From: Maciej Wieczor-Retman <m.wieczorretman@pm.me>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] kasan: Unpoison vms[area] addresses with a common tag
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2025 11:13:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc4xh64s47ftujtp76hizmjqaczbgpzvmpbtzjtya2tuqyc75x@3obiajea2eem> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+fCnZdUMTQNq=hgn8KbNwv2+LsRqoZ_R0CK0uWnjB41nHzvyg@mail.gmail.com>
On 2025-11-05 at 02:13:22 +0100, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 4, 2025 at 3:49 PM Maciej Wieczor-Retman
><m.wieczorretman@pm.me> wrote:
>>
>> From: Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>
>>
>> A KASAN tag mismatch, possibly causing a kernel panic, can be observed
>> on systems with a tag-based KASAN enabled and with multiple NUMA nodes.
>> It was reported on arm64 and reproduced on x86. It can be explained in
>> the following points:
>>
>> 1. There can be more than one virtual memory chunk.
>> 2. Chunk's base address has a tag.
>> 3. The base address points at the first chunk and thus inherits
>> the tag of the first chunk.
>> 4. The subsequent chunks will be accessed with the tag from the
>> first chunk.
>> 5. Thus, the subsequent chunks need to have their tag set to
>> match that of the first chunk.
>>
>> Unpoison all vm_structs after allocating them for the percpu allocator.
>> Use the same tag to resolve the pcpu chunk address mismatch.
>>
>> Fixes: 1d96320f8d53 ("kasan, vmalloc: add vmalloc tagging for SW_TAGS")
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.1+
>> Signed-off-by: Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>
>> Tested-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> Changelog v1 (after splitting of from the KASAN series):
>> - Rewrite the patch message to point at the user impact of the issue.
>> - Move helper to common.c so it can be compiled in all KASAN modes.
>>
>> mm/kasan/common.c | 10 +++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/kasan/common.c b/mm/kasan/common.c
>> index c63544a98c24..a6bbc68984cd 100644
>> --- a/mm/kasan/common.c
>> +++ b/mm/kasan/common.c
>> @@ -584,12 +584,20 @@ bool __kasan_check_byte(const void *address, unsigned long ip)
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * A tag mismatch happens when calculating per-cpu chunk addresses, because
>> + * they all inherit the tag from vms[0]->addr, even when nr_vms is bigger
>> + * than 1. This is a problem because all the vms[]->addr come from separate
>> + * allocations and have different tags so while the calculated address is
>> + * correct the tag isn't.
>> + */
>> void __kasan_unpoison_vmap_areas(struct vm_struct **vms, int nr_vms)
>> {
>> int area;
>>
>> for (area = 0 ; area < nr_vms ; area++) {
>> kasan_poison(vms[area]->addr, vms[area]->size,
>> - arch_kasan_get_tag(vms[area]->addr), false);
>> + arch_kasan_get_tag(vms[0]->addr), false);
>> + arch_kasan_set_tag(vms[area]->addr, arch_kasan_get_tag(vms[0]->addr));
>
>set_tag() does not set the tag in place, its return value needs to be assigned.
Right, not sure how I missed that
>
>So if this patch fixes the issue, there's something off (is
>vms[area]->addr never used for area != 0)?
Maybe there is something off with my tests then. I'll try to run them in a
couple of different environments.
--
Kind regards
Maciej Wieczór-Retman
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-05 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-04 14:48 [PATCH v1 0/2] kasan: vmalloc: Fix incorrect tag assignment with multiple vm_structs Maciej Wieczor-Retman
2025-11-04 14:49 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] kasan: Unpoison pcpu chunks with base address tag Maciej Wieczor-Retman
2025-11-05 1:12 ` Andrey Konovalov
2025-11-05 10:39 ` Maciej Wieczor-Retman
2025-11-05 4:20 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-05 22:00 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-06 15:00 ` Maciej Wieczór-Retman
2025-11-06 1:42 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-04 14:49 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] kasan: Unpoison vms[area] addresses with a common tag Maciej Wieczor-Retman
2025-11-05 1:13 ` Andrey Konovalov
2025-11-05 11:13 ` Maciej Wieczor-Retman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cc4xh64s47ftujtp76hizmjqaczbgpzvmpbtzjtya2tuqyc75x@3obiajea2eem \
--to=m.wieczorretman@pm.me \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox