linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
To: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	Nanyong Sun <sunnanyong@huawei.com>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: khugepaged: fix call hpage_collapse_scan_file() for anonymous vma
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2025 11:54:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cdea5568-a409-0c58-a8b6-1b2875d030e5@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58595f1f-7959-4dc1-9ea2-470c44709d31@os.amperecomputing.com>



On 2025/1/11 3:40, Yang Shi wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/10/25 11:01 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 10:04:42AM -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
>>> On 1/9/25 8:31 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 09:00:24AM -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
>>>>> Thanks for catching this. It sounds a little bit weird to have vm_file for
>>>>> an anonymous VMA. I'm not sure why we should keep such special case. It
>>>>> seems shared mapping is treated as shmem file mapping. So can we set vm_file
>>>>> to NULL when mmap'ing /dev/zero for private mapping? Something like:
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/char/mem.c b/drivers/char/mem.c
>>>>> index 169eed162a7f..fc332efc5c11 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/char/mem.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/char/mem.c
>>>>> @@ -527,6 +527,7 @@ static int mmap_zero(struct file *file, struct
>>>>> vm_area_struct *vma)
>>>>>           if (vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)
>>>>>                   return shmem_zero_setup(vma);
>>>>>           vma_set_anonymous(vma);
>>>>> +       vma->vm_file = NULL;
>>>>>           return 0;
>>>>>    }
>>>> I'm wary this might cause other bugs somewhere.  rc6 is a bit late to be
>>>> introducing such a subtle change.
>>> Thanks for the extra caution. Applying the proposed fix in khugepaged code
>>> is fine to me either. We can try to kill the special case later.
>>>
>>> Looking at the code further, I think we should do more to make private
>>> /dev/zero mapping an anonymous mapping:
>> I'm still nervous about this.  We map device inodes in a lot of places.
>
> Yes, we do. But I don't think this change actually changes the semantic of /dev/zero. Shared /dev/zero mapping is still treated as shmem mapping, private /dev/zero mapping is treated as anonymous mapping, but the current implementation is actually half-baked. It has NULL vma->vm_ops which is used to tell kernel whether it is an anonymous vma or not, but it also has valid vma->vm_file and vma->vm_pgoff as in file offset.
>
> So this special case makes kernel has 3 types of VMA:
>     - anonymous VMA: vm_ops is NULL, vm_file is NULL, vm_pgoff is the linear address pgoff
>     - file VMA: vm_ops is *NOT* NULL, valid vm_file and vm_pgoff is index in file
>     - private /dev/zero mapping VMA
>
I have posted v2 to fix it in a safe way. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250111034511.2223353-1-liushixin2@huawei.com/

Maybe we can also revisit commit bfd40eaff5ab ("mm: fix vma_is_anonymous() false-positives") and fix it by another way?

By the way, it seems we collpase the file even after cow for a private file mapping. Is that so?

Thanks,
>
> .
>



  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-11  3:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-09  7:00 Liu Shixin
2025-01-09 13:40 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-01-10  2:29   ` Liu Shixin
2025-01-09 17:00 ` Yang Shi
2025-01-10  2:08   ` Baolin Wang
2025-01-10  2:32   ` Liu Shixin
2025-01-10  4:31   ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-01-10 18:04     ` Yang Shi
2025-01-10 19:01       ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-01-10 19:40         ` Yang Shi
2025-01-11  3:54           ` Liu Shixin [this message]
2025-01-13 18:51             ` Yang Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cdea5568-a409-0c58-a8b6-1b2875d030e5@huawei.com \
    --to=liushixin2@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox