Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add mm-related procfs files to MM sections

["Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>]

On 3/6/26 02:34, SeongJae Park wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Mar 2026 09:26:29 +0100 "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
>> Some procfs files are very much related to memory management so let's
>> have MAINTAINERS reflect that.
>> 
>> Add fs/proc/meminfo.c to MEMORY MANAGEMENT - CORE.
>> 
>> Add fs/proc/task_[no]mmu.c to MEMORY MAPPING.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
> 
> I have a few trivial comments below.  Regardless of those,
> 
> Acked-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>

Thanks!

>> ---
>>  MAINTAINERS | 3 +++
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index 3553554019e8..39987895bcfc 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -16683,6 +16683,7 @@ F:	include/linux/ptdump.h
>>  F:	include/linux/vmpressure.h
>>  F:	include/linux/vmstat.h
>>  F:	include/trace/events/zone_lock.h
>> +F:	fs/proc/meminfo.c
> 
> Should we sort files alphabetically, and hence put this before 'include/...' ?

Hm I mentally sorted include/headers above all .c files :)

> I see a few other MAINTAINERS sections including 'MEMORY MANGEMENT -
> USERFAULTFD' are doing so.  I have no strong opinion, though.

The get_maintainers.pl script doesn't care about that so I don't care much
either. Unless someone does.

>>  F:	kernel/fork.c
>>  F:	mm/Kconfig
>>  F:	mm/debug.c
>> @@ -16998,6 +16999,8 @@ S:	Maintained
>>  W:	http://www.linux-mm.org
>>  T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
>>  F:	include/trace/events/mmap.h
>> +F:	fs/proc/task_mmu.c
>> +F:	fs/proc/task_nommu.c
> 
> Ditto.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> SJ
> 
> [...]