From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, hughd@google.com
Cc: willy@infradead.org, david@redhat.com,
wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, 21cnbao@gmail.com,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, ioworker0@gmail.com, da.gomez@samsung.com,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] Support large folios for tmpfs
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 17:58:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1728548374.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
Hi,
This RFC patch series attempts to support large folios for tmpfs.
Considering that tmpfs already has the 'huge=' option to control the THP
allocation, it is necessary to maintain compatibility with the 'huge='
option, as well as considering the 'deny' and 'force' option controlled
by '/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/shmem_enabled'.
Add a new huge option 'write_size' to support large folio allocation based
on the write size for tmpfs write and fallocate paths. So the huge pages
allocation strategy for tmpfs is that, if the 'huge=' option
(huge=always/within_size/advise) is enabled or the 'shmem_enabled' option
is 'force', it need just allow PMD sized THP to keep backward compatibility
for tmpfs. While 'huge=' option is disabled (huge=never) or the 'shmem_enabled'
option is 'deny', it will still disable any large folio allocations. Only
when the 'huge=' option is 'write_size', it will allow allocating large
folios based on the write size.
And I think the 'huge=write_size' option should be the default behavior
for tmpfs in future.
Any comments and suggestions are appreciated. Thanks.
Changes from RFC v2:
- Drop mTHP interfaces to control huge page allocation, per Matthew.
- Add a new helper to calculate the order, suggested by Matthew.
- Add a new huge=write_size option to allocate large folios based on
the write size.
- Add a new patch to update the documentation.
Changes from RFC v1:
- Drop patch 1.
- Use 'write_end' to calculate the length in shmem_allowable_huge_orders().
- Update shmem_mapping_size_order() per Daniel.
Baolin Wang (4):
mm: factor out the order calculation into a new helper
mm: shmem: change shmem_huge_global_enabled() to return huge order
bitmap
mm: shmem: add large folio support to the write and fallocate paths
for tmpfs
docs: tmpfs: add documention for 'write_size' huge option
Documentation/filesystems/tmpfs.rst | 7 +-
include/linux/pagemap.h | 16 ++++-
mm/shmem.c | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
3 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
--
2.39.3
next reply other threads:[~2024-10-10 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-10 9:58 Baolin Wang [this message]
2024-10-10 9:58 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] mm: factor out the order calculation into a new helper Baolin Wang
2024-10-10 9:58 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] mm: shmem: change shmem_huge_global_enabled() to return huge order bitmap Baolin Wang
2024-10-10 9:58 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/4] mm: shmem: add large folio support to the write and fallocate paths for tmpfs Baolin Wang
2024-10-10 9:58 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/4] docs: tmpfs: add documention for 'write_size' huge option Baolin Wang
2024-10-16 7:49 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] Support large folios for tmpfs Kefeng Wang
2024-10-16 9:29 ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-16 13:45 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-10-17 9:52 ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-16 14:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-10-17 9:34 ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-17 11:26 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-10-21 6:24 ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-21 8:54 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-10-21 13:34 ` Daniel Gomez
2024-10-22 3:41 ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-22 15:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-23 8:04 ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-23 9:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-24 10:49 ` Daniel Gomez
2024-10-24 10:52 ` Daniel Gomez
2024-10-25 2:56 ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-25 20:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-28 9:48 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-31 3:43 ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-31 8:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-31 10:04 ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-31 10:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-31 10:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-05 12:45 ` Baolin Wang
2024-11-05 14:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-06 3:17 ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-28 21:56 ` Daniel Gomez
2024-10-29 12:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-22 3:34 ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-22 10:06 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-10-23 9:25 ` Baolin Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1728548374.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=da.gomez@samsung.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox