From: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Li Xinhai <lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
akpm <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lixinhai_lxh <lixinhai_lxh@126.com>
Subject: Re: mbind() breaks its API definition since v5.2 by commit d883544515aa (mm: mempolicy: make the behavior consistent when MPOL_MF_MOVE* and MPOL_MF_STRICT were specified)
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 21:32:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <da734171-bd69-b56b-2ca9-3038790155dd@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2019103011122763779044@gmail.com>
On 10/29/19 8:12 PM, Li Xinhai wrote:
> On 2019-10-30 at 10:50 Yang Shi wrote:
>>
>> On 10/29/19 7:27 PM, Li Xinhai wrote:
>>> One change in do_mbind() of this commit has suspicious usage of return value of
>>> queue_pages_range(), excerpt as below:
>>>
>>> ---
>>> @@ -1243,10 +1265,15 @@ static long do_mbind(unsigned long start, unsigned long len,
>>> if (err)
>>> goto mpol_out;
>>>
>>> - err = queue_pages_range(mm, start, end, nmask,
>>> + ret = queue_pages_range(mm, start, end, nmask,
>>> flags | MPOL_MF_INVERT, &pagelist);
>>> - if (!err)
>>> - err = mbind_range(mm, start, end, new);
>>> +
>>> + if (ret < 0) { /////// convert to all possible 'ret' to '-EIO' <<<<
>>> + err = -EIO;
>>> + goto up_out;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + err = mbind_range(mm, start, end, new);
>>>
>>> if (!err) {
>>> int nr_failed = 0;
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Note that inside queue_pages_range(), the call to walk_page_range() may return
>>> errors from 'test_walk' of 'struct mm_walk_ops', e.g. -EFAULT. Now, those error
>>> codes are no longer reported to user space application.
>>>
>>> From user space, the mbind() call need to reported error, with EFAULT, as example:
>>> EFAULT
>>> Part or all of the memory range specified by nodemask and maxnode points
>>> outside your accessible address space. Or, there was an unmapped hole in the
>>> specified memory range specified by addr and len.
>> Thanks for catching this. That commit was aimed to correct the return
>> values for some corner cases in mbind(), but it should not alter the
>> errno for other failure cases, i.e. -EFAULT.
>>
>> Could you please try the below patch (build test only)?
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
>> index 4ae967b..99df43a 100644
>> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
>> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
>> @@ -1286,7 +1286,7 @@ static long do_mbind(unsigned long start, unsigned
>> long len,
>> flags | MPOL_MF_INVERT, &pagelist);
>>
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> - err = -EIO;
>> + err = ret;
>> goto up_out;
>> }
>>
>>
> This seems do not work, because the 'pagelist' would have some pages queued
> into it, need to put back those pages instead of return quickly.
>
> So, we need to remove this page leak as well. <<<<<<
>
> In my understanding, revert the changes as I quoted above may solve it, but not sure
> the details about changes at end of do_mbind(), should keep them at there without
> further change?
Thanks for pointing this out. We don't have to revert this commit to
handle the non-empty pagelist correctly. The simplest way is to just put
those pages back and I'm supposed this is also the preferred way since
mbind_range() is not called to really apply the policy so those pages
should not be migrated.
The below patch should solve this:
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 4ae967b..d80025c 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -1286,7 +1286,10 @@ static long do_mbind(unsigned long start,
unsigned long len,
flags | MPOL_MF_INVERT, &pagelist);
if (ret < 0) {
- err = -EIO;
+ if (!list_empty(&pagelist))
+ putback_movable_pages(&pagelist);
+
+ err = ret;
goto up_out;
}
>
> - Xinhai
>
>>> Please correct me if this is the intended change(and will have updated API
>>> definition), or something was misunderstood.
>>>
>>> -Xinhai
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-30 4:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-30 2:27 Li Xinhai
2019-10-30 2:50 ` Yang Shi
2019-10-30 3:12 ` Li Xinhai
2019-10-30 4:32 ` Yang Shi [this message]
2019-10-30 5:59 ` Li Xinhai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=da734171-bd69-b56b-2ca9-3038790155dd@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com \
--cc=lixinhai_lxh@126.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox