linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
To: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: david@redhat.com, hughd@google.com, willy@infradead.org,
	vbabka@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rppt@kernel.org,
	vishal.moola@gmail.com, peterx@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
	christophe.leroy2@cs-soprasteria.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/13] mm: page_vma_mapped_walk: map_pte() use pte_offset_map_rw_nolock()
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 16:33:52 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cccc53fc-29c2-43c0-83d4-d330bade70c7@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E2AAD3DA-4C73-4785-939C-13164FA8543D@linux.dev>



On 2024/9/24 16:25, Muchun Song wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Sep 24, 2024, at 14:11, Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> wrote:
>>
>> In the caller of map_pte(), we may modify the pvmw->pte after acquiring
>> the pvmw->ptl, so convert it to using pte_offset_map_rw_nolock(). At
>> this time, the pte_same() check is not performed after the pvmw->ptl held,
>> so we should get pmdval and do pmd_same() check to ensure the stability of
>> pvmw->pmd.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
>> ---
>> mm/page_vma_mapped.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/page_vma_mapped.c b/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
>> index ae5cc42aa2087..6410f29b37c1b 100644
>> --- a/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
>> +++ b/mm/page_vma_mapped.c
>> @@ -13,9 +13,11 @@ static inline bool not_found(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw)
>>     return false;
>> }
>>
>> -static bool map_pte(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, spinlock_t **ptlp)
>> +static bool map_pte(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, pmd_t *pmdvalp,
>> +            spinlock_t **ptlp)
>> {
>>     pte_t ptent;
>> +    pmd_t pmdval;
> 
> Why declare a new variable? Can’t we use *pmdvalp instead?

It's just a coding habit, both are fine for me.

> 
>>
>>     if (pvmw->flags & PVMW_SYNC) {
>>         /* Use the stricter lookup */
>> @@ -25,6 +27,7 @@ static bool map_pte(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, spinlock_t **ptlp)
>>         return !!pvmw->pte;
>>     }
>>
>> +again:
>>     /*
>>      * It is important to return the ptl corresponding to pte,
>>      * in case *pvmw->pmd changes underneath us; so we need to
>> @@ -32,10 +35,11 @@ static bool map_pte(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, spinlock_t **ptlp)
>>      * proceeds to loop over next ptes, and finds a match later.
>>      * Though, in most cases, page lock already protects this.
>>      */
>> -    pvmw->pte = pte_offset_map_nolock(pvmw->vma->vm_mm, pvmw->pmd,
>> -                      pvmw->address, ptlp);
>> +    pvmw->pte = pte_offset_map_rw_nolock(pvmw->vma->vm_mm, pvmw->pmd,
>> +                         pvmw->address, &pmdval, ptlp);
>>     if (!pvmw->pte)
>>         return false;
>> +    *pmdvalp = pmdval;
>>
>>     ptent = ptep_get(pvmw->pte);
>>
>> @@ -67,8 +71,13 @@ static bool map_pte(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw, spinlock_t **ptlp)
>>     } else if (!pte_present(ptent)) {
>>         return false;
>>     }
>> +    spin_lock(*ptlp);
>> +    if (unlikely(!pmd_same(pmdval, pmdp_get_lockless(pvmw->pmd)))) {
>> +        pte_unmap_unlock(pvmw->pte, *ptlp);
>> +        goto again;
>> +    }
>>     pvmw->ptl = *ptlp;
>> -    spin_lock(pvmw->ptl);
>> +
>>     return true;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -278,7 +287,7 @@ bool page_vma_mapped_walk(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw)
>>             step_forward(pvmw, PMD_SIZE);
>>             continue;
>>         }
>> -        if (!map_pte(pvmw, &ptl)) {
>> +        if (!map_pte(pvmw, &pmde, &ptl)) {
>>             if (!pvmw->pte)
>>                 goto restart;
>>             goto next_pte;
>> @@ -307,6 +316,12 @@ bool page_vma_mapped_walk(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw)
>>         if (!pvmw->ptl) {
>>             pvmw->ptl = ptl;
>>             spin_lock(pvmw->ptl);
>> +            if (unlikely(!pmd_same(pmde, pmdp_get_lockless(pvmw->pmd)))) {
>> +                pte_unmap_unlock(pvmw->pte, pvmw->ptl);
>> +                pvmw->ptl = NULL;
>> +                pvmw->pte = NULL;
>> +                goto restart;
>> +            }
>>         }
>>         goto this_pte;
>>     } while (pvmw->address < end);
>> --
>> 2.20.1
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-24  8:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-24  6:09 [PATCH v4 00/13] introduce pte_offset_map_{ro|rw}_nolock() Qi Zheng
2024-09-24  6:09 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] mm: pgtable: " Qi Zheng
2024-09-24  6:24   ` Muchun Song
2024-09-24 12:58   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-24  6:09 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] powerpc: assert_pte_locked() use pte_offset_map_ro_nolock() Qi Zheng
2024-09-24  6:09 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] mm: filemap: filemap_fault_recheck_pte_none() " Qi Zheng
2024-09-24  6:09 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] mm: khugepaged: __collapse_huge_page_swapin() " Qi Zheng
2024-09-24  6:09 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] arm: adjust_pte() use pte_offset_map_rw_nolock() Qi Zheng
2024-09-24  6:09 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] mm: handle_pte_fault() " Qi Zheng
2024-09-24  6:09 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] mm: khugepaged: collapse_pte_mapped_thp() " Qi Zheng
2024-09-24  7:14   ` Muchun Song
2024-09-24  7:29     ` Qi Zheng
2024-09-24  8:52       ` Muchun Song
2024-09-24  8:57         ` Qi Zheng
2024-09-24  9:03           ` Muchun Song
2024-09-24  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] mm: copy_pte_range() " Qi Zheng
2024-09-24  7:35   ` Muchun Song
2024-09-24  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] mm: mremap: move_ptes() " Qi Zheng
2024-09-24  7:39   ` Muchun Song
2024-09-24  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] mm: page_vma_mapped_walk: map_pte() " Qi Zheng
2024-09-24  8:25   ` Muchun Song
2024-09-24  8:33     ` Qi Zheng [this message]
2024-09-24  8:39       ` Muchun Song
2024-09-24  8:45         ` Qi Zheng
2024-09-24  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] mm: userfaultfd: move_pages_pte() " Qi Zheng
2024-09-24  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] mm: multi-gen LRU: walk_pte_range() " Qi Zheng
2024-09-24 14:39   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-24  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] mm: pgtable: remove pte_offset_map_nolock() Qi Zheng
2024-09-24 13:02   ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cccc53fc-29c2-43c0-83d4-d330bade70c7@bytedance.com \
    --to=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy2@cs-soprasteria.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox