From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from zps37.corp.google.com (zps37.corp.google.com [172.25.146.37]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id m3TH0Za5008712 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:00:36 +0100 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fgad23.prod.google.com [10.86.55.23]) by zps37.corp.google.com with ESMTP id m3TH0UC1020015 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:00:33 -0700 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so64976fga.33 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:00:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:00:29 -0400 From: "Ross Biro" Subject: Re: Page Faults slower in 2.6.25-rc9 than 2.6.23 In-Reply-To: <48175005.90400@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <661de9470804290752w1dc0cfb3k72e81d828a45765e@mail.gmail.com> <48175005.90400@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Hugh Dickins , linux-mm@kvack.org, lkml , Kamalesh Babulal List-ID: On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Balbir Singh wrote: > Aah.. Yes... but I am definitely interested in figuring out the root cause for > the regression. I can't reproduce the 2.6.23 results. I'm going to run the benchmarks a few more times, but I'm suspecting something changed with the hardware. Ross -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org