From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
david@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] mm/compaction: simplify pfn iteration in isolate_freepages_range
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 19:58:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d9403099-7fa8-ba34-4260-21da36175432@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3574ed6e-34c8-47a1-8218-9e4cf1327184@huaweicloud.com>
On 8/15/2023 6:37 PM, Kemeng Shi wrote:
>
>
> on 8/15/2023 6:07 PM, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/15/2023 5:32 PM, Kemeng Shi wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> on 8/15/2023 4:38 PM, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 8/5/2023 7:07 PM, Kemeng Shi wrote:
>>>>> We call isolate_freepages_block in strict mode, continuous pages in
>>>>> pageblock will be isolated if isolate_freepages_block successed.
>>>>> Then pfn + isolated will point to start of next pageblock to scan
>>>>> no matter how many pageblocks are isolated in isolate_freepages_block.
>>>>> Use pfn + isolated as start of next pageblock to scan to simplify the
>>>>> iteration.
>>>>
>>>> IIUC, the isolate_freepages_block() can isolate high-order free pages, which means the pfn + isolated can be larger than the block_end_pfn. So in your patch, the 'block_start_pfn' and 'block_end_pfn' can be in different pageblocks, that will break pageblock_pfn_to_page().
>>>>
>>> In for update statement, we always update block_start_pfn to pfn and
>>
>> I mean, you changed to:
>> 1) pfn += isolated;
>> 2) block_start_pfn = pfn;
>> 3) block_end_pfn = pfn + pageblock_nr_pages;
>>
>> But in 1) pfn + isolated can go outside of the currnet pageblock if isolating a high-order page, for example, located in the middle of the next pageblock. So that the block_start_pfn can point to the middle of the next pageblock, not the start position. Meanwhile after 3), the block_end_pfn can point another pageblock. Or I missed something else?
>>
> Ah, I miss to explain this in changelog.
> In case we could we have buddy page with order higher than pageblock:
> 1. page in buddy page is aligned with it's order
> 2. order of page is higher than pageblock order
> Then page is aligned with pageblock order. So pfn of page and isolated pages
> count are both aligned pageblock order. So pfn + isolated is pageblock order
> aligned.
That's not what I mean. pfn + isolated is not always pageblock-aligned,
since the isolate_freepages_block() can isolated high-order free pages
(for example: order-1, order-2 ...).
Suppose the pageblock size is 2M, when isolating a pageblock (suppose
the pfn range is 0 - 511 to make the arithmetic easy) by
isolate_freepages_block(), and suppose pfn 0 to pfn 510 are all order-0
page, but pfn 511 is order-1 page, so you will isolate 513 pages from
this pageblock, which will make 'pfn + isolated' not pageblock aligned.
>>> update block_end_pfn to pfn + pageblock_nr_pages. So they should point
>>> to the same pageblock. I guess you missed the change to update of
>>> block_end_pfn. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> mm/compaction.c | 14 ++------------
>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
>>>>> index 684f6e6cd8bc..8d7d38073d30 100644
>>>>> --- a/mm/compaction.c
>>>>> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
>>>>> @@ -733,21 +733,11 @@ isolate_freepages_range(struct compact_control *cc,
>>>>> block_end_pfn = pageblock_end_pfn(pfn);
>>>>> for (; pfn < end_pfn; pfn += isolated,
>>>>> - block_start_pfn = block_end_pfn,
>>>>> - block_end_pfn += pageblock_nr_pages) {
>>>>> + block_start_pfn = pfn,
>>>>> + block_end_pfn = pfn + pageblock_nr_pages) {
>>>>> /* Protect pfn from changing by isolate_freepages_block */
>>>>> unsigned long isolate_start_pfn = pfn;
>>>>> - /*
>>>>> - * pfn could pass the block_end_pfn if isolated freepage
>>>>> - * is more than pageblock order. In this case, we adjust
>>>>> - * scanning range to right one.
>>>>> - */
>>>>> - if (pfn >= block_end_pfn) {
>>>>> - block_start_pfn = pageblock_start_pfn(pfn);
>>>>> - block_end_pfn = pageblock_end_pfn(pfn);
>>>>> - }
>>>>> -
>>>>> block_end_pfn = min(block_end_pfn, end_pfn);
>>>>> if (!pageblock_pfn_to_page(block_start_pfn,
>>>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-19 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-05 11:07 [PATCH 0/9] Fixes and cleanups to compaction Kemeng Shi
2023-08-05 3:14 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-05 4:07 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-05 11:07 ` [PATCH 2/9] mm/compaction: call list_is_{first}/{last} more intuitively in move_freelist_{head}/{tail} Kemeng Shi
2023-08-15 7:49 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-05 11:07 ` [PATCH 5/9] mm/compaction: remove repeat compact_blockskip_flush check in reset_isolation_suitable Kemeng Shi
2023-08-15 8:42 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-05 11:07 ` [PATCH 6/9] mm/compaction: rename is_via_compact_memory to compaction_with_allocation_order Kemeng Shi
2023-08-15 8:58 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-15 12:04 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-19 12:14 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-22 1:51 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-24 2:20 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-05 11:07 ` [PATCH 7/9] mm/compaction: factor out code to test if we should run compaction for target order Kemeng Shi
2023-08-15 8:53 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-15 12:10 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-19 12:27 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-22 1:57 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-24 2:25 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-24 2:59 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-05 11:07 ` [PATCH 9/9] mm/compaction: call compaction_suit_allocation_order in kcompactd_do_work Kemeng Shi
[not found] ` <20230805110711.2975149-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
2023-08-05 17:11 ` [PATCH 1/9] mm/compaction: use correct list in move_freelist_{head}/{tail} Andrew Morton
2023-08-07 0:37 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-15 7:16 ` Baolin Wang
[not found] ` <20230805110711.2975149-4-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
2023-08-15 8:28 ` [PATCH 3/9] mm/compaction: correctly return failure with bogus compound_order in strict mode Baolin Wang
2023-08-15 9:22 ` Kemeng Shi
[not found] ` <20230805110711.2975149-5-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
2023-08-15 8:38 ` [PATCH 4/9] mm/compaction: simplify pfn iteration in isolate_freepages_range Baolin Wang
2023-08-15 9:32 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-15 10:07 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-15 10:37 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-19 11:58 ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2023-08-22 1:37 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-24 2:19 ` Baolin Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d9403099-7fa8-ba34-4260-21da36175432@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox