From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from zps35.corp.google.com (zps35.corp.google.com [172.25.146.35]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id m3TG5EEE020141 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:05:14 +0100 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fge22.prod.google.com [10.86.5.22]) by zps35.corp.google.com with ESMTP id m3TG5CWX010924 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:05:13 -0700 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 22so61662fge.19 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:05:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:05:12 -0400 From: "Ross Biro" Subject: Re: Page Faults slower in 2.6.25-rc9 than 2.6.23 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <661de9470804290752w1dc0cfb3k72e81d828a45765e@mail.gmail.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Hugh Dickins Cc: Balbir Singh , linux-mm@kvack.org, lkml , Kamalesh Babulal List-ID: On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Hugh Dickins wrote: >> I'm checking 2.6.24 now. A quick run of 2.6.25-rc9 without fake numa >> showed no real change. > 2.6.24 is slower as well. I can't say for sure it's the full 10% without more work than it's worth. But it is definitely significantly slower than 2.6.23. Ross -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org