From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
j.granados@samsung.com, lizhijian@fujitsu.com,
muchun.song@linux.dev, nphamcs@gmail.com, rppt@kernel.org,
souravpanda@google.com, vbabka@suse.cz, willy@infradead.org,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, yi.zhang@redhat.com,
alison.schofield@intel.com, david@redhat.com,
yosryahmed@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] mm: don't account memmap per-node
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2024 13:26:17 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d28059a0-25af-6d0c-3f6d-7e7bc208a0da@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240809191020.1142142-4-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
On Fri, 9 Aug 2024, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> Fix invalid access to pgdat during hot-remove operation:
> ndctl users reported a GPF when trying to destroy a namespace:
> $ ndctl destroy-namespace all -r all -f
> Segmentation fault
> dmesg:
> Oops: general protection fault, probably for
> non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000005650: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
> PTI
> KASAN: probably user-memory-access in range
> [0x000000000002b280-0x000000000002b287]
> CPU: 26 UID: 0 PID: 1868 Comm: ndctl Not tainted 6.11.0-rc1 #1
> Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R640/08HT8T, BIOS
> 2.20.1 09/13/2023
> RIP: 0010:mod_node_page_state+0x2a/0x110
>
> cxl-test users report a GPF when trying to unload the test module:
> $ modrpobe -r cxl-test
> dmesg
> BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000000004200
> #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> PGD 0 P4D 0
> Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
> CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1076 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G O N 6.11.0-rc1 #197
> Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [N]=TEST
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/15
> RIP: 0010:mod_node_page_state+0x6/0x90
>
> Currently, when memory is hot-plugged or hot-removed the accounting is
> done based on the assumption that memmap is allocated from the same node
> as the hot-plugged/hot-removed memory, which is not always the case.
>
> In addition, there are challenges with keeping the node id of the memory
> that is being remove to the time when memmap accounting is actually
> performed: since this is done after remove_pfn_range_from_zone(), and
> also after remove_memory_block_devices(). Meaning that we cannot use
> pgdat nor walking though memblocks to get the nid.
>
> Given all of that, account the memmap overhead system wide instead.
>
> For this we are going to be using global atomic counters, but given that
> memmap size is rarely modified, and normally is only modified either
> during early boot when there is only one CPU, or under a hotplug global
> mutex lock, therefore there is no need for per-cpu optimizations.
>
> Also, while we are here rename nr_memmap to nr_memmap_pages, and
> nr_memmap_boot to nr_memmap_boot_pages to be self explanatory that the
> units are in page count.
>
> Reported-by: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/CAHj4cs9Ax1=CoJkgBGP_+sNu6-6=6v=_L-ZBZY0bVLD3wUWZQg@mail.gmail.com
> Reported-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/Zq0tPd2h6alFz8XF@aschofie-mobl2/#t
>
> Fixes: 15995a352474 ("mm: report per-page metadata information")
> Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
> Tested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-11 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-09 19:10 [PATCH v5 0/3] Fixes for memmap accounting Pasha Tatashin
2024-08-09 19:10 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] mm: don't account memmap on failure Pasha Tatashin
2024-08-10 2:39 ` Muchun Song
2024-08-11 20:23 ` David Rientjes
2024-08-09 19:10 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] mm: add system wide stats items category Pasha Tatashin
2024-08-11 20:24 ` David Rientjes
2024-08-09 19:10 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] mm: don't account memmap per-node Pasha Tatashin
2024-08-11 20:26 ` David Rientjes [this message]
2024-08-16 1:24 ` Yi Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d28059a0-25af-6d0c-3f6d-7e7bc208a0da@google.com \
--to=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=j.granados@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizhijian@fujitsu.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=souravpanda@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yi.zhang@redhat.com \
--cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox