linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	muchun.song@linux.dev, osalvador@suse.de, linmiaohe@huawei.com,
	jiaqiyan@google.com, william.roche@oracle.com,
	rientjes@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com,
	rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com,
	willy@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mm/memory-failure: fix missing ->mf_stats count in hugetlb poison
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 09:50:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d9e09523-2b61-4280-876e-95be787258f5@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251223012113.370674-1-jane.chu@oracle.com>

On 12/23/25 02:21, Jane Chu wrote:
> When a newly poisoned subpage ends up in an already poisoned hugetlb
> folio, 'num_poisoned_pages' is incremented, but the per node ->mf_stats
> is not. Fix the inconsistency by designating action_result() to update
> them both.
> 
> While at it, define __get_huge_page_for_hwpoison() return values in terms
> of symbol names for better readibility. Also rename
> folio_set_hugetlb_hwpoison() to hugetlb_update_hwpoison() since the
> function does more than the conventional bit setting and the fact
> three possible return values are expected.
> 
> Fixes: 18f41fa616ee4 ("mm: memory-failure: bump memory failure stats to pglist_data")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
> ---
> v2 -> v3:
>    No change.
> v1 -> v2:
>    adapted David and Liam's comment, define __get_huge_page_for_hwpoison()
> return values in terms of symbol names instead of naked integers for better
> readibility.  #define instead of enum is used since the function has footprint
> outside MF, just try to limit the MF specifics local.
>    also renamed folio_set_hugetlb_hwpoison() to hugetlb_update_hwpoison()
> since the function does more than the conventional bit setting and the
> fact three possible return values are expected.
> 
> ---
>   mm/memory-failure.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>   1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index fbc5a01260c8..8b47e8a1b12d 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -1883,12 +1883,18 @@ static unsigned long __folio_free_raw_hwp(struct folio *folio, bool move_flag)
>   	return count;
>   }
>   
> -static int folio_set_hugetlb_hwpoison(struct folio *folio, struct page *page)
> +#define	MF_HUGETLB_ALREADY_POISONED	3  /* already poisoned */
> +#define	MF_HUGETLB_ACC_EXISTING_POISON	4  /* accessed existing poisoned page */

What happened to the idea of using an enum?


> +/*
> + * Set hugetlb folio as hwpoisoned, update folio private raw hwpoison list
> + * to keep track of the poisoned pages.
> + */
> +static int hugetlb_update_hwpoison(struct folio *folio, struct page *page)
>   {
>   	struct llist_head *head;
>   	struct raw_hwp_page *raw_hwp;
>   	struct raw_hwp_page *p;
> -	int ret = folio_test_set_hwpoison(folio) ? -EHWPOISON : 0;
> +	int ret = folio_test_set_hwpoison(folio) ? MF_HUGETLB_ALREADY_POISONED : 0;
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * Once the hwpoison hugepage has lost reliable raw error info,
> @@ -1896,20 +1902,18 @@ static int folio_set_hugetlb_hwpoison(struct folio *folio, struct page *page)
>   	 * so skip to add additional raw error info.
>   	 */
>   	if (folio_test_hugetlb_raw_hwp_unreliable(folio))
> -		return -EHWPOISON;
> +		return MF_HUGETLB_ALREADY_POISONED;
> +
>   	head = raw_hwp_list_head(folio);
>   	llist_for_each_entry(p, head->first, node) {
>   		if (p->page == page)
> -			return -EHWPOISON;
> +			return MF_HUGETLB_ACC_EXISTING_POISON;
>   	}
>   
>   	raw_hwp = kmalloc(sizeof(struct raw_hwp_page), GFP_ATOMIC);
>   	if (raw_hwp) {
>   		raw_hwp->page = page;
>   		llist_add(&raw_hwp->node, head);
> -		/* the first error event will be counted in action_result(). */
> -		if (ret)
> -			num_poisoned_pages_inc(page_to_pfn(page));
>   	} else {
>   		/*
>   		 * Failed to save raw error info.  We no longer trace all
> @@ -1955,32 +1959,30 @@ void folio_clear_hugetlb_hwpoison(struct folio *folio)
>   	folio_free_raw_hwp(folio, true);
>   }
>   
> +#define	MF_HUGETLB_FREED			0	/* freed hugepage */
> +#define	MF_HUGETLB_IN_USED			1	/* in-use hugepage */
> +#define	MF_NOT_HUGETLB				2	/* not a hugepage */

If you're already dealing with negative error codes, "MF_NOT_HUGETLB" nicely
translated to -EINVAL.

But I wonder if it would be cleaner to just define all values in an enum and return
that enum instead of an int from the functions.

enum md_hugetlb_status {
	MF_HUGETLB_INVALID,		/* not a hugetlb folio */
	MF_HUGETLB_BUSY,		/* busy, retry later */
	MF_HUGETLB_FREED,		/* hugetlb folio was freed */
	MF_HUGETLB_IN_USED,		/* ??? no idea what that really means */
	MF_HUGETLB_FOLIO_PRE_POISONED,	/* folio already poisoned, per-page information unclear */
	MF_HUGETLB_PAGE_PRE_POISONED,	/* exact page already poisoned */
}

-- 
Cheers

David


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-23  8:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-23  1:21 Jane Chu
2025-12-23  1:21 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mm/memory-failure: teach kill_accessing_process to accept hugetlb tail page pfn Jane Chu
2025-12-23  9:13   ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-23 18:17     ` jane.chu
2025-12-23  8:50 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) [this message]
2025-12-23 18:28   ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mm/memory-failure: fix missing ->mf_stats count in hugetlb poison jane.chu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d9e09523-2b61-4280-876e-95be787258f5@kernel.org \
    --to=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
    --cc=jiaqiyan@google.com \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=william.roche@oracle.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox