[外部邮件] 此邮件来源于小米公司外部，请谨慎处理。若对邮件安全性存疑，请将邮件转发给misec@xiaomi.com进行反馈

Hi

On 4/16/26 8:12 AM, Xiang Gao wrote:
> From: Xiang Gao <gaoxiang17@xiaomi.com>
>
> Fix three typos in comments:
>
> - Line 112: "zome_reclaim_mode" -> "zone_reclaim_mode"
> - Line 6208: "prioities" -> "priorities"
> - Line 7067: "that that high" -> "that the high" (duplicated word)
>
> Signed-off-by: gaoxiang17 <gaoxiang17@xiaomi.com>


I am seeing below issue with checkpatch.pl

./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict 0001-mm-vmscan-fix-typos-in-comments.patch
WARNING: From:/Signed-off-by: email name mismatch: 'From: Xiang Gao
<gaoxiang17@xiaomi.com>' != 'Signed-off-by: gaoxiang17
<gaoxiang17@xiaomi.com>'

total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 24 lines checked

> ---
>   mm/vmscan.c | 6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 0fc9373e8251..710fbe1ee151 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ struct scan_control {
>       /* zone_reclaim_mode */
>       unsigned int may_unmap:1;
>
> -     /* zome_reclaim_mode, boost reclaim, cgroup restrictions */
> +     /* zone_reclaim_mode, boost reclaim, cgroup restrictions */
>       unsigned int may_swap:1;
>
>       /* Not allow cache_trim_mode to be turned on as part of reclaim? */
> @@ -6205,7 +6205,7 @@ static void consider_reclaim_throttle(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
>       if (current_is_kswapd() || cgroup_reclaim(sc))
>               return;
>
> -     /* Throttle if making no progress at high prioities. */
> +     /* Throttle if making no progress at high priorities. */
>       if (sc->priority == 1 && !sc->nr_reclaimed)
>               reclaim_throttle(pgdat, VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS);
>   }
> @@ -7064,7 +7064,7 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int highest_zoneidx)
>
>               /*
>                * There should be no need to raise the scanning priority if
> -              * enough pages are already being scanned that that high
> +              * enough pages are already being scanned that the high
>                * watermark would be met at 100% efficiency.
>                */
>               if (kswapd_shrink_node(pgdat, &sc))