linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
	"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] block, fs: convert Direct IO to FOLL_PIN
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 11:36:30 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d2b87357-baf9-ef1f-6e6a-18aab8e6d2fd@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220225120522.6qctxigvowpnehxl@quack3.lan>

On 2/25/22 04:05, Jan Kara wrote:
...
>> After quite some time exploring and consulting with people as well, it
>> is clear that this cannot be done in just one patchset. That's because,
>> not only is this large and time-consuming (for example, Chaitanya
>> Kulkarni's first reaction, after looking into the details, was, "convert
>> the remaining filesystems to use iomap, *then* convert to FOLL_PIN..."),
>> but it is also spread across many filesystems.
> 
> With having modified fs/direct-io.c and fs/iomap/direct-io.c which
> filesystems do you know are missing conversion? Or is it that you just want
> to make sure with audit everything is fine? The only fs I could find
> unconverted by your changes is ceph. Am I missing something?
> 
> 								Honza

There are a few more filesystems that call iov_iter_get_pages() or
iov_iter_get_pages_alloc(), plus networking things as well, plus some
others that are hard to categorize, such as vhost. So we have:

* ceph
* rds
* cifs
* p9
* net: __zerocopy_sg_from_iter(), tls_setup_from_iter(),
* crypto: af_alg_make_sg() (maybe N/A)
* vmsplice() (as David Hildenbrand mentioned)
* vhost: vhost_scsi_map_to_sgl()

In addition to that, I was also worried that maybe the
blockdev_direct_IO() or iomap filesystems might be breaking encapsulation
occasionally, by calling put_page() on the direct IO user page buffer.
Perhaps in error paths.

Are you pretty sure that that last concern is not valid? That would be a
welcome bit of news.



thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard
NVIDIA


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-25 23:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-25  8:50 John Hubbard
2022-02-25  8:50 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] mm/gup: introduce pin_user_page() John Hubbard
2022-02-28 13:27   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-02-28 21:14     ` John Hubbard
2022-03-01  8:11       ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-01  8:40         ` John Hubbard
2022-03-01  9:30           ` David Hildenbrand
2022-02-25  8:50 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] block: add dio_w_*() wrappers for pin, unpin user pages John Hubbard
2022-02-25  8:50 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] block, fs: assert that key paths use iovecs, and nothing else John Hubbard
2022-02-25  8:50 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] block, bio, fs: initial pin_user_pages_fast() changes John Hubbard
2022-02-25  8:50 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] NFS: direct-io: convert to FOLL_PIN pages John Hubbard
2022-02-25  8:50 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] fuse: convert direct IO paths to use FOLL_PIN John Hubbard
2022-02-25  8:50 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] block, direct-io: flip the switch: use pin_user_pages_fast() John Hubbard
2022-02-25 12:05 ` [RFC PATCH 0/7] block, fs: convert Direct IO to FOLL_PIN Jan Kara
2022-02-25 16:14   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-02-25 16:40     ` Jan Kara
2022-02-25 19:36   ` John Hubbard [this message]
2022-02-25 22:20     ` John Hubbard
2022-02-25 13:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-02-25 21:10   ` John Hubbard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d2b87357-baf9-ef1f-6e6a-18aab8e6d2fd@nvidia.com \
    --to=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox