linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] selftests/mm: static process_madvise() wrapper for guard-pages
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 14:51:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd630868-0d51-41a2-8c19-e93657dcb4ed@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fcb6cf10-7789-4eee-bba1-55a2c131d935@lucifer.local>

On 07/01/2025 14:48, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 02:29:35PM +0000, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> The recently introduced guard-pages mm selftest uses the
>> process_madvise() syscall, a wrapper for which was added to glibc v2.36.
>> For those of us stuck with older distributions this causes a compile
>> error when compiling the mm selftests. For example Ubuntu 22.04 uses
>> glibc 2.35, which does not have the wrapper.
> 
> Ah oops! I didn't check glibc and had erroneously assumed this would be
> trivially available, but perhaps using a rolling release distro has warped
> my perceptions on this rather...
> 
> At any rate you're entire correct, this is very much needed, cheers!
> 
>>
>> To workaround the issue, let's introduce our own static
>> process_madvise() wrapper that uses glibc's syscall() helper.
>>
>> While we are at it, add the guard-page test suite to run_vmtests.sh so
>> that it can be automatically run by CI systems.
> 
> Oops part 2... I was sure I had added it there... thanks!
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>

No worries, thanks for the quick review!

> 
>> ---
>>
>> Applies on top of mm-unstable (f349e79bfbf3)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ryan
>>
>>  tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-pages.c  | 10 ++++++++--
>>  tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh |  5 +++++
>>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-pages.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-pages.c
>> index d8f8dee9ebbd..ece37212a8a2 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-pages.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-pages.c
>> @@ -55,6 +55,12 @@ static int pidfd_open(pid_t pid, unsigned int flags)
>>  	return syscall(SYS_pidfd_open, pid, flags);
>>  }
>>
>> +static ssize_t sys_process_madvise(int pidfd, const struct iovec *iovec,
>> +				   size_t n, int advice, unsigned int flags)
>> +{
>> +	return syscall(__NR_process_madvise, pidfd, iovec, n, advice, flags);
>> +}
>> +
>>  /*
>>   * Enable our signal catcher and try to read/write the specified buffer. The
>>   * return value indicates whether the read/write succeeds without a fatal
>> @@ -419,7 +425,7 @@ TEST_F(guard_pages, process_madvise)
>>  	ASSERT_EQ(munmap(&ptr_region[99 * page_size], page_size), 0);
>>
>>  	/* Now guard in one step. */
>> -	count = process_madvise(pidfd, vec, 6, MADV_GUARD_INSTALL, 0);
>> +	count = sys_process_madvise(pidfd, vec, 6, MADV_GUARD_INSTALL, 0);
>>
>>  	/* OK we don't have permission to do this, skip. */
>>  	if (count == -1 && errno == EPERM)
>> @@ -440,7 +446,7 @@ TEST_F(guard_pages, process_madvise)
>>  	ASSERT_FALSE(try_read_write_buf(&ptr3[19 * page_size]));
>>
>>  	/* Now do the same with unguard... */
>> -	count = process_madvise(pidfd, vec, 6, MADV_GUARD_REMOVE, 0);
>> +	count = sys_process_madvise(pidfd, vec, 6, MADV_GUARD_REMOVE, 0);
>>
>>  	/* ...and everything should now succeed. */
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh
>> index 2fc290d9430c..00c3f07ea100 100755
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh
>> @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ separated by spaces:
>>  	vmalloc smoke tests
>>  - hmm
>>  	hmm smoke tests
>> +- madv_guard
>> +	test madvise(2) MADV_GUARD_INSTALL and MADV_GUARD_REMOVE options
>>  - madv_populate
>>  	test memadvise(2) MADV_POPULATE_{READ,WRITE} options
>>  - memfd_secret
>> @@ -375,6 +377,9 @@ CATEGORY="mremap" run_test ./mremap_dontunmap
>>
>>  CATEGORY="hmm" run_test bash ./test_hmm.sh smoke
>>
>> +# MADV_GUARD_INSTALL and MADV_GUARD_REMOVE tests
>> +CATEGORY="madv_guard" run_test ./guard-pages
>> +
>>  # MADV_POPULATE_READ and MADV_POPULATE_WRITE tests
>>  CATEGORY="madv_populate" run_test ./madv_populate
>>
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>



      reply	other threads:[~2025-01-07 14:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-07 14:29 Ryan Roberts
2025-01-07 14:48 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-01-07 14:51   ` Ryan Roberts [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dd630868-0d51-41a2-8c19-e93657dcb4ed@arm.com \
    --to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox