linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org, riel@surriel.com, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
	roman.gushchin@linux.dev, yuzhao@google.com, baohua@kernel.org,
	ryan.roberts@arm.com, rppt@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org,
	cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com, corbet@lwn.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] mm: split underutilized THPs
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 15:25:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dccf0806-0627-4deb-850e-367689af5b0a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f6e1e0a-6132-4222-abb6-133224e11009@redhat.com>



On 09/08/2024 14:21, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 09.08.24 12:31, Usama Arif wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/08/2024 16:55, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 07.08.24 15:46, Usama Arif wrote:
>>>> This is an attempt to mitigate the issue of running out of memory when THP
>>>> is always enabled. During runtime whenever a THP is being faulted in
>>>> (__do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page) or collapsed by khugepaged
>>>> (collapse_huge_page), the THP is added to  _deferred_list. Whenever memory
>>>> reclaim happens in linux, the kernel runs the deferred_split
>>>> shrinker which goes through the _deferred_list.
>>>>
>>>> If the folio was partially mapped, the shrinker attempts to split it.
>>>> A new boolean is added to be able to distinguish between partially
>>>> mapped folios and others in the deferred_list at split time in
>>>> deferred_split_scan. Its needed as __folio_remove_rmap decrements
>>>> the folio mapcount elements, hence it won't be possible to distinguish
>>>> between partially mapped folios and others in deferred_split_scan
>>>> without the boolean.
>>>
>>> Just so I get this right: Are you saying that we might now add fully mapped folios to the deferred split queue and that's what you want to distinguish?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>>>
>>> If that's the case, then could we use a bit in folio->_flags_1 instead?
>> Yes, thats a good idea. Will create the below flag for the next revision
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/page-flags.h b/include/linux/page-flags.h
>> index 5769fe6e4950..5825bd1cf6db 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/page-flags.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h
>> @@ -189,6 +189,11 @@ enum pageflags {
>>     #define PAGEFLAGS_MASK         ((1UL << NR_PAGEFLAGS) - 1)
>>   +enum folioflags_1 {
>> +       /* The first 8 bits of folio->_flags_1 are used to keep track of folio order */
>> +       FOLIO_PARTIALLY_MAPPED = 8,     /* folio is partially mapped */
>> +}
> 
> This might be what you want to achieve:
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/page-flags.h b/include/linux/page-flags.h
> index a0a29bd092f8..d4722ed60ef8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/page-flags.h
> +++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h
> @@ -182,6 +182,7 @@ enum pageflags {
>         /* At least one page in this folio has the hwpoison flag set */
>         PG_has_hwpoisoned = PG_active,
>         PG_large_rmappable = PG_workingset, /* anon or file-backed */
> +       PG_partially_mapped, /* was identified to be partially mapped */
>  };
>  
>  #define PAGEFLAGS_MASK         ((1UL << NR_PAGEFLAGS) - 1)
> @@ -861,8 +862,9 @@ static inline void ClearPageCompound(struct page *page)
>         ClearPageHead(page);
>  }
>  FOLIO_FLAG(large_rmappable, FOLIO_SECOND_PAGE)
> +FOLIO_FLAG(partially_mapped, FOLIO_SECOND_PAGE)
>  #else
> -FOLIO_FLAG_FALSE(large_rmappable)
> +FOLIO_FLAG_FALSE(partially_mapped)
>  #endif
>  
>  #define PG_head_mask ((1UL << PG_head))
> 
> The downside is an atomic op to set/clear, but it should likely not really matter
> (initially, the flag will be clear, and we should only ever set it once when
> partially unmapping). If it hurts, we can reconsider.
> 
> [...]

I was looking for where the bits for flags_1 were specified! I just saw the start of enum pageflags, saw that compound order isn't specified anywhere over there and ignored the end :)

Yes, this is what I wanted to do. Thanks.



  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-09 14:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20240807134732.3292797-1-usamaarif642@gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <20240807134732.3292797-3-usamaarif642@gmail.com>
     [not found]   ` <20240807200241.GB1828817@cmpxchg.org>
2024-08-08 15:53     ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: remap unused subpages to shared zeropage when splitting isolated thp Usama Arif
     [not found] ` <20240807134732.3292797-5-usamaarif642@gmail.com>
2024-08-08 15:55   ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mm: split underutilized THPs David Hildenbrand
2024-08-09 10:31     ` Usama Arif
2024-08-09 13:21       ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-09 14:25         ` Usama Arif [this message]
     [not found] ` <20240807134732.3292797-2-usamaarif642@gmail.com>
2024-08-08 15:56   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: free zapped tail pages when splitting isolated thp David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dccf0806-0627-4deb-850e-367689af5b0a@gmail.com \
    --to=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yuzhao@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox