From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>, Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-openrisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] mm/pagewalk: split walk_page_range_novma() into kernel/user parts
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 10:09:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d0df9d25-f6c7-46ce-9808-cc92855d6e9d@lucifer.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aD_-qdg2OvKQIyRg@kernel.org>
On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 11:07:05AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 09:39:30AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > On 03.06.25 21:22, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> > > The walk_page_range_novma() function is rather confusing - it supports two
> > > modes, one used often, the other used only for debugging.
> > >
> > > The first mode is the common case of traversal of kernel page tables, which
> > > is what nearly all callers use this for.
> >
> > ... and what people should be using it for 🙂
> >
> > >
> > > Secondly it provides an unusual debugging interface that allows for the
> > > traversal of page tables in a userland range of memory even for that memory
> > > which is not described by a VMA.
> > >
> > > This is highly unusual and it is far from certain that such page tables
> > > should even exist, but perhaps this is precisely why it is useful as a
> > > debugging mechanism.
> > >
> > > As a result, this is utilised by ptdump only. Historically, things were
> > > reversed - ptdump was the only user, and other parts of the kernel evolved
> > > to use the kernel page table walking here.
> > >
> > > Since we have some complicated and confusing locking rules for the novma
> > > case, it makes sense to separate the two usages into their own functions.
> > >
> > > Doing this also provide self-documentation as to the intent of the caller -
> > > are they doing something rather unusual or are they simply doing a standard
> > > kernel page table walk?
> > >
> > > We therefore maintain walk_page_range_novma() for this single usage, and
> > > document the function as such.
> >
> > If we have to keep this dangerous interface, it should probably be
> >
> > walk_page_range_debug() or walk_page_range_dump()
>
> We can also move it from include/linux/pagewalk.h to mm/internal.h
Yeah I was wondering about a rename actually, but then thought 'oh novma kinda
fits blah blah' but you're right, this is better.
Nice idea to move to mm/internal.h also :) I like this...
Will fixup on respin
>
> > >
> > > Note that ptdump uses the precise same function for kernel walking as a
> > > convenience, so we permit this but make it very explicit by having
> > > walk_page_range_novma() invoke walk_page_range_kernel() in this case.
> > >
> > > We introduce walk_page_range_kernel() for the far more common case of
> > > kernel page table traversal.
> >
> > I wonder if we should give it a completely different name scheme to
> > highlight that this is something completely different.
> >
> > walk_kernel_page_table_range()
> >
> > etc.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> >
> > David / dhildenb
> >
>
> --
> Sincerely yours,
> Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-04 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-03 19:22 Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-04 7:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-04 8:07 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-06-04 8:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-04 9:09 ` Lorenzo Stoakes [this message]
2025-06-04 12:26 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-06-04 12:31 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-04 9:20 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d0df9d25-f6c7-46ce-9808-cc92855d6e9d@lucifer.local \
--to=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jonas@southpole.se \
--cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-openrisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shorne@gmail.com \
--cc=stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox