From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E82DE65D14 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 02:11:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 11F128D0008; Thu, 21 Nov 2024 21:11:54 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 0CFBD8D0007; Thu, 21 Nov 2024 21:11:54 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id EB1A88D0008; Thu, 21 Nov 2024 21:11:53 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0015.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.15]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1348D0007 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2024 21:11:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin04.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78EDEAEADB for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 02:11:53 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 82812104256.04.1C51E0E Received: from flow-b6-smtp.messagingengine.com (flow-b6-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.141]) by imf03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E623420015 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 02:11:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf03.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=b3Irpy9C; dmarc=none; spf=none (imf03.hostedemail.com: domain of fthain@linux-m68k.org has no SPF policy when checking 202.12.124.141) smtp.mailfrom=fthain@linux-m68k.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1732241324; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=M0n/zRiaIb7fFAFVL3DbgKe6/xd/zmRAUlKusYHD8XJNtYGOykON+zOvQhgaP892DVsN0c VkljKezfI2gsIJZJaV4KO6jgRKfUwTixCbl5wJGB2X1fq+YLAeB7yH3cM1hEYqiDvfZweW S8mO11hddYrlLjfyOCAzctIrzgVF8u8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf03.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=b3Irpy9C; dmarc=none; spf=none (imf03.hostedemail.com: domain of fthain@linux-m68k.org has no SPF policy when checking 202.12.124.141) smtp.mailfrom=fthain@linux-m68k.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1732241324; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=HylobLOw4ozA3ZsgMN3A1CJKTLhCugUmrHOt6P6eI6M=; b=nfx9oZorkirERXvJTJHgwWr0RcOuo+Rp21NaLjuFXxK/jvKlgQWcKje0u63nX0f9IXhXnr MS/uLAl6x9qLzJhXMIgQiBlHRsx+r0QIu5Of7KlUAjJdVh6RFeYmITjABxN9vfvfotQ8dk oExF9PVR6zU6WgSZ88gCAlDw4/Q9etE= Received: from phl-compute-07.internal (phl-compute-07.phl.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailflow.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA08D1D4055F; Thu, 21 Nov 2024 21:11:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-07.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 21 Nov 2024 21:11:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1732241509; x=1732248709; bh=HylobLOw4ozA3ZsgMN3A1CJKTLhCugUmrHO t6P6eI6M=; b=b3Irpy9CN1X7xtDjGC5aWAUtKCfwXUFdgndUfSfSaowMMhKH5HT q4Xga4uB+cvQU+bZM5/HwJ4ytBCklJRgQVwU6mGeVWhVL7ea6JVdZ7uiwNPUaH3S wi0Do0tWSJAYrSNcvdlFLYWfuOHSWwW3qdBPGLeiUePeYsWfgEkWwBX+pfSBwe+5 agGbCGwWa4uN+vw7Ln9OQsgcCeJEPI4EQqYqJbGuvmm/XzN4qyPRTG7OpgbJdtkQ Px/y3VVjUEXHRTUH7yZUxEgBWGE/0YkKKWP0KOgWtc0yudPXRRyfvoy7YcvChGOV UHrrSZOOQutg8v0Pluj9+CHyE3BiJAfFTYA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefuddrfeejgdegvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpuffr tefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnth hsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvvefujgfkfhggtgesthdtredttddtvdenucfh rhhomhephfhinhhnucfvhhgrihhnuceofhhthhgrihhnsehlihhnuhigqdhmieekkhdroh hrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepleeuheelheekgfeuvedtveetjeekhfffkeefffff tdfgjeevkeegfedvueehueelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpe hmrghilhhfrhhomhepfhhthhgrihhnsehlihhnuhigqdhmieekkhdrohhrghdpnhgspghr tghpthhtohepvddvpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehglhgruhgsih htiiesphhhhihsihhkrdhfuhdqsggvrhhlihhnrdguvgdprhgtphhtthhopehgvggvrhht sehlihhnuhigqdhmieekkhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopegtlheslhhinhhugidrtghomh dprhgtphhtthhopehpvghnsggvrhhgsehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehr ihgvnhhtjhgvshesghhoohhglhgvrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepihgrmhhjohhonhhsoh hordhkihhmsehlghgvrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtoheprghkphhmsehlihhnuhigqdhfohhu nhgurghtihhonhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehvsggrsghkrgesshhushgvrdgtiidprh gtphhtthhopehrohhmrghnrdhguhhshhgthhhinheslhhinhhugidruggvvh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i58a146ae:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 21 Nov 2024 21:11:45 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 13:12:15 +1100 (AEDT) From: Finn Thain To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , Andrew Morton , Vlastimil Babka , Roman Gushchin , Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>, Jens Axboe , Pavel Begunkov , Mike@rox.of.borg, Rapoport@rox.of.borg, Christian Brauner , Guenter Roeck , Kees Cook , Jann Horn , linux-mm@kvack.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab: Fix too strict alignment check in create_cache() In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <80c767a5d5927c099aea5178fbf2c897b459fa90.1732106544.git.geert@linux-m68k.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Stat-Signature: w3onp3r3k9dzxfutccq6tno4tty76ckp X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: E623420015 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam08 X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1732241486-686039 X-HE-Meta: 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 npUAQJD1 E/qQwFnFE5HJstC6QKYKOGFntXqb3t685kIQdrIFcya2jVu2IDoYGuzCkHpSGRHOKDN9FFklgy3jIfXzney+8XdtmfQ15Zazkjk2orQaIGEHG1+3sJwyPAL2ALabx+WwsYvU93xV4uc4jJvqQiNM6En+7bGjQGilhulEC3j0PDRyBvTK7xGROX6UYAO9sg4scIeX6n/Bd4Z1VNH0NFbrdbOX5rAqg6Ro3whXhl2akro0T+aBk84m/8Hbu9WK7BAKK2IBF8GdJ6bbBgHZH2f92dh30TKeZfzxKGQJwlg1mN29dBHR+FVSoYWUAr2XDO0D9K3ug3KbqBeTWV4n8aZWroxx7/fZkB9bgOl0eUBBJ1p2D9qlyj1KfR2bcFlQPtmT4Ndto X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, 21 Nov 2024, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On Wed, 2024-11-20 at 13:46 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On m68k, where the minimum alignment of unsigned long is 2 bytes: > > Well, well, well, my old friend strikes again ;-). > > These will always come up until we fix the alignment issue on m68k. > Hmmm. That patch you're replying too. Does it make the kernel source code better or worse?