linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aneesh Kumar K V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	ying.huang@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dave.hansen@intel.com,
	tim.c.chen@intel.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan: respect cpuset policy during page demotion
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 13:19:48 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc453287-015d-fd1c-fe7f-6ee45772d6aa@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221026074343.6517-1-feng.tang@intel.com>

On 10/26/22 1:13 PM, Feng Tang wrote:
> In page reclaim path, memory could be demoted from faster memory tier
> to slower memory tier. Currently, there is no check about cpuset's
> memory policy, that even if the target demotion node is not allowd
> by cpuset, the demotion will still happen, which breaks the cpuset
> semantics.
> 
> So add cpuset policy check in the demotion path and skip demotion
> if the demotion targets are not allowed by cpuset.
> 

What about the vma policy or the task memory policy? Shouldn't we respect
those memory policy restrictions while demoting the page? 

-aneesh


  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-26  7:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-26  7:43 Feng Tang
2022-10-26  7:49 ` Aneesh Kumar K V [this message]
2022-10-26  8:00   ` Feng Tang
2022-10-26  9:19     ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-26 10:42       ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-10-26 11:02         ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-26 12:08           ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-10-26 12:21             ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-26 12:35               ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-10-27  9:02                 ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-27 10:16                   ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-10-27 13:05                     ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-26 12:20       ` Feng Tang
2022-10-26 15:59         ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-26 17:57           ` Yang Shi
2022-10-27  7:11             ` Feng Tang
2022-10-27  7:45               ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-27  7:51                 ` Feng Tang
2022-10-27 17:55               ` Yang Shi
2022-10-28  3:37                 ` Feng Tang
2022-10-28  5:54                   ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-28 17:23                     ` Yang Shi
2022-10-31  1:56                       ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-31  2:19                       ` Feng Tang
2022-10-28  5:09                 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-10-28 17:16                   ` Yang Shi
2022-10-31  1:53                     ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-27  6:47           ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-27  7:10             ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-27  7:39               ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-27  8:01                 ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-27  9:31                   ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-27 12:29                     ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-27 23:22                       ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-31  8:40                         ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-31  8:51                           ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-31  9:18                             ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-31 14:09                           ` Feng Tang
2022-10-31 14:32                             ` Michal Hocko
2022-11-07  8:05                               ` Feng Tang
2022-11-07  8:17                                 ` Michal Hocko
2022-11-01  3:17                     ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-26  8:26 ` Yin, Fengwei
2022-10-26  8:37   ` Feng Tang
2022-10-26 14:36 ` Waiman Long
2022-10-27  5:57   ` Feng Tang
2022-10-27  5:13 ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-27  5:49   ` Feng Tang
2022-10-27  6:05     ` Huang, Ying

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dc453287-015d-fd1c-fe7f-6ee45772d6aa@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox