Re: Migrate (from, to) or (to, from)?

[David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>]

On 07.05.21 15:31, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> 
> A survey:
> 
> include/linux/page_owner.h:static inline void copy_page_owner(struct page *oldpage, struct page *newpage)
> 
> mm/migration.c:
> void remove_migration_ptes(struct page *old, struct page *new, bool locked)
> int migrate_page_move_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
>                  struct page *newpage, struct page *page, int extra_count)
> int migrate_huge_page_move_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
>                                     struct page *newpage, struct page *page)
> void migrate_page_states(struct page *newpage, struct page *page)
> void migrate_page_copy(struct page *newpage, struct page *page)
> int migrate_page(struct address_space *mapping,
>                  struct page *newpage, struct page *page,
>                  enum migrate_mode mode)
> int buffer_migrate_page(struct address_space *mapping,
>                  struct page *newpage, struct page *page, enum migrate_mode mode)
> int buffer_migrate_page_norefs(struct address_space *mapping,
>                  struct page *newpage, struct page *page, enum migrate_mode mode)
> 
>                  rc = mapping->a_ops->migratepage(mapping, newpage,
>                                                  page, mode);
> 
> That's a pretty clear preference for (to, from), so I'm going to change
> copy_page_owner() when I convert it to folio_copy_owner().  And I'll
> fix remove_migration_ptes() when i convert that to folios.

IMHO, memcpy() semantics make most sense. So I agree.

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb