio_add_lru_vma(folio, vma);
>>> + set_pmd_at(vma->vm_mm, haddr, vmf->pmd, entry);
>>> + update_mmu_cache_pmd(vma, vmf->address, vmf->pmd);
>>
>> It's quite weird to see a mixture of haddr and vmf->address, and
>> likely this mixture is wrong or not not required.
>>
>> Looking at arc's update_mmu_cache_pmd() implementation, I cannot see
>> how passing in the unaligned address would do the right thing. But
>> maybe arc also doesn't trigger that code path ... who knows :)
>
> If I am reading correctly, arch/arc/mm/tlb.c: update_mmu_cache_pmd()
> calls update_mmu_cache_range() which is already expecting an unaligned
> address? But...
So update_mmu_cache_pmd() calls
update_mmu_cache_range(NULL, vma, addr, &pte, HPAGE_PMD_NR);
But update_mmu_cache_range() only aligns it *to page boundary*:
unsigned long vaddr = vaddr_unaligned & PAGE_MASK;
We obtain the correct hugepage-aligned physical address from the PTE
phys_addr_t paddr = pte_val(*ptep) & PAGE_MASK_PHYS;
Then, we look at the offset in our folio
unsigned long offset = offset_in_folio(folio, paddr);
And adjust both vaddr and paddr
paddr -= offset;
vaddr -= offset;
To then use that combination with
__inv_icache_pages(paddr, vaddr, nr);
If I am not wrong, getting a non-hugepage aligned vaddr messes up things
here. But only regarding the icache I think.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-11 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-11 6:55 [PATCH v3 0/2] Do not shatter hugezeropage on wp-fault Dev Jain
2024-09-11 6:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mm: Abstract THP allocation Dev Jain
2024-09-11 9:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-11 9:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-11 12:02 ` Dev Jain
2024-09-11 12:00 ` Dev Jain
2024-09-11 12:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-11 12:55 ` Dev Jain
2024-09-11 12:53 ` Dev Jain
2024-09-11 13:00 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2024-09-11 13:05 ` Dev Jain
2024-09-11 13:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-11 13:16 ` Dev Jain
2024-09-11 10:52 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-09-11 12:22 ` Dev Jain
2024-09-12 13:26 ` kernel test robot
2024-09-11 6:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: Allocate THP on hugezeropage wp-fault Dev Jain
2024-09-11 9:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-11 12:10 ` Dev Jain
2024-09-11 12:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-12 15:44 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ddd3fcd2-48b3-4170-bcaa-2fe66e093f43@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jglisse@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox