From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Aishwarya TCV <Aishwarya.TCV@arm.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] selftests/mm: Log run_vmtests.sh results in TAP format
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 18:25:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d99367ef-72e0-48ad-ba83-45e25efdf0fc@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76abe3b9-3f66-4336-b09d-d5c137ff6582@arm.com>
On 12/15/23 06:28, Ryan Roberts wrote:
...
> I've kept all the existing "pretty" output and results summary as is, it just
> gets a hash in front of it when TAP is enabled.
>
> so this:
>
> -----------------------
> running ./hugepage-mmap
> -----------------------
> Returned address is 0xffff89e00000
> First hex is 0
> First hex is 3020100
> [PASS]
> SUMMARY: PASS=1 SKIP=0 FAIL=0
>
> becomes this:
>
> TAP version 13
> # -----------------------
> # running ./hugepage-mmap
> # -----------------------
> # Returned address is 0xffff89e00000
> # First hex is 0
> # First hex is 3020100
> # [PASS]
> ok 1 hugepage-mmap
> # SUMMARY: PASS=1 SKIP=0 FAIL=0
> 1..1
>
> If you think the latter is ofensive, then I can do the wrapping as you suggest.
I applied this and ran the tests, all while carefully reminding myself
to "think like a human". :) And from that perspective, to me, the output
is effectively the same: the leading '#' characters do not really change
anything, from a readability point of view.
So IMHO you're on perfectly solid ground, if you just switch over
directly to this format.
Tested-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-16 2:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-14 16:24 Ryan Roberts
2023-12-15 13:54 ` Mark Brown
2023-12-15 13:58 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-12-15 14:08 ` Mark Brown
2023-12-15 14:28 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-12-15 14:34 ` Mark Brown
2023-12-16 2:25 ` John Hubbard [this message]
2023-12-16 2:40 ` John Hubbard
2023-12-18 11:32 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-12-19 0:51 ` John Hubbard
2023-12-19 0:55 ` John Hubbard
2023-12-19 8:33 ` Ryan Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d99367ef-72e0-48ad-ba83-45e25efdf0fc@nvidia.com \
--to=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=Aishwarya.TCV@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox