From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 071A6C433EF for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 08:30:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 79C7D8D001C; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 04:30:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 74C978D0009; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 04:30:15 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 5EDE78D001C; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 04:30:15 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0010.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.10]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5D78D0009 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 04:30:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin01.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay12.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10ADB120DFD for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 08:30:15 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79554396390.01.A8D9867 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by imf06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E5E180065 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 08:30:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 25888tkT020221; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 08:30:06 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : date : mime-version : subject : to : cc : references : from : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=k1WUGW+CseZlM/U5ZMobrezW0q2F7JrtYtGLV3YwYwA=; b=sMR4OpwTRdYzinHf0Bw/59hZP2+PbYSYmc+FgORSWuqrsMScOPYXLRYjRwoO3cZIxKrs AlvQhYZMnvdM1wzHyS7LlRZEolm1lfd8Fx4FfxnyBuxq8bxWT7g6SQczNVbifnmHGrYG 4geqQI7PAVtLVwE6FUipl4BmBbUElhcm5CKNf8WYC21VZ/GmsN9LMsAfJhK89TfozcuE FmpAKmWCOkylM4CGZkhG9XK9+TfD0qlNuwcUd8393bRJ7nbKnvXd5Pdyize4lBJbU18i ZS2yZ2z58hlY478htcXFLvjnnh00pjIgKXb4pebcEwrkV1RmjBdL29cOm6yecgURJz/J zg== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3gjr0mrd6u-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 08 Jun 2022 08:30:06 +0000 Received: from m0098399.ppops.net (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 2588H2Lt027133; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 08:30:05 GMT Received: from ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (62.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3gjr0mrd5k-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 08 Jun 2022 08:30:05 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 2588K1MV025197; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 08:30:03 GMT Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.192]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3gfy19cvkh-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 08 Jun 2022 08:30:02 +0000 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 2588TiSP24051968 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 8 Jun 2022 08:29:44 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBCCB5204F; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 08:30:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.43.53.124] (unknown [9.43.53.124]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC71C52052; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 08:29:55 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2022 13:59:54 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/9] mm/demotion: Add support for removing node from demotion memory tiers Content-Language: en-US To: Ying Huang , linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: Wei Xu , Greg Thelen , Yang Shi , Davidlohr Bueso , Tim C Chen , Brice Goglin , Michal Hocko , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Hesham Almatary , Dave Hansen , Jonathan Cameron , Alistair Popple , Dan Williams , Feng Tang , Jagdish Gediya , Baolin Wang , David Rientjes References: <20220603134237.131362-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> <20220603134237.131362-7-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> <81956d2e-0bfe-78ba-5ad0-f6c388c2190e@linux.ibm.com> <06d04b6588b43ca010ec78ce0dee8127193f5562.camel@intel.com> From: Aneesh Kumar K V In-Reply-To: <06d04b6588b43ca010ec78ce0dee8127193f5562.camel@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: 7hKwEvUMAfuKYHmBV0IBsxOrhjtCNuim X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: MY-XTz4ioShJcwhoDoswPNOzgtlkNjsz X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.874,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-06-08_02,2022-06-07_02,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2204290000 definitions=main-2206080035 X-Rspam-User: Authentication-Results: imf06.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=sMR4OpwT; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=ibm.com; spf=pass (imf06.hostedemail.com: domain of aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com designates 148.163.156.1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam10 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 80E5E180065 X-Stat-Signature: yt7x93feo9uuwrpowfnqn6cpb4oyx9nr X-HE-Tag: 1654677012-673038 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 6/8/22 1:53 PM, Ying Huang wrote: > On Wed, 2022-06-08 at 13:50 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K V wrote: >> On 6/8/22 12:29 PM, Ying Huang wrote: >>> On Fri, 2022-06-03 at 19:12 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: >>>> This patch adds the special string "none" as a supported memtier value >>>> that we can use to remove a specific node from being using as demotion target. >>>> >>>> For ex: >>>> :/sys/devices/system/node/node1# cat memtier >>>> 1 >>>> :/sys/devices/system/node/node1# cat ../../memtier/memtier1/nodelist >>>> 1-3 >>>> :/sys/devices/system/node/node1# echo none > memtier >>>> :/sys/devices/system/node/node1# >>>> :/sys/devices/system/node/node1# cat memtier >>>> :/sys/devices/system/node/node1# cat ../../memtier/memtier1/nodelist >>>> 2-3 >>>> :/sys/devices/system/node/node1# >>> >>> Do you have a practical use case for this? What kind of memory node >>> needs to be removed from memory tiers demotion/promotion? >>> >> >> This came up in our internal discussion. It was mentioned that there is >> a need to skip some slow memory nodes from participating in demotion. > > Again, can you provide a practical use case? Why we shouldn't demote > cold pages to these slow memory nodes? How do we use these slow memory > node? These slow memory node is slower than disk? > This was discussed in the context of memory borrowed from remote machine (aka OpenCAPI memory). In such case, we would have a memory only NUMA node which we want to avoid using for demotion. -aneesh