From: Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 06/19] slab: introduce percpu sheaves bootstrap
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 20:17:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ct5pjdx3k4sxw5qjuzs7rsblkxpkah3qdx6kbhe2oeuaontaii@fwgb6ovi36zj> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251023-sheaves-for-all-v1-6-6ffa2c9941c0@suse.cz>
On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 03:52:28PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Until now, kmem_cache->cpu_sheaves was !NULL only for caches with
> sheaves enabled. Since we want to enable them for almost all caches,
> it's suboptimal to test the pointer in the fast paths, so instead
> allocate it for all caches in do_kmem_cache_create(). Instead of testing
> the cpu_sheaves pointer to recognize caches (yet) without sheaves, test
> kmem_cache->sheaf_capacity for being 0, where needed.
>
> However, for the fast paths sake we also assume that the main sheaf
> always exists (pcs->main is !NULL), and during bootstrap we cannot
> allocate sheaves yet.
>
> Solve this by introducing a single static bootstrap_sheaf that's
> assigned as pcs->main during bootstrap. It has a size of 0, so during
> allocations, the fast path will find it's empty. Since the size of 0
> matches sheaf_capacity of 0, the freeing fast paths will find it's
> "full". In the slow path handlers, we check sheaf_capacity to recognize
> that the cache doesn't (yet) have real sheaves, and fall back. Thus
> sharing the single bootstrap sheaf like this for multiple caches and
> cpus is safe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> ---
> mm/slub.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index a6e58d3708f4..ecb10ed5acfe 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -2850,6 +2850,10 @@ static void pcs_destroy(struct kmem_cache *s)
> if (!pcs->main)
> continue;
>
> + /* bootstrap or debug caches, it's the bootstrap_sheaf */
> + if (!pcs->main->cache)
> + continue;
> +
> /*
> * We have already passed __kmem_cache_shutdown() so everything
> * was flushed and there should be no objects allocated from
> @@ -4054,7 +4058,7 @@ static void flush_cpu_slab(struct work_struct *w)
>
> s = sfw->s;
>
> - if (s->cpu_sheaves)
> + if (s->sheaf_capacity)
> pcs_flush_all(s);
>
> flush_this_cpu_slab(s);
> @@ -4176,7 +4180,7 @@ static int slub_cpu_dead(unsigned int cpu)
> mutex_lock(&slab_mutex);
> list_for_each_entry(s, &slab_caches, list) {
> __flush_cpu_slab(s, cpu);
> - if (s->cpu_sheaves)
> + if (s->sheaf_capacity)
> __pcs_flush_all_cpu(s, cpu);
> }
> mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex);
> @@ -4979,6 +4983,12 @@ __pcs_replace_empty_main(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slub_percpu_sheaves *pcs,
>
> lockdep_assert_held(this_cpu_ptr(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock));
>
> + /* Bootstrap or debug cache, back off */
> + if (unlikely(!s->sheaf_capacity)) {
> + local_unlock(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> if (pcs->spare && pcs->spare->size > 0) {
> swap(pcs->main, pcs->spare);
> return pcs;
> @@ -5162,6 +5172,11 @@ unsigned int alloc_from_pcs_bulk(struct kmem_cache *s, size_t size, void **p)
> struct slab_sheaf *full;
> struct node_barn *barn;
>
> + if (unlikely(!s->sheaf_capacity)) {
> + local_unlock(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock);
> + return allocated;
> + }
> +
> if (pcs->spare && pcs->spare->size > 0) {
> swap(pcs->main, pcs->spare);
> goto do_alloc;
> @@ -5241,8 +5256,7 @@ static __fastpath_inline void *slab_alloc_node(struct kmem_cache *s, struct list
> if (unlikely(object))
> goto out;
>
> - if (s->cpu_sheaves)
> - object = alloc_from_pcs(s, gfpflags, node);
> + object = alloc_from_pcs(s, gfpflags, node);
>
> if (!object)
> object = __slab_alloc_node(s, gfpflags, node, addr, orig_size);
> @@ -6042,6 +6056,12 @@ __pcs_replace_full_main(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slub_percpu_sheaves *pcs)
> restart:
> lockdep_assert_held(this_cpu_ptr(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock));
>
> + /* Bootstrap or debug cache, back off */
> + if (unlikely(!s->sheaf_capacity)) {
> + local_unlock(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> barn = get_barn(s);
> if (!barn) {
> local_unlock(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock);
> @@ -6240,6 +6260,12 @@ bool __kfree_rcu_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, void *obj)
> struct slab_sheaf *empty;
> struct node_barn *barn;
>
> + /* Bootstrap or debug cache, fall back */
> + if (!unlikely(s->sheaf_capacity)) {
> + local_unlock(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock);
> + goto fail;
> + }
> +
> if (pcs->spare && pcs->spare->size == 0) {
> pcs->rcu_free = pcs->spare;
> pcs->spare = NULL;
> @@ -6364,6 +6390,9 @@ static void free_to_pcs_bulk(struct kmem_cache *s, size_t size, void **p)
> if (likely(pcs->main->size < s->sheaf_capacity))
> goto do_free;
>
> + if (unlikely(!s->sheaf_capacity))
> + goto no_empty;
> +
> barn = get_barn(s);
> if (!barn)
> goto no_empty;
> @@ -6628,9 +6657,8 @@ void slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab, void *object,
> if (unlikely(!slab_free_hook(s, object, slab_want_init_on_free(s), false)))
> return;
>
> - if (s->cpu_sheaves && likely(!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) ||
> - slab_nid(slab) == numa_mem_id())
> - && likely(!slab_test_pfmemalloc(slab))) {
> + if (likely(!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) || slab_nid(slab) == numa_mem_id())
> + && likely(!slab_test_pfmemalloc(slab))) {
> if (likely(free_to_pcs(s, object)))
> return;
> }
> @@ -7437,8 +7465,7 @@ int kmem_cache_alloc_bulk_noprof(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, size_t size,
> size--;
> }
>
> - if (s->cpu_sheaves)
> - i = alloc_from_pcs_bulk(s, size, p);
> + i = alloc_from_pcs_bulk(s, size, p);
>
> if (i < size) {
> /*
> @@ -7649,6 +7676,7 @@ static inline int alloc_kmem_cache_cpus(struct kmem_cache *s)
>
> static int init_percpu_sheaves(struct kmem_cache *s)
> {
> + static struct slab_sheaf bootstrap_sheaf = {};
> int cpu;
>
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> @@ -7658,7 +7686,28 @@ static int init_percpu_sheaves(struct kmem_cache *s)
>
> local_trylock_init(&pcs->lock);
>
> - pcs->main = alloc_empty_sheaf(s, GFP_KERNEL);
> + /*
> + * Bootstrap sheaf has zero size so fast-path allocation fails.
> + * It has also size == s->sheaf_capacity, so fast-path free
> + * fails. In the slow paths we recognize the situation by
> + * checking s->sheaf_capacity. This allows fast paths to assume
> + * s->pcs_sheaves and pcs->main always exists and is valid.
> + * It's also safe to share the single static bootstrap_sheaf
> + * with zero-sized objects array as it's never modified.
> + *
> + * bootstrap_sheaf also has NULL pointer to kmem_cache so we
> + * recognize it and not attempt to free it when destroying the
> + * cache
> + *
> + * We keep bootstrap_sheaf for kmem_cache and kmem_cache_node,
> + * caches with debug enabled, and all caches with SLUB_TINY.
> + * For kmalloc caches it's used temporarily during the initial
> + * bootstrap.
> + */
> + if (!s->sheaf_capacity)
> + pcs->main = &bootstrap_sheaf;
> + else
> + pcs->main = alloc_empty_sheaf(s, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> if (!pcs->main)
> return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -7733,8 +7782,7 @@ static void free_kmem_cache_nodes(struct kmem_cache *s)
> void __kmem_cache_release(struct kmem_cache *s)
> {
> cache_random_seq_destroy(s);
> - if (s->cpu_sheaves)
> - pcs_destroy(s);
> + pcs_destroy(s);
> #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> if (s->cpu_slab)
> lockdep_unregister_key(&s->lock_key);
> @@ -7756,7 +7804,7 @@ static int init_kmem_cache_nodes(struct kmem_cache *s)
> continue;
> }
>
> - if (s->cpu_sheaves) {
> + if (s->sheaf_capacity) {
> barn = kmalloc_node(sizeof(*barn), GFP_KERNEL, node);
>
> if (!barn)
> @@ -8074,7 +8122,7 @@ int __kmem_cache_shutdown(struct kmem_cache *s)
> flush_all_cpus_locked(s);
>
> /* we might have rcu sheaves in flight */
> - if (s->cpu_sheaves)
> + if (s->sheaf_capacity)
> rcu_barrier();
>
> /* Attempt to free all objects */
> @@ -8375,7 +8423,7 @@ static int slab_mem_going_online_callback(int nid)
> if (get_node(s, nid))
> continue;
>
> - if (s->cpu_sheaves) {
> + if (s->sheaf_capacity) {
> barn = kmalloc_node(sizeof(*barn), GFP_KERNEL, nid);
>
> if (!barn) {
> @@ -8608,12 +8656,10 @@ int do_kmem_cache_create(struct kmem_cache *s, const char *name,
>
> set_cpu_partial(s);
>
> - if (s->sheaf_capacity) {
> - s->cpu_sheaves = alloc_percpu(struct slub_percpu_sheaves);
> - if (!s->cpu_sheaves) {
> - err = -ENOMEM;
> - goto out;
> - }
> + s->cpu_sheaves = alloc_percpu(struct slub_percpu_sheaves);
After this change, all SLUB caches enable cpu_sheaves; therefore,
slab_unmergeable() will always return 1.
int slab_unmergeable(struct kmem_cache *s)
{
...
if (s->cpu_sheaves)
return 1;
...
}
Maybe we need to update slab_unmergeable() accordingly..
> + if (!s->cpu_sheaves) {
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> @@ -8632,11 +8678,9 @@ int do_kmem_cache_create(struct kmem_cache *s, const char *name,
> if (!alloc_kmem_cache_cpus(s))
> goto out;
>
> - if (s->cpu_sheaves) {
> - err = init_percpu_sheaves(s);
> - if (err)
> - goto out;
> - }
> + err = init_percpu_sheaves(s);
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
>
> err = 0;
>
>
> --
> 2.51.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-15 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-23 13:52 [PATCH RFC 00/19] slab: replace cpu (partial) slabs with sheaves Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-23 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC 01/19] slab: move kfence_alloc() out of internal bulk alloc Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-23 15:20 ` Marco Elver
2025-10-29 14:38 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-29 15:30 ` Marco Elver
2025-10-23 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC 02/19] slab: handle pfmemalloc slabs properly with sheaves Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-24 14:21 ` Chris Mason
2025-10-29 15:00 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-29 16:06 ` Chris Mason
2025-10-23 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC 03/19] slub: remove CONFIG_SLUB_TINY specific code paths Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-24 22:34 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-29 15:37 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-23 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC 04/19] slab: prevent recursive kmalloc() in alloc_empty_sheaf() Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-23 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC 05/19] slab: add sheaves to most caches Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-27 0:24 ` Harry Yoo
2025-10-29 15:42 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-23 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC 06/19] slab: introduce percpu sheaves bootstrap Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-24 15:29 ` Chris Mason
2025-10-29 15:51 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-12-15 12:17 ` Hao Li [this message]
2025-12-15 15:20 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-23 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC 07/19] slab: make percpu sheaves compatible with kmalloc_nolock()/kfree_nolock() Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-24 14:04 ` Chris Mason
2025-10-29 17:30 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-24 19:43 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-29 17:46 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-23 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC 08/19] slab: handle kmalloc sheaves bootstrap Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-27 6:12 ` Harry Yoo
2025-10-29 20:06 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-29 20:06 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-30 0:11 ` Harry Yoo
2025-10-23 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC 09/19] slab: add optimized sheaf refill from partial list Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-27 7:20 ` Harry Yoo
2025-10-27 9:11 ` Harry Yoo
2025-10-29 20:48 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-30 0:07 ` Harry Yoo
2025-10-30 13:18 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-23 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC 10/19] slab: remove cpu (partial) slabs usage from allocation paths Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-24 14:29 ` Chris Mason
2025-10-29 21:31 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-30 4:32 ` Harry Yoo
2025-10-30 13:09 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-30 15:27 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-30 15:35 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-30 15:59 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-11-03 3:44 ` Harry Yoo
2025-10-23 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC 11/19] slab: remove SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-24 20:43 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-29 22:31 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-30 0:26 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-23 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC 12/19] slab: remove the do_slab_free() fastpath Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-24 22:32 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-29 22:44 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-30 0:24 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-23 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC 13/19] slab: remove defer_deactivate_slab() Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-23 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC 14/19] slab: simplify kmalloc_nolock() Vlastimil Babka
2025-12-16 2:35 ` Hao Li
2025-10-23 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC 15/19] slab: remove struct kmem_cache_cpu Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-23 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC 16/19] slab: remove unused PREEMPT_RT specific macros Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-23 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC 17/19] slab: refill sheaves from all nodes Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-23 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC 18/19] slab: update overview comments Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-23 13:52 ` [PATCH RFC 19/19] slab: remove frozen slab checks from __slab_free() Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-24 23:57 ` [PATCH RFC 00/19] slab: replace cpu (partial) slabs with sheaves Alexei Starovoitov
2025-11-04 22:11 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ct5pjdx3k4sxw5qjuzs7rsblkxpkah3qdx6kbhe2oeuaontaii@fwgb6ovi36zj \
--to=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox