From: Bixuan Cui <cuibixuan@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Lv Ying <lvying6@huawei.com>,
rafael@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com,
tony.luck@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, naoya.horiguchi@nec.com,
linmiaohe@huawei.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com, ashish.kalra@amd.com
Cc: xiezhipeng1@huawei.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
xiexiuqi@huawei.com, tanxiaofei@huawei.com,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] ACPI: APEI: fix reboot caused by synchronous error loop because of memory_failure() failed
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 20:29:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ddc81946-8b76-ea49-ebf5-f2de2e30540d@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221205115111.131568-3-lvying6@huawei.com>
在 2022/12/5 19:51, Lv Ying 写道:
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index 3b6ac3694b8d..4c1c558f7161 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -2266,7 +2266,11 @@ static void __memory_failure_work_func(struct work_struct *work, bool sync)
> break;
> if (entry.flags & MF_SOFT_OFFLINE)
> soft_offline_page(entry.pfn, entry.flags);
> - else if (!sync || (entry.flags & MF_ACTION_REQUIRED))
> + else if (sync) {
> + if ((entry.flags & MF_ACTION_REQUIRED) &&
> + memory_failure(entry.pfn, entry.flags))
> + force_sig_mceerr(BUS_MCEERR_AR, 0, 0);
> + } else
> memory_failure(entry.pfn, entry.flags);
Hi,
Some of the ideas in this patch are wrong :-(
1. As Shuai Xue said, it is wrong to judge synchronization error and
asynchronization error through functions such as
memory_failure_queue_kick()/ghes_proc()/ghes_proc_in_irq(), because both
synchronization error and asynchronization error may go to the same
notification.
2. There is no need to pass 'sync' to __memory_failure_work_func(),
because memory_failure() can directly handle synchronous and
asynchronous errors according to entry.flags & MF_ACTION_REQUIRED:
entry.flags & MF_ACTION_REQUIRED == 1: Action: poison page and kill task
for synchronous error
entry.flags & MF_ACTION_REQUIRED == 0: Action: poison page for
asynchronous error
Reference x86:
do_machine_check # MCE, synchronous
->kill_me_maybe
->memory_failure(p->mce_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT, MF_ACTION_REQUIRED);
uc_decode_notifier # CMCI, asynchronous
->memory_failure(pfn, 0)
At the same time, the modification here is repeated with your patch 01
if (sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE && sec_sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE)
- flags = 0;
+ flags = sync ? MF_ACTION_REQUIRED : 0;
3. Why add 'force_sig_mceerr(BUS_MCEERR_AR, 0, 0)' after
memory_failure(pfn, MF_ACTION_REQUIRED)?
The task will be killed in memory_failure():
if poisoned, kill_accessing_process()->kill_proc()
if not poisoned, hwpoison_user_mappings()->collect_procs()->kill_procs()
Reference x86 to handle synchronous error:
kill_me_maybe()
{
int flags = MF_ACTION_REQUIRED;
ret = memory_failure(p->mce_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT, flags);
if (!ret) {
...
return;
}
if (ret == -EHWPOISON || ret == -EOPNOTSUPP)
return;
pr_err("Memory error not recovered");
kill_me_now(cb);
}
Thanks,
Bixuan Cui
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-07 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-05 11:51 [RFC 0/2] ACPI: APEI: Make synchronization errors call and Lv Ying
2022-12-05 11:51 ` [RFC 1/2] ACPI: APEI: Make memory_failure() triggered by synchronization errors execute in the current context Lv Ying
2022-12-07 10:57 ` Shuai Xue
2022-12-08 2:20 ` Lv Ying
2022-12-08 3:25 ` Shuai Xue
2022-12-08 7:16 ` Lv Ying
2022-12-08 2:37 ` Xie XiuQi
2022-12-08 3:41 ` Shuai Xue
2022-12-05 11:51 ` [RFC 2/2] ACPI: APEI: fix reboot caused by synchronous error loop because of memory_failure() failed Lv Ying
2022-12-07 12:29 ` Bixuan Cui [this message]
2022-12-08 2:44 ` Lv Ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ddc81946-8b76-ea49-ebf5-f2de2e30540d@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=cuibixuan@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lvying6@huawei.com \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=tanxiaofei@huawei.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
--cc=xiezhipeng1@huawei.com \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox