From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: shuah@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Anshuman.Khandual@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/mm: Confirm VA exhaustion without reliance on correctness of mmap()
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:42:47 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d91c8c36-b01d-48f9-b0f6-8faa58edaed0@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240321145146.a3ce8a1e247371e33a437978@linux-foundation.org>
On 3/22/24 03:21, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 16:05:22 +0530 Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com> wrote:
>
>> Currently, VA exhaustion is being checked by passing a hint to mmap() and
>> expecting it to fail. This patch makes a stricter test by successful write()
>> calls from /proc/self/maps to a dump file, confirming that a free chunk is
>> indeed not available.
> What's wrong with the current approach?
While populating the lower VA space, mmap() fails because we have
exhausted the space.
Then, in validate_lower_address_hint(), because mmap() fails, we confirm
that we have
indeed exhausted the space. There is a circular logic involved here.
Assume that there is a bug in mmap(), also assume that it exists
independent of whether
you pass a hint address or not; that for some reason it is not able to
find a 1GB chunk.
My idea is to assert the exhaustion against some other method.
Also, in the following line in validate_complete_va_space():
if (start_addr - prev_end_addr >= SZ_1GB)
I made a small error, I forgot to use MAP_CHUNK_SIZE instead of SZ_1GB.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-22 5:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-21 10:35 Dev Jain
2024-03-21 21:51 ` Andrew Morton
2024-03-22 5:12 ` Dev Jain [this message]
2024-03-22 19:19 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d91c8c36-b01d-48f9-b0f6-8faa58edaed0@arm.com \
--to=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=Anshuman.Khandual@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox