From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, david@redhat.com,
anshuman.khandual@arm.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
aneesh.kumar@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xarray: Add a BUG_ON() to ensure caller is not sibling
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 10:11:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d289f57c-55dd-40cc-a4bb-8359ee61e8c9@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250604041533.91198-1-dev.jain@arm.com>
On 04/06/25 9:45 am, Dev Jain wrote:
> Suppose xas is pointing somewhere near the end of the multi-entry batch.
> Then it may happen that the computed slot already falls beyond the batch,
> thus breaking the loop due to !xa_is_sibling(), and computing the wrong
> order. For example, suppose we have a shift-6 node having an order-9
> entry => 8 - 1 = 7 siblings, so assume the slots are at offset 0 till 7 in
> this node. If xas->xa_offset is 6, then the code will compute order as
> 1 + xas->xa_node->shift = 7. Therefore, the order computation must start
> from the beginning of the multi-slot entries, that is, the non-sibling
> entry. Thus ensure that the caller is aware of this by triggering a BUG
> when the entry is a sibling entry. Note that this BUG_ON() is only
> active while running selftests, so there is no overhead in a running
> kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
> ---
Gentle ping, is anything else required from my side.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-10 4:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-04 4:15 Dev Jain
2025-06-04 4:33 ` Andrew Morton
2025-06-04 4:53 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-04 13:40 ` Zi Yan
2025-06-10 4:41 ` Dev Jain [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d289f57c-55dd-40cc-a4bb-8359ee61e8c9@arm.com \
--to=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox