linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
To: Peng Zhang <zhangpeng362@huawei.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
	shakeelb@google.com, muchun.song@linux.dev,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
	sunnanyong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/memcg: remove return value of mem_cgroup_scan_tasks()
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 20:47:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d188b6b7-af05-3bd2-c972-87722106180c@wanadoo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230616063030.977586-1-zhangpeng362@huawei.com>

Le 16/06/2023 à 08:30, Peng Zhang a écrit :
> From: ZhangPeng <zhangpeng362@huawei.com>
> 
> No user checks the return value of mem_cgroup_scan_tasks(). Make the
> return value void.
> 
> Signed-off-by: ZhangPeng <zhangpeng362@huawei.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - drop redundant return 0 per kernel test robot
> 
>   include/linux/memcontrol.h | 7 +++----
>   mm/memcontrol.c            | 9 ++++-----
>   2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index c3d3a0c09315..5818af8eca5a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -820,8 +820,8 @@ struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_iter(struct mem_cgroup *,
>   				   struct mem_cgroup *,
>   				   struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_cookie *);
>   void mem_cgroup_iter_break(struct mem_cgroup *, struct mem_cgroup *);
> -int mem_cgroup_scan_tasks(struct mem_cgroup *,
> -			  int (*)(struct task_struct *, void *), void *);
> +void mem_cgroup_scan_tasks(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> +			   int (*)(struct task_struct *, void *), void *arg);
>   
>   static inline unsigned short mem_cgroup_id(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>   {
> @@ -1364,10 +1364,9 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_iter_break(struct mem_cgroup *root,
>   {
>   }
>   
> -static inline int mem_cgroup_scan_tasks(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> +static inline void mem_cgroup_scan_tasks(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>   		int (*fn)(struct task_struct *, void *), void *arg)
>   {
> -	return 0;
>   }
>   
>   static inline unsigned short mem_cgroup_id(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index cf06b1c9b3bb..a834b1edcde9 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -1259,13 +1259,13 @@ static void invalidate_reclaim_iterators(struct mem_cgroup *dead_memcg)
>    *
>    * This function iterates over tasks attached to @memcg or to any of its
>    * descendants and calls @fn for each task. If @fn returns a non-zero
> - * value, the function breaks the iteration loop and returns the value.
> - * Otherwise, it will iterate over all tasks and return 0.
> + * value, the function breaks the iteration loop. Otherwise, it will iterate
> + * over all tasks and return 0.

It does not return 0 any more in such a case.

CJ

>    *
>    * This function must not be called for the root memory cgroup.
>    */
> -int mem_cgroup_scan_tasks(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> -			  int (*fn)(struct task_struct *, void *), void *arg)
> +void mem_cgroup_scan_tasks(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> +			   int (*fn)(struct task_struct *, void *), void *arg)
>   {
>   	struct mem_cgroup *iter;
>   	int ret = 0;
> @@ -1285,7 +1285,6 @@ int mem_cgroup_scan_tasks(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>   			break;
>   		}
>   	}
> -	return ret;
>   }
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM



      reply	other threads:[~2023-06-16 18:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-16  6:30 Peng Zhang
2023-06-16 18:47 ` Christophe JAILLET [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d188b6b7-af05-3bd2-c972-87722106180c@wanadoo.fr \
    --to=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhangpeng362@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox