From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] x86/mm: make sure LAM is up-to-date during context switching
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 20:18:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cbxzo4e3zkr5pxxr4e2hualiucqudsizr2bmxgh3rr7yagcazd@fer5qemogcls> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <35b670e2-9ef5-4d3a-b6ea-f8016dfa088d@intel.com>
On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 07:23:58AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 3/7/24 17:34, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> Fix this by making sure we write a new CR3 if LAM is not
> >> up-to-date. No problems were observed in practice, this was found
> >> by code inspection.
> > I think it should be fixed with a much bigger hammer: explicit IPIs.
> > Just don't ever let it get out of date, like install_ldt().
> I guess it matters whether the thing that matters is having a persistent
> inconsistency or a temporary one. IPIs will definitely turn a permanent
> one into a temporary one.
>
> But this is all easier to reason about if we can get rid of even the
> temporary inconsistency.
>
> Wouldn't this be even simpler than IPIs?
>
> static inline unsigned long set_tlbstate_lam_mode(struct mm_struct *mm)
> {
> unsigned long lam = READ_ONCE(mm->context.lam_cr3_mask);
>
> + /* LAM is for userspace only. Ignore it for kernel threads: */
> + if (tsk->flags & PF_KTHREAD)
> + return 0;
I like this approach. kthread_use_mm() WARNs if it called for
non-PF_KTHREAD task, so it should be okay.
I was worried that it would also exclude io_uring, but worker threads
don't have the flag set.
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-08 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-07 13:39 [RFC PATCH 0/3] x86/mm: LAM fixups and cleanups Yosry Ahmed
2024-03-07 13:39 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] x86/mm: fix LAM cr3 mask inconsistency during context switch Yosry Ahmed
2024-03-07 17:22 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-03-07 20:31 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-03-07 17:36 ` Dave Hansen
2024-03-07 18:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-03-07 20:44 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-03-07 22:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-03-07 20:42 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-03-07 23:21 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-03-07 23:32 ` Dave Hansen
2024-03-07 23:37 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-03-07 13:39 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] x86/mm: make sure LAM is up-to-date during context switching Yosry Ahmed
2024-03-07 15:29 ` Dave Hansen
2024-03-07 21:04 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-03-07 21:39 ` Dave Hansen
2024-03-07 22:29 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-03-07 22:41 ` Dave Hansen
2024-03-07 22:44 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-03-08 1:26 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-03-08 8:09 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-03-07 17:29 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-03-07 17:56 ` Dave Hansen
2024-03-07 21:08 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-03-07 21:48 ` Dave Hansen
2024-03-07 22:30 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-03-08 1:34 ` Andy Lutomirski
2024-03-08 1:47 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-03-08 14:05 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-03-08 15:23 ` Dave Hansen
2024-03-08 18:18 ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2024-03-09 2:19 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-03-09 16:34 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-03-09 21:37 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-03-11 12:42 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-03-11 18:27 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-03-07 13:39 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] x86/mm: cleanup prctl_enable_tagged_addr() nr_bits error checking Yosry Ahmed
2024-03-07 17:31 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-03-07 20:27 ` Yosry Ahmed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cbxzo4e3zkr5pxxr4e2hualiucqudsizr2bmxgh3rr7yagcazd@fer5qemogcls \
--to=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox