From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
To: Kyeongdon Kim <kyeongdon.kim@lge.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au
Cc: ying.huang@intel.com, vbabka@suse.cz, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
xieyisheng1@huawei.com, luto@kernel.org, shli@fb.com,
mhocko@suse.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com, kemi.wang@intel.com,
rientjes@google.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, bongkyu.kim@lge.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmstats: add counters for the page frag cache
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 11:30:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d6120888-344a-4449-4ca6-ac98508bb3cf@yandex-team.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19156a13-6153-f570-317b-7b80505347e7@lge.com>
On 04.09.2017 04:35, Kyeongdon Kim wrote:
> Thanks for your reply,
> But I couldn't find "NR_FRAGMENT_PAGES" in linux-next.git .. is that vmstat counter? or others?
>
I mean rather than adding bunch vmstat counters for operations it might be
worth to add page counter which will show current amount of these pages.
But this seems too low-level for tracking, common counters for all network
buffers would be more useful but much harder to implement.
As I can see page owner is able to save stacktrace where allocation happened,
this makes debugging mostly trivial without any counters. If it adds too much
overhead - just track random 1% of pages, should be enough for finding leak.
> As you know, page_frag_alloc() directly calls __alloc_pages_nodemask() function,
> so that makes too difficult to see memory usage in real time even though we have "/meminfo or /slabinfo.." information.
> If there was a way already to figure out the memory leakage from page_frag_cache in mainline, I agree your opinion
> but I think we don't have it now.
>
> If those counters too much in my patch,
> I can say two values (pgfrag_alloc and pgfrag_free) are enough to guess what will happen
> and would remove pgfrag_alloc_calls and pgfrag_free_calls.
>
> Thanks,
> Kyeongdon Kim
>
> On 2017-09-01 i??i?? 6:12, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>> IMHO that's too much counters.
>> Per-node NR_FRAGMENT_PAGES should be enough for guessing what's going on.
>> Perf probes provides enough features for furhter debugging.
>>
>> On 01.09.2017 02:37, Kyeongdon Kim wrote:
>> > There was a memory leak problem when we did stressful test
>> > on Android device.
>> > The root cause of this was from page_frag_cache alloc
>> > and it was very hard to find out.
>> >
>> > We add to count the page frag allocation and free with function call.
>> > The gap between pgfrag_alloc and pgfrag_free is good to to calculate
>> > for the amount of page.
>> > The gap between pgfrag_alloc_calls and pgfrag_free_calls is for
>> > sub-indicator.
>> > They can see trends of memory usage during the test.
>> > Without it, it's difficult to check page frag usage so I believe we
>> > should add it.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Kyeongdon Kim <kyeongdon.kim@lge.com>
>> > ---
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-04 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-31 23:37 Kyeongdon Kim
2017-08-31 23:41 ` taskboxtester
2017-08-31 23:41 ` taskboxtester
2017-09-01 9:12 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2017-09-01 9:21 ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-04 1:36 ` Kyeongdon Kim
2017-09-04 1:35 ` Kyeongdon Kim
2017-09-04 8:30 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov [this message]
2017-09-08 7:11 ` Kyeongdon Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d6120888-344a-4449-4ca6-ac98508bb3cf@yandex-team.ru \
--to=khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bongkyu.kim@lge.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=kemi.wang@intel.com \
--cc=kyeongdon.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=shli@fb.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=xieyisheng1@huawei.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox