From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, rppt@kernel.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
mhocko@suse.com
Cc: willy@infradead.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
mingo@kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com,
ying.huang@intel.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, osalvador@suse.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: page_alloc: skip memoryless nodes entirely
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 10:07:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd210991-5038-4ad3-ac03-abb6761c67bd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7928768f2658cd563978f5e5bf8109be1d559320.1697687357.git.zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
On 19.10.23 09:36, Qi Zheng wrote:
> In find_next_best_node(), We skipped the memoryless nodes
> when building the zonelists of other normal nodes (N_NORMAL),
> but did not skip the memoryless node itself when building
> the zonelist. This will cause it to be traversed at runtime.
>
> For example, say we have node0 and node1, node0 is memoryless
> node, then the fallback order of node0 and node1 as follows:
>
> [ 0.153005] Fallback order for Node 0: 0 1
> [ 0.153564] Fallback order for Node 1: 1
>
> After this patch, we skip memoryless node0 entirely, then
> the fallback order of node0 and node1 as follows:
>
> [ 0.155236] Fallback order for Node 0: 1
> [ 0.155806] Fallback order for Node 1: 1
>
> So it becomes completely invisible, which will reduce runtime
> overhead.
>
> And in this way, we will not try to allocate pages from memoryless
> node0, then the panic mentioned in [1] will also be fixed. Even though
> this problem has been solved by dropping the NODE_MIN_SIZE constrain
> in x86 [2], it would be better to fix it in core MM as well.
>
> [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230212110305.93670-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com/
> [2]. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231017062215.171670-1-rppt@kernel.org/
>
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index ee392a324802..e978272699d3 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -5052,8 +5052,11 @@ int find_next_best_node(int node, nodemask_t *used_node_mask)
> int min_val = INT_MAX;
> int best_node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
>
> - /* Use the local node if we haven't already */
> - if (!node_isset(node, *used_node_mask)) {
> + /*
> + * Use the local node if we haven't already. But for memoryless local
> + * node, we should skip it and fallback to other nodes.
> + */
> + if (!node_isset(node, *used_node_mask) && node_state(node, N_MEMORY)) {
> node_set(node, *used_node_mask);
> return node;
> }
Makes sense to me; I suspect that online_pages() will just to the right
thing and call build_all_zonelists() to fix it up.
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-19 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-19 7:36 [PATCH v2 0/2] handle memoryless nodes more appropriately Qi Zheng
2023-10-19 7:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: page_alloc: skip memoryless nodes entirely Qi Zheng
2023-10-19 8:07 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2023-10-19 8:21 ` Qi Zheng
2023-10-19 7:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: memory_hotplug: drop memoryless node from fallback lists Qi Zheng
2023-10-19 8:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-10-19 8:22 ` Qi Zheng
2023-10-19 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] handle memoryless nodes more appropriately David Hildenbrand
2023-10-19 8:17 ` Qi Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cd210991-5038-4ad3-ac03-abb6761c67bd@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox