From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f70.google.com (mail-wm0-f70.google.com [74.125.82.70]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2776B6B029E for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 17:51:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f70.google.com with SMTP id 79so77006553wmy.6 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:51:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id xy10si32205351wjb.253.2016.10.31.14.51.52 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:51:52 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: More OOM problems References: <20160930214448.GB28379@dhcp22.suse.cz> <982671bd-5733-0cd5-c15d-112648ff14c5@Quantum.com> <20161011064426.GA31996@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20161030041723.GA4767@hostway.ca> From: Vlastimil Babka Message-ID: Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 22:51:40 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Simon Kirby Cc: Michal Hocko , Ralf-Peter Rohbeck , Linus Torvalds , Tetsuo Handa , Oleg Nesterov , Vladimir Davydov , Andrew Morton , Markus Trippelsdorf , Arkadiusz Miskiewicz , Jiri Slaby , Olaf Hering , Joonsoo Kim , linux-mm On 10/31/2016 10:41 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > In any case, it's still bad for 4.8 then. > Can you send /proc/vmstat from the system with an uptime that already > experienced at least one such oom? Oh, and it might make sense to try the patch at the end of this e-mail: https://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=147423605024993 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org