From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1603CC433EF for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 02:50:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id A1D6B8D0001; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 21:50:27 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 9CB278D0005; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 21:50:27 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 892B78D0001; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 21:50:27 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (relay.a.hostedemail.com [64.99.140.24]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595398D0005 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 21:50:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin04.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F4DF23EA2 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 02:50:27 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79197917694.04.2EB2622 Received: from smtpbgau2.qq.com (smtpbgau2.qq.com [54.206.34.216]) by imf24.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C4E518000B for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 02:50:25 +0000 (UTC) X-QQ-mid: bizesmtp88t1646189413tegkkb68 Received: from [10.4.23.188] (unknown [58.240.82.166]) by bizesmtp.qq.com (ESMTP) with id ; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 10:49:47 +0800 (CST) X-QQ-SSF: 00400000002000C0G000B00A0000000 X-QQ-FEAT: Mzskoac49Oheeyx5Q508Zg0F3QC1WYby73hn9UB8Tagbps0XtxSdmAbQbrlfj PnDD4MVfB5Jgka2EwP1rYXCpeWvr95ue+PWwDSzvnigrso0yIt5RAvigK/AYQaOPYq0cO45 IfHg9a71BiTvzTmmOaZxW57ejJ40ix1u0vzEnPbELiaLUvGGEHFw7szZ9mx2R1IT8S36d1v V0NfBCRgsEHtpdmRcJVGgMXAx9q0GlgUEepso6pailIRh+K4aOGkSLXkei5egDDSOQ1PcsC k4vrUYVf01obzCm4bjWVdfvIy1TpOOs/h9f57sbuI+XPg3c6saYjuQPGl0hTwqD9cpr8Yyt nRgq6tXJobjKb+/v2zEeH0Vr0d1Tg== X-QQ-GoodBg: 2 Message-ID: +046FC7FD6CFD57A5 Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 10:48:06 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] fs/drop_caches: move drop_caches sysctls to its own file To: Luis Chamberlain Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, akpm@linux-foundation.org, keescook@chromium.org, yzaikin@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, nizhen@uniontech.com, zhanglianjie@uniontech.com, nixiaoming@huawei.com References: <20220221061018.10472-1-tangmeng@uniontech.com> From: tangmeng In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520 Feedback-ID: bizesmtp:uniontech.com:qybgforeign:qybgforeign5 X-QQ-Bgrelay: 1 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam09 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8C4E518000B X-Stat-Signature: 1gc5icstr84xefh6osazzdihxao5q41c Authentication-Results: imf24.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (imf24.hostedemail.com: domain of tangmeng@uniontech.com designates 54.206.34.216 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tangmeng@uniontech.com; dmarc=none X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1646189425-642243 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000089, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 2022/2/27 05:02, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > Thanks but please send a v3 including all the other patches as well > and collecting the Reviewed/Acked-bys, etc. This can be sent *after* > your v3 of the optimization work. > I have noticed that there is a conflict between sysctl-next and linux-next. Do I resubmit the patch based on linux-next, or after you deal with the conflict between sysctl-next and linux-next, I resubmit based on sysctl-next？