Re: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] mm/memory-failure: don't allow to unpoison hw corrupted page

[zhenwei pi <pizhenwei@bytedance.com>]

On 6/10/22 20:12, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 10.06.22 13:46, zhenwei pi wrote:
>> Currently unpoison_memory(unsigned long pfn) is designed for soft
>> poison(hwpoison-inject) only. Since 17fae1294ad9d, the KPTE gets
>> cleared on a x86 platform once hardware memory corrupts.
>>
>> Unpoisoning a hardware corrupted page puts page back buddy only,
>> the kernel has a chance to access the page with *NOT PRESENT* KPTE.
>> This leads BUG during accessing on the corrupted KPTE.
>>
>> Do not allow to unpoison hardware corrupted page in unpoison_memory() to
>> avoid BUG like this:
>>
>>   Unpoison: Software-unpoisoned page 0x61234
>>   BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffff888061234000
>>   #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
>>   #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
>>   PGD 2c01067 P4D 2c01067 PUD 107267063 PMD 10382b063 PTE 800fffff9edcb062
>>   Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
>>   CPU: 4 PID: 26551 Comm: stress Kdump: loaded Tainted: G   M       OE     5.18.0.bm.1-amd64 #7
>>   Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) ...
>>   RIP: 0010:clear_page_erms+0x7/0x10
>>   Code: ...
>>   RSP: 0000:ffffc90001107bc8 EFLAGS: 00010246
>>   RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000901 RCX: 0000000000001000
>>   RDX: ffffea0001848d00 RSI: ffffea0001848d40 RDI: ffff888061234000
>>   RBP: ffffea0001848d00 R08: 0000000000000901 R09: 0000000000001276
>>   R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000001
>>   R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000140dca R15: 0000000000000001
>>   FS:  00007fd8b2333740(0000) GS:ffff88813fd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>>   CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>>   CR2: ffff888061234000 CR3: 00000001023d2005 CR4: 0000000000770ee0
>>   DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>>   DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>>   PKRU: 55555554
>>   Call Trace:
>>    <TASK>
>>    prep_new_page+0x151/0x170
>>    get_page_from_freelist+0xca0/0xe20
>>    ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xab/0xc0
>>    ? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1b/0x20
>>    __alloc_pages+0x17e/0x340
>>    __folio_alloc+0x17/0x40
>>    vma_alloc_folio+0x84/0x280
>>    __handle_mm_fault+0x8d4/0xeb0
>>    handle_mm_fault+0xd5/0x2a0
>>    do_user_addr_fault+0x1d0/0x680
>>    ? kvm_read_and_reset_apf_flags+0x3b/0x50
>>    exc_page_fault+0x78/0x170
>>    asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30
>>
>> Fixes: 847ce401df392 ("HWPOISON: Add unpoisoning support")
>> Fixes: 17fae1294ad9d ("x86/{mce,mm}: Unmap the entire page if the whole page is affected and poisoned")
>> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
>> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: zhenwei pi <pizhenwei@bytedance.com>
>> ---
>>   mm/memory-failure.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 59 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
>> index b85661cbdc4a..3124f428302c 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
>> @@ -2068,6 +2068,58 @@ static int __init memory_failure_init(void)
>>   }
>>   core_initcall(memory_failure_init);
>>   
>> +/*
>> + * Unpoisoning a hardware corrupted page with *NOT PRESENT* KPTE leads panic.
>> + * Test a page is valid in the kernel mapping.
>> + */
>> +static bool kmap_valid(struct page *page)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)page_to_virt(page);
>> +	pgd_t *pgd;
>> +	p4d_t *p4d;
>> +	pud_t *pud;
>> +	pmd_t *pmd;
>> +	pte_t *pte;
>> +
>> +	pgd = pgd_offset_k(addr);
>> +	if (pgd_none(*pgd))
>> +		return false;
>> +	if (pgd_leaf(*pgd))
>> +		return true;
>> +	if (pgd_bad(*pgd))
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	p4d = p4d_offset(pgd, addr);
>> +	if (p4d_none(*p4d))
>> +		return false;
>> +	if (p4d_leaf(*p4d))
>> +		return true;
>> +	if (p4d_bad(*p4d))
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	pud = pud_offset(p4d, addr);
>> +	if (pud_none(*pud))
>> +		return false;
>> +	if (pud_leaf(*pud))
>> +		return true;
>> +	if (pud_bad(*pud))
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
>> +	if (pmd_none(*pmd))
>> +		return false;
>> +	if (pmd_leaf(*pmd))
>> +		return true;
>> +	if (pmd_bad(*pmd))
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	pte = pte_offset_map(pmd, addr);
>> +	if (pte_none(*pte) || !pte_present(*pte))
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	return true;
>> +}
>> +
>>   #define unpoison_pr_info(fmt, pfn, rs)			\
>>   ({							\
>>   	if (__ratelimit(rs))				\
>> @@ -2109,6 +2161,13 @@ int unpoison_memory(unsigned long pfn)
>>   		goto unlock_mutex;
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	if (!kmap_valid(page)) {
>> +		unpoison_pr_info("Unpoison: Page was hardware poisoned %#lx\n",
>> +				 pfn, &unpoison_rs);
>> +		ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +		goto unlock_mutex;
>> +	}
>> +
>>   	if (page_count(page) > 1) {
>>   		unpoison_pr_info("Unpoison: Someone grabs the hwpoison page %#lx\n",
>>   				 pfn, &unpoison_rs);
> 
> I really prefer just disabling the unpoisioning mechanism in case there
> is a real hw injected error.
> 

Hi, Naoya & Andrew

What is your opinion?

-- 
zhenwei pi