From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E33C02192 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:50:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 612E56B0095; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 12:50:25 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 5C2BD6B0096; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 12:50:25 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 4B1B2280001; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 12:50:25 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0010.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.10]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC296B0095 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 12:50:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin02.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33BA1C6AFF for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:50:24 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 83086630368.02.B7AA0E1 Received: from linux.microsoft.com (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182]) by imf03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A8AD20004 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:50:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf03.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux.microsoft.com header.s=default header.b=HrtU79ev; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=linux.microsoft.com; spf=pass (imf03.hostedemail.com: domain of hamzamahfooz@linux.microsoft.com designates 13.77.154.182 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hamzamahfooz@linux.microsoft.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1738777823; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=bbdKymwhd7iLBGlC1awkgviH8+f+a3AWcAfg+Su5QAhAmnu79nqH4QGptJEN992/9aDQr5 LiVzV1PFf8mb3YCPEMNCukfWRYjRJdPmYtuhB3cnzl2RYrAjOjfB2Sfdn9vfRQT2MTEIFh BxWjtCXH5GXbk5eDGQ659rZ19OD1pEI= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf03.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux.microsoft.com header.s=default header.b=HrtU79ev; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=linux.microsoft.com; spf=pass (imf03.hostedemail.com: domain of hamzamahfooz@linux.microsoft.com designates 13.77.154.182 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hamzamahfooz@linux.microsoft.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1738777823; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=/QdguPZCzgq21lnkBKomUMawlFCJW7ToZuaOaJesVug=; b=UMp9E9xqxj8yJ7PeyYR/kac7ljaCwh/Ix+fvTL8kLwiOOsr/RgvSYbxrjsI54Tyf4T+ZAs GEuehbFYaxV/5HjlJeGFnkjqYmTnVW9sMhh4MPdZVnh7Y+3+z6DHsF6EZi98JCTnYG/vsU 2AKsAvJKyibOabMZjYh/x0lCSytr+NM= Received: from [192.168.2.246] (bras-base-toroon4332w-grc-32-142-114-216-132.dsl.bell.ca [142.114.216.132]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08B45203719A; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 09:50:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 08B45203719A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1738777820; bh=/QdguPZCzgq21lnkBKomUMawlFCJW7ToZuaOaJesVug=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=HrtU79ev3S6VNI+UDLf9dMlKMVFtAFwBX6Kz/ljPAMBJWWoN4oGWPym4ZZCDlXub/ stHL5KYAFfNfcHWK45Ue1u5Pr1ThnA4bXOVv2qyIB+IffDaF3mBVLtCw5SG+2flK2Q wKXThpc02bjtdZURzbMA/sRqrciCjoVpKz2I0480= Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 12:50:19 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: A path forward to cleaning up dying cgroups? To: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: Roman Gushchin , Johannes Weiner , Shakeel Butt , Andrew Morton , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , =?UTF-8?Q?Michal_Koutn=C3=BD?= , Michal Hocko , Muchun Song , Allen Pais , Yosry Ahmed References: Content-Language: en-US From: Hamza Mahfooz In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1A8AD20004 X-Stat-Signature: 33joq8j8u56b3cyjiz1c8p9r8ojyt7bg X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1738777822-692593 X-HE-Meta: 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 +HjGfC6q yTstokXJgEOk23NxGiaNCKjzQdy0oo0NfrzWTKVeLBbLq+yTqln6ZEGLNJM1Vz4QR5SF/lU8cZR7plolqz0s/LEhxwAKdur3zW5Ui02Lr7Fae1VMiWKxLZvZTWKK8chC/RnhZbqdE+7N8CT5+LbeNvY7vmdILKsjXmYThA+UUZ4GxAo0uL6jh5nXi1bxTVZujy3gUjkTM7nMELP7ip8jNx7hcS52UyWZ2U2/jCQw1p80ELYM1A7dzW1MKZKPzngHJ7SY3LpzY7MajbNG0DLjVdfxT0C2+ZYgNEyKYFghjEGORKvNYCku/CmbfdtvaIol3vTHJC9xsaoiYRYrPml0q1cCNdC8mlXNAeUv0p9Po0+URhdGeeifxaIuGH0XZAr91TSMQHEqtUm7nRMawN5z9vDU9jWQ92XhsBH/kyR+7aDtlun9WZVSGhVioJOpSYwsBLQhy7LXwreEPaOo/JokfpODiVA== X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.034185, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Cc: Shakeel Butt On 2/5/25 12:48, Hamza Mahfooz wrote: > I was just curious as to what the status of the issue described in [1] > is. It appears that the last time someone took a stab at it was in [2]. > > Though it seems like there has been relative silence regarding it since > then. So, has there been any discussion regarding the issue since then > and does anyone know if there is consensus on how we should go about > resolving this issue within the kernel? > > BR, > Hamza > > [1] https://lwn.net/Articles/895431/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220621125658.64935-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com/