From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] selftests/mm: static process_madvise() wrapper for guard-pages
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 14:51:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd630868-0d51-41a2-8c19-e93657dcb4ed@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fcb6cf10-7789-4eee-bba1-55a2c131d935@lucifer.local>
On 07/01/2025 14:48, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 02:29:35PM +0000, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> The recently introduced guard-pages mm selftest uses the
>> process_madvise() syscall, a wrapper for which was added to glibc v2.36.
>> For those of us stuck with older distributions this causes a compile
>> error when compiling the mm selftests. For example Ubuntu 22.04 uses
>> glibc 2.35, which does not have the wrapper.
>
> Ah oops! I didn't check glibc and had erroneously assumed this would be
> trivially available, but perhaps using a rolling release distro has warped
> my perceptions on this rather...
>
> At any rate you're entire correct, this is very much needed, cheers!
>
>>
>> To workaround the issue, let's introduce our own static
>> process_madvise() wrapper that uses glibc's syscall() helper.
>>
>> While we are at it, add the guard-page test suite to run_vmtests.sh so
>> that it can be automatically run by CI systems.
>
> Oops part 2... I was sure I had added it there... thanks!
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
No worries, thanks for the quick review!
>
>> ---
>>
>> Applies on top of mm-unstable (f349e79bfbf3)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ryan
>>
>> tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-pages.c | 10 ++++++++--
>> tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh | 5 +++++
>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-pages.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-pages.c
>> index d8f8dee9ebbd..ece37212a8a2 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-pages.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-pages.c
>> @@ -55,6 +55,12 @@ static int pidfd_open(pid_t pid, unsigned int flags)
>> return syscall(SYS_pidfd_open, pid, flags);
>> }
>>
>> +static ssize_t sys_process_madvise(int pidfd, const struct iovec *iovec,
>> + size_t n, int advice, unsigned int flags)
>> +{
>> + return syscall(__NR_process_madvise, pidfd, iovec, n, advice, flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * Enable our signal catcher and try to read/write the specified buffer. The
>> * return value indicates whether the read/write succeeds without a fatal
>> @@ -419,7 +425,7 @@ TEST_F(guard_pages, process_madvise)
>> ASSERT_EQ(munmap(&ptr_region[99 * page_size], page_size), 0);
>>
>> /* Now guard in one step. */
>> - count = process_madvise(pidfd, vec, 6, MADV_GUARD_INSTALL, 0);
>> + count = sys_process_madvise(pidfd, vec, 6, MADV_GUARD_INSTALL, 0);
>>
>> /* OK we don't have permission to do this, skip. */
>> if (count == -1 && errno == EPERM)
>> @@ -440,7 +446,7 @@ TEST_F(guard_pages, process_madvise)
>> ASSERT_FALSE(try_read_write_buf(&ptr3[19 * page_size]));
>>
>> /* Now do the same with unguard... */
>> - count = process_madvise(pidfd, vec, 6, MADV_GUARD_REMOVE, 0);
>> + count = sys_process_madvise(pidfd, vec, 6, MADV_GUARD_REMOVE, 0);
>>
>> /* ...and everything should now succeed. */
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh
>> index 2fc290d9430c..00c3f07ea100 100755
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh
>> @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ separated by spaces:
>> vmalloc smoke tests
>> - hmm
>> hmm smoke tests
>> +- madv_guard
>> + test madvise(2) MADV_GUARD_INSTALL and MADV_GUARD_REMOVE options
>> - madv_populate
>> test memadvise(2) MADV_POPULATE_{READ,WRITE} options
>> - memfd_secret
>> @@ -375,6 +377,9 @@ CATEGORY="mremap" run_test ./mremap_dontunmap
>>
>> CATEGORY="hmm" run_test bash ./test_hmm.sh smoke
>>
>> +# MADV_GUARD_INSTALL and MADV_GUARD_REMOVE tests
>> +CATEGORY="madv_guard" run_test ./guard-pages
>> +
>> # MADV_POPULATE_READ and MADV_POPULATE_WRITE tests
>> CATEGORY="madv_populate" run_test ./madv_populate
>>
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-07 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-07 14:29 Ryan Roberts
2025-01-07 14:48 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-01-07 14:51 ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dd630868-0d51-41a2-8c19-e93657dcb4ed@arm.com \
--to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox