From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com
Cc: ziy@nvidia.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
baohua@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] khugepaged: Optimize collapse_pte_mapped_thp() for large folios by PTE batching
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 14:40:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d2aee3d9-d3a9-4c69-ad03-8e5774d12dab@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250618155608.18580-1-dev.jain@arm.com>
On 2025/6/18 23:56, Dev Jain wrote:
> Use PTE batching to optimize collapse_pte_mapped_thp().
>
> On arm64, suppose khugepaged is scanning a pte-mapped 2MB THP for collapse.
> Then, calling ptep_clear() for every pte will cause a TLB flush for every
> contpte block. Instead, clear_full_ptes() does a
> contpte_try_unfold_partial() which will flush the TLB only for the (if any)
> starting and ending contpte block, if they partially overlap with the range
> khugepaged is looking at.
>
> For all arches, there should be a benefit due to batching atomic operations
> on mapcounts due to folio_remove_rmap_ptes().
>
> Note that we do not need to make a change to the check
> "if (folio_page(folio, i) != page)"; if i'th page of the folio is equal
> to the first page of our batch, then i + 1, .... i + nr_batch_ptes - 1
> pages of the folio will be equal to the corresponding pages of our
> batch mapping consecutive pages.
>
> No issues were observed with mm-selftests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
> ---
>
> This is rebased on:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250618102607.10551-1-dev.jain@arm.com/
> If there will be a v2 of either version I'll send them together.
>
> mm/khugepaged.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> index 649ccb2670f8..7d37058eda5b 100644
> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> @@ -1499,15 +1499,16 @@ static int set_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> bool install_pmd)
> {
> + int nr_mapped_ptes = 0, nr_batch_ptes, result = SCAN_FAIL;
> struct mmu_notifier_range range;
> bool notified = false;
> unsigned long haddr = addr & HPAGE_PMD_MASK;
> + unsigned long end = haddr + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE;
> struct vm_area_struct *vma = vma_lookup(mm, haddr);
> struct folio *folio;
> pte_t *start_pte, *pte;
> pmd_t *pmd, pgt_pmd;
> spinlock_t *pml = NULL, *ptl;
> - int nr_ptes = 0, result = SCAN_FAIL;
> int i;
>
> mmap_assert_locked(mm);
> @@ -1620,12 +1621,17 @@ int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> if (unlikely(!pmd_same(pgt_pmd, pmdp_get_lockless(pmd))))
> goto abort;
>
> + i = 0, addr = haddr, pte = start_pte;
> /* step 2: clear page table and adjust rmap */
> - for (i = 0, addr = haddr, pte = start_pte;
> - i < HPAGE_PMD_NR; i++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, pte++) {
> + do {
> + const fpb_t flags = FPB_IGNORE_DIRTY | FPB_IGNORE_SOFT_DIRTY;
> + int max_nr_batch_ptes = (end - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + struct folio *this_folio;
> struct page *page;
> pte_t ptent = ptep_get(pte);
>
> + nr_batch_ptes = 1;
> +
> if (pte_none(ptent))
> continue;
> /*
> @@ -1639,6 +1645,11 @@ int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> goto abort;
> }
> page = vm_normal_page(vma, addr, ptent);
> + this_folio = page_folio(page);
> + if (folio_test_large(this_folio) && max_nr_batch_ptes != 1)
> + nr_batch_ptes = folio_pte_batch(this_folio, addr, pte, ptent,
> + max_nr_batch_ptes, flags, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> +
> if (folio_page(folio, i) != page)
> goto abort;
IMO, 'this_folio' is always equal 'folio', right? Can't we just use 'folio'?
In addition, I think the folio_test_large() and max_nr_batch_ptes checks
are redundant, since the 'folio' must be PMD-sized large folio after
'folio_page(folio, i) != page' check.
So I think we can move the 'nr_batch_ptes' calculation after the
folio_page() check, then shoule be:
nr_batch_ptes = folio_pte_batch(folio, addr, pte, ptent,
max_nr_batch_ptes, flags, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> @@ -1647,18 +1658,19 @@ int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> * TLB flush can be left until pmdp_collapse_flush() does it.
> * PTE dirty? Shmem page is already dirty; file is read-only.
> */
> - ptep_clear(mm, addr, pte);
> - folio_remove_rmap_pte(folio, page, vma);
> - nr_ptes++;
> - }
> + clear_full_ptes(mm, addr, pte, nr_batch_ptes, false);
> + folio_remove_rmap_ptes(folio, page, nr_batch_ptes, vma);
> + nr_mapped_ptes += nr_batch_ptes;
> + } while (i += nr_batch_ptes, addr += nr_batch_ptes * PAGE_SIZE,
> + pte += nr_batch_ptes, i < HPAGE_PMD_NR);
>
> if (!pml)
> spin_unlock(ptl);
>
> /* step 3: set proper refcount and mm_counters. */
> - if (nr_ptes) {
> - folio_ref_sub(folio, nr_ptes);
> - add_mm_counter(mm, mm_counter_file(folio), -nr_ptes);
> + if (nr_mapped_ptes) {
> + folio_ref_sub(folio, nr_mapped_ptes);
> + add_mm_counter(mm, mm_counter_file(folio), -nr_mapped_ptes);
> }
>
> /* step 4: remove empty page table */
> @@ -1691,10 +1703,10 @@ int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> : SCAN_SUCCEED;
> goto drop_folio;
> abort:
> - if (nr_ptes) {
> + if (nr_mapped_ptes) {
> flush_tlb_mm(mm);
> - folio_ref_sub(folio, nr_ptes);
> - add_mm_counter(mm, mm_counter_file(folio), -nr_ptes);
> + folio_ref_sub(folio, nr_mapped_ptes);
> + add_mm_counter(mm, mm_counter_file(folio), -nr_mapped_ptes);
> }
> unlock:
> if (start_pte)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-23 6:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-18 15:56 Dev Jain
2025-06-18 17:50 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-19 3:48 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-19 12:55 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-23 14:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-23 6:40 ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2025-06-23 7:16 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-23 7:21 ` Baolin Wang
2025-06-23 7:25 ` Dev Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d2aee3d9-d3a9-4c69-ad03-8e5774d12dab@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox