From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: anshuman.khandual@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
cl@gentwo.org, vbabka@suse.cz, mhocko@suse.com,
apopple@nvidia.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, will@kernel.org,
baohua@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, srivatsa@csail.mit.edu,
haowenchao22@gmail.com, hughd@google.com,
aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, yang@os.amperecomputing.com,
peterx@redhat.com, ioworker0@gmail.com,
wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, ziy@nvidia.com, jglisse@google.com,
surenb@google.com, vishal.moola@gmail.com, zokeefe@google.com,
zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
21cnbao@gmail.com, willy@infradead.org,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, david@redhat.com,
aarcange@redhat.com, raquini@redhat.com, sunnanyong@huawei.com,
usamaarif642@gmail.com, audra@redhat.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, tiwai@suse.de
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 7/9] khugepaged: add mTHP support
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 14:37:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d6d8cc12-6c08-42b1-9baa-d4981299bf28@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0319c841-cde9-42f6-a230-39b050659f1a@arm.com>
On 19/02/25 10:22 pm, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> On 11/02/2025 00:30, Nico Pache wrote:
>> Introduce the ability for khugepaged to collapse to different mTHP sizes.
>> While scanning a PMD range for potential collapse candidates, keep track
>> of pages in MIN_MTHP_ORDER chunks via a bitmap. Each bit represents a
>> utilized region of order MIN_MTHP_ORDER ptes. We remove the restriction
>> of max_ptes_none during the scan phase so we dont bailout early and miss
>> potential mTHP candidates.
>>
>> After the scan is complete we will perform binary recursion on the
>> bitmap to determine which mTHP size would be most efficient to collapse
>> to. max_ptes_none will be scaled by the attempted collapse order to
>> determine how full a THP must be to be eligible.
>>
>> If a mTHP collapse is attempted, but contains swapped out, or shared
>> pages, we dont perform the collapse.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> mm/khugepaged.c | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>> 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
>> index c8048d9ec7fb..cd310989725b 100644
>> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
>> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
>> @@ -1127,13 +1127,14 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
>> {
>> LIST_HEAD(compound_pagelist);
>> pmd_t *pmd, _pmd;
>> - pte_t *pte;
>> + pte_t *pte, mthp_pte;
>> pgtable_t pgtable;
>> struct folio *folio;
>> spinlock_t *pmd_ptl, *pte_ptl;
>> int result = SCAN_FAIL;
>> struct vm_area_struct *vma;
>> struct mmu_notifier_range range;
>> + unsigned long _address = address + offset * PAGE_SIZE;
>> VM_BUG_ON(address & ~HPAGE_PMD_MASK);
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -1148,12 +1149,13 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
>> *mmap_locked = false;
>> }
>>
>> - result = alloc_charge_folio(&folio, mm, cc, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
>> + result = alloc_charge_folio(&folio, mm, cc, order);
>> if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
>> goto out_nolock;
>>
>> mmap_read_lock(mm);
>> - result = hugepage_vma_revalidate(mm, address, true, &vma, cc, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
>> + *mmap_locked = true;
>> + result = hugepage_vma_revalidate(mm, address, true, &vma, cc, order);
>> if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED) {
>> mmap_read_unlock(mm);
>> goto out_nolock;
>> @@ -1171,13 +1173,14 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
>> * released when it fails. So we jump out_nolock directly in
>> * that case. Continuing to collapse causes inconsistency.
>> */
>> - result = __collapse_huge_page_swapin(mm, vma, address, pmd,
>> - referenced, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
>> + result = __collapse_huge_page_swapin(mm, vma, _address, pmd,
>> + referenced, order);
>> if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
>> goto out_nolock;
>> }
>>
>> mmap_read_unlock(mm);
>> + *mmap_locked = false;
>> /*
>> * Prevent all access to pagetables with the exception of
>> * gup_fast later handled by the ptep_clear_flush and the VM
>> @@ -1187,7 +1190,7 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
>> * mmap_lock.
>> */
>> mmap_write_lock(mm);
>> - result = hugepage_vma_revalidate(mm, address, true, &vma, cc, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
>> + result = hugepage_vma_revalidate(mm, address, true, &vma, cc, order);
>> if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
>> goto out_up_write;
>> /* check if the pmd is still valid */
>> @@ -1198,11 +1201,12 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
>> vma_start_write(vma);
>> anon_vma_lock_write(vma->anon_vma);
>>
>> - mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR, 0, mm, address,
>> - address + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
>> + mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR, 0, mm, _address,
>> + _address + (PAGE_SIZE << order));
>> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
>>
>> pmd_ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pmd); /* probably unnecessary */
>> +
>> /*
>> * This removes any huge TLB entry from the CPU so we won't allow
>> * huge and small TLB entries for the same virtual address to
>> @@ -1216,10 +1220,10 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
>> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
>> tlb_remove_table_sync_one();
>>
>> - pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, &_pmd, address, &pte_ptl);
>> + pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, &_pmd, _address, &pte_ptl);
>> if (pte) {
>> - result = __collapse_huge_page_isolate(vma, address, pte, cc,
>> - &compound_pagelist, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
>> + result = __collapse_huge_page_isolate(vma, _address, pte, cc,
>> + &compound_pagelist, order);
>> spin_unlock(pte_ptl);
>> } else {
>> result = SCAN_PMD_NULL;
>> @@ -1248,8 +1252,8 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
>> anon_vma_unlock_write(vma->anon_vma);
>>
>> result = __collapse_huge_page_copy(pte, folio, pmd, _pmd,
>> - vma, address, pte_ptl,
>> - &compound_pagelist, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
>> + vma, _address, pte_ptl,
>> + &compound_pagelist, order);
>> pte_unmap(pte);
>> if (unlikely(result != SCAN_SUCCEED))
>> goto out_up_write;
>> @@ -1260,20 +1264,37 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
>> * write.
>> */
>> __folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
>> - pgtable = pmd_pgtable(_pmd);
>> -
>> - _pmd = mk_huge_pmd(&folio->page, vma->vm_page_prot);
>> - _pmd = maybe_pmd_mkwrite(pmd_mkdirty(_pmd), vma);
>> -
>> - spin_lock(pmd_ptl);
>> - BUG_ON(!pmd_none(*pmd));
>> - folio_add_new_anon_rmap(folio, vma, address, RMAP_EXCLUSIVE);
>> - folio_add_lru_vma(folio, vma);
>> - pgtable_trans_huge_deposit(mm, pmd, pgtable);
>> - set_pmd_at(mm, address, pmd, _pmd);
>> - update_mmu_cache_pmd(vma, address, pmd);
>> - deferred_split_folio(folio, false);
>> - spin_unlock(pmd_ptl);
>> + if (order == HPAGE_PMD_ORDER) {
>> + pgtable = pmd_pgtable(_pmd);
>> + _pmd = mk_huge_pmd(&folio->page, vma->vm_page_prot);
>> + _pmd = maybe_pmd_mkwrite(pmd_mkdirty(_pmd), vma);
>> +
>> + spin_lock(pmd_ptl);
>> + BUG_ON(!pmd_none(*pmd));
>> + folio_add_new_anon_rmap(folio, vma, _address, RMAP_EXCLUSIVE);
>> + folio_add_lru_vma(folio, vma);
>> + pgtable_trans_huge_deposit(mm, pmd, pgtable);
>> + set_pmd_at(mm, address, pmd, _pmd);
>> + update_mmu_cache_pmd(vma, address, pmd);
>> + deferred_split_folio(folio, false);
>> + spin_unlock(pmd_ptl);
>> + } else { //mTHP
>> + mthp_pte = mk_pte(&folio->page, vma->vm_page_prot);
>> + mthp_pte = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(mthp_pte), vma);
>> +
>> + spin_lock(pmd_ptl);
>> + folio_ref_add(folio, (1 << order) - 1);
>> + folio_add_new_anon_rmap(folio, vma, _address, RMAP_EXCLUSIVE);
>> + folio_add_lru_vma(folio, vma);
>> + spin_lock(pte_ptl);
>> + set_ptes(vma->vm_mm, _address, pte, mthp_pte, (1 << order));
>> + update_mmu_cache_range(NULL, vma, _address, pte, (1 << order));
>> + spin_unlock(pte_ptl);
>> + smp_wmb(); /* make pte visible before pmd */
>> + pmd_populate(mm, pmd, pmd_pgtable(_pmd));
>> + deferred_split_folio(folio, false);
>> + spin_unlock(pmd_ptl);
>
> I've only stared at this briefly, but it feels like there might be some bugs:
>
> - Why are you taking the pmd ptl? and calling pmd_populate? Surely the pte
> table already exists and is attached to the pmd? So we are only need to update
> the pte entries here? Or perhaps the whole pmd was previously isolated?
>
> - I think some arches use a single PTL for all levels of the pgtable? So in
> this case it's probably not a good idea to nest the pmd and pte spin lock?
>
> - Given the pte PTL is dropped then reacquired, is there any way that the ptes
> could have changed under us? Is any revalidation required? Perhaps not if pte
> table was removed from the PMD.
>
> - I would have guessed the memory ordering you want from smp_wmb() would
> already be handled by the spin_unlock()?
Not sure if I understand this; in pmd_install(), we take the PMD lock
and before dropping the lock, do smp_wmb(), how is this case different?
>
>
>> + }
>>
>> folio = NULL;
>>
>> @@ -1353,21 +1374,27 @@ static int khugepaged_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> {
>> pmd_t *pmd;
>> pte_t *pte, *_pte;
>> + int i;
>> int result = SCAN_FAIL, referenced = 0;
>> int none_or_zero = 0, shared = 0;
>> struct page *page = NULL;
>> struct folio *folio = NULL;
>> unsigned long _address;
>> + unsigned long enabled_orders;
>> spinlock_t *ptl;
>> int node = NUMA_NO_NODE, unmapped = 0;
>> bool writable = false;
>> -
>> + int chunk_none_count = 0;
>> + int scaled_none = khugepaged_max_ptes_none >> (HPAGE_PMD_ORDER - MIN_MTHP_ORDER);
>> + unsigned long tva_flags = cc->is_khugepaged ? TVA_ENFORCE_SYSFS : 0;
>> VM_BUG_ON(address & ~HPAGE_PMD_MASK);
>>
>> result = find_pmd_or_thp_or_none(mm, address, &pmd);
>> if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
>> goto out;
>>
>> + bitmap_zero(cc->mthp_bitmap, MAX_MTHP_BITMAP_SIZE);
>> + bitmap_zero(cc->mthp_bitmap_temp, MAX_MTHP_BITMAP_SIZE);
>> memset(cc->node_load, 0, sizeof(cc->node_load));
>> nodes_clear(cc->alloc_nmask);
>> pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, address, &ptl);
>> @@ -1376,8 +1403,12 @@ static int khugepaged_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> - for (_address = address, _pte = pte; _pte < pte + HPAGE_PMD_NR;
>> - _pte++, _address += PAGE_SIZE) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < HPAGE_PMD_NR; i++) {
>> + if (i % MIN_MTHP_NR == 0)
>> + chunk_none_count = 0;
>> +
>> + _pte = pte + i;
>> + _address = address + i * PAGE_SIZE;
>> pte_t pteval = ptep_get(_pte);
>> if (is_swap_pte(pteval)) {
>> ++unmapped;
>> @@ -1400,16 +1431,14 @@ static int khugepaged_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> }
>> }
>> if (pte_none(pteval) || is_zero_pfn(pte_pfn(pteval))) {
>> + ++chunk_none_count;
>> ++none_or_zero;
>> - if (!userfaultfd_armed(vma) &&
>> - (!cc->is_khugepaged ||
>> - none_or_zero <= khugepaged_max_ptes_none)) {
>> - continue;
>> - } else {
>> + if (userfaultfd_armed(vma)) {
>> result = SCAN_EXCEED_NONE_PTE;
>> count_vm_event(THP_SCAN_EXCEED_NONE_PTE);
>> goto out_unmap;
>> }
>> + continue;
>> }
>> if (pte_uffd_wp(pteval)) {
>> /*
>> @@ -1500,7 +1529,16 @@ static int khugepaged_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> folio_test_referenced(folio) || mmu_notifier_test_young(vma->vm_mm,
>> address)))
>> referenced++;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * we are reading in MIN_MTHP_NR page chunks. if there are no empty
>> + * pages keep track of it in the bitmap for mTHP collapsing.
>> + */
>> + if (chunk_none_count < scaled_none &&
>> + (i + 1) % MIN_MTHP_NR == 0)
>> + bitmap_set(cc->mthp_bitmap, i / MIN_MTHP_NR, 1);
>> }
>> +
>> if (!writable) {
>> result = SCAN_PAGE_RO;
>> } else if (cc->is_khugepaged &&
>> @@ -1513,10 +1551,14 @@ static int khugepaged_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> out_unmap:
>> pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl);
>> if (result == SCAN_SUCCEED) {
>> - result = collapse_huge_page(mm, address, referenced,
>> - unmapped, cc, mmap_locked, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER, 0);
>> - /* collapse_huge_page will return with the mmap_lock released */
>> - *mmap_locked = false;
>> + enabled_orders = thp_vma_allowable_orders(vma, vma->vm_flags,
>> + tva_flags, THP_ORDERS_ALL_ANON);
>> + result = khugepaged_scan_bitmap(mm, address, referenced, unmapped, cc,
>> + mmap_locked, enabled_orders);
>> + if (result > 0)
>> + result = SCAN_SUCCEED;
>> + else
>> + result = SCAN_FAIL;
>> }
>> out:
>> trace_mm_khugepaged_scan_pmd(mm, &folio->page, writable, referenced,
>> @@ -2476,11 +2518,13 @@ static int khugepaged_collapse_single_pmd(unsigned long addr, struct mm_struct *
>> fput(file);
>> if (result == SCAN_PTE_MAPPED_HUGEPAGE) {
>> mmap_read_lock(mm);
>> + *mmap_locked = true;
>> if (khugepaged_test_exit_or_disable(mm))
>> goto end;
>> result = collapse_pte_mapped_thp(mm, addr,
>> !cc->is_khugepaged);
>> mmap_read_unlock(mm);
>> + *mmap_locked = false;
>> }
>> } else {
>> result = khugepaged_scan_pmd(mm, vma, addr,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-05 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-11 0:30 [RFC v2 0/9] khugepaged: " Nico Pache
2025-02-11 0:30 ` [RFC v2 1/9] introduce khugepaged_collapse_single_pmd to unify khugepaged and madvise_collapse Nico Pache
2025-02-17 17:11 ` Usama Arif
2025-02-17 19:56 ` Nico Pache
2025-02-18 16:26 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-18 22:24 ` Nico Pache
2025-02-11 0:30 ` [RFC v2 2/9] khugepaged: rename hpage_collapse_* to khugepaged_* Nico Pache
2025-02-18 16:29 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-11 0:30 ` [RFC v2 3/9] khugepaged: generalize hugepage_vma_revalidate for mTHP support Nico Pache
2025-02-11 0:30 ` [RFC v2 4/9] khugepaged: generalize alloc_charge_folio " Nico Pache
2025-02-19 15:29 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-11 0:30 ` [RFC v2 5/9] khugepaged: generalize __collapse_huge_page_* " Nico Pache
2025-02-19 15:39 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-19 16:02 ` Nico Pache
2025-02-11 0:30 ` [RFC v2 6/9] khugepaged: introduce khugepaged_scan_bitmap " Nico Pache
2025-02-17 7:27 ` Dev Jain
2025-02-17 19:12 ` Usama Arif
2025-02-19 16:28 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-20 18:48 ` Nico Pache
2025-02-11 0:30 ` [RFC v2 7/9] khugepaged: add " Nico Pache
2025-02-12 17:04 ` Usama Arif
2025-02-12 18:16 ` Nico Pache
2025-02-17 20:55 ` Usama Arif
2025-02-17 21:22 ` Nico Pache
2025-02-18 4:22 ` Dev Jain
2025-03-03 19:18 ` Nico Pache
2025-03-04 5:10 ` Dev Jain
2025-02-19 16:52 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-03-03 19:13 ` Nico Pache
2025-03-05 9:11 ` Dev Jain
2025-03-05 9:07 ` Dev Jain [this message]
2025-03-07 6:38 ` Dev Jain
2025-03-07 20:14 ` Nico Pache
2025-03-10 4:17 ` Dev Jain
2025-02-11 0:30 ` [RFC v2 8/9] khugepaged: improve tracepoints for mTHP orders Nico Pache
2025-02-11 0:30 ` [RFC v2 9/9] khugepaged: skip collapsing mTHP to smaller orders Nico Pache
2025-02-19 16:57 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-11 12:49 ` [RFC v2 0/9] khugepaged: mTHP support Dev Jain
2025-02-12 16:49 ` Nico Pache
2025-02-13 8:26 ` Dev Jain
2025-02-13 11:21 ` Dev Jain
2025-02-13 19:39 ` Nico Pache
2025-02-14 2:01 ` Dev Jain
2025-02-15 0:52 ` Nico Pache
2025-02-15 6:38 ` Dev Jain
2025-02-17 8:05 ` Dev Jain
2025-02-17 19:19 ` Nico Pache
2025-02-17 6:39 ` Dev Jain
2025-02-17 19:15 ` Nico Pache
2025-02-18 16:07 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-18 22:30 ` Nico Pache
2025-02-19 9:01 ` Dev Jain
2025-02-20 19:12 ` Nico Pache
2025-02-21 4:57 ` Dev Jain
2025-02-19 17:00 ` Ryan Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d6d8cc12-6c08-42b1-9baa-d4981299bf28@arm.com \
--to=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=audra@redhat.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=haowenchao22@gmail.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jglisse@google.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=raquini@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=srivatsa@csail.mit.edu \
--cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=zokeefe@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox