linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
	Dmitriy Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Michael Davidson <md@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/boot/64/clang: Use fixup_pointer() to access '__supported_pte_mask'
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 09:25:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d149aae8-6aba-bb31-ddd6-49244598a617@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG_fn=Xv74c80swzFjKyybQpRj7Qj9K1NVH-D6gcxcYEoUJ1xA@mail.gmail.com>

On 05/08/2018 07:50 AM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
>>> Similarly to commit 187e91fe5e91
>>> ("x86/boot/64/clang: Use fixup_pointer() to access 'next_early_pgt'"),
>>> '__supported_pte_mask' must be also accessed using fixup_pointer() to
>>> avoid position-dependent relocations.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
>>> Fixes: fb43d6cb91ef ("x86/mm: Do not auto-massage page protections")
> 
>> In the interests of standalone changelogs, I'd really appreciate an
>> actual explanation of what's going on here.  Your patch makes the code
>> uglier and doesn't fix anything functional from what I can see.
> You're right, sure. I'll send a patch with an updated description.

Great, thanks!

>> Do we have anything we can do to keep us from recreating these kinds of
>> regressions all the time?
> I'm not really aware of the possible options in the kernel land. Looks like
> a task for some objtool-like utility?
> As long as these regressions are caught with Clang, setting up a 0day Clang
> builder might help.

I've asked the 0day folks if this is doable.  It would be great to see
it added.

      reply	other threads:[~2018-05-08 16:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-08 12:16 Alexander Potapenko
2018-05-08 14:30 ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-08 14:50   ` Alexander Potapenko
2018-05-08 16:25     ` Dave Hansen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d149aae8-6aba-bb31-ddd6-49244598a617@intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=md@google.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mka@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox