From: Jinjiang Tu <tujinjiang@huawei.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>, <yuzhao@google.com>,
<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/contig_alloc: fix alloc_contig_range when __GFP_COMP and order < MAX_ORDER
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 20:14:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dab946c6-c24f-d031-6517-5a62ff65b789@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3016b046-c76f-4e58-9503-33606613e2f5@redhat.com>
在 2025/5/28 16:43, David Hildenbrand 写道:
> On 28.05.25 04:19, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Mon, 12 May 2025 09:13:31 +0800 Jinjiang Tu
>> <tujinjiang@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The change below makes the code cleaner. Acked-by: Zi Yan
>>>>> <ziy@nvidia.com>
>>>>
>>>> Jinjiang, can you integrate that into your patch and resend?
>>>
>>> Sorry for late reply. I will do it today.
>>>
>>
>> As far as I know, this is still pending. The patch does address a
>> WARN() and it's cc:stable, so it's rather important.
>>
>> I'll move the v2 patch back into mm-new and shall keep it there to
>> remind me to bug people about it ;)
>>
>>
>> David (and everyone!), please don't be afraid to grab someone else's
>> patch, apply changes and send it in. Stuff happens, and doing this
>> is well
>> within accepted processes.
>
> I would usually do that if (a) there would be a reproducer that I can
> test with and (b) I would find some spare time.
>
> Given that I don't consider this urgent (no in-tree user ...), I would
> hope that the original submitter can just ... send a properly tested
> patch that includes review feedback.
>
> Maybe best to drop this patch for now completely. In that case, I
> might just send a patch to fail any non-aligned / too small GFP_COMP
> allocation early, instead of adding support for it.
Thanks, I will send a patch to fail in such case simply.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-28 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-21 1:36 Jinjiang Tu
2025-04-21 1:52 ` Zi Yan
2025-04-25 10:33 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-25 11:04 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-11 8:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-12 1:13 ` Jinjiang Tu
2025-05-28 2:19 ` Andrew Morton
2025-05-28 2:25 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-28 2:58 ` Jinjiang Tu
2025-05-28 8:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-28 12:14 ` Jinjiang Tu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dab946c6-c24f-d031-6517-5a62ff65b789@huawei.com \
--to=tujinjiang@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox