linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Colin King (gmail)" <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] mm/mincore: improve performance by adding an unlikely hint
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 14:16:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cbb812ea-4585-4777-aaae-3dcdcd0bd8d9@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250217191351.0003a6f07d017d80762fae41@linux-foundation.org>


[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2221 bytes --]

On 18/02/2025 03:13, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 18:00:22 +0000 "Colin King (gmail)" <colin.i.king@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> fOn 17/02/2025 17:58, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 05:09:34PM +0000, Colin Ian King wrote:
>>>> Adding an unlikely() hint on the masked start comparison error
>>>> return path improves run-time performance of the mincore system call.
>>>>
>>>> Benchmarking on an i9-12900 shows an improvement of 7ns on mincore calls
>>>> on a 256KB mmap'd region where 50% of the pages we resident.
>>>>
>>>> Results based on running 20 tests with turbo disabled (to reduce
>>>> clock freq turbo changes), with 10 second run per test and comparing
>>>> the number of mincores calls per second. The % standard deviation of
>>>> the 20 tests was ~0.10%, so results are reliable.
>>>
>>> I think you've elided _just_ enough information here that nobody can
>>> judge whether your stats skills are any good ;-)  You've told us 7ns
>>> (per call, presumably) and you've told us 0.10% standard deviation,
>>> but you haven't told us how long the syscall takes, so nobody can tell
>>> whether 7ns is within 0.10% or not ;-)
>>
>> Ugh, my bad.
>>
>> Improvement was from ~970 down to 963 ns, so small ~0.7% improvement.
>>
> 
> It actually doesn't change the generated code:

I've compare the generated x86 object code using gcc 14.2.1 20240912 
(Fedora 41) and 14.2.0 (Debian 14.2.0-17), 14.2.1 20250211 (Clear Linux) 
and I get differences in the generated object code comparing old and 
new, and the improvement on ClearLinux is more significant too because 
it uses -O3. So I'm confident the change is generating improved object code.


> 
> hp2:/usr/src/25> diff -u mm/mincore.lst.old mm/mincore.lst
> --- mm/mincore.lst.old	2025-02-17 19:11:34.093727411 -0800
> +++ mm/mincore.lst	2025-02-17 19:12:59.797009056 -0800
> @@ -1563,7 +1563,7 @@
>   	start = untagged_addr(start);
>   
>   	/* Check the start address: needs to be page-aligned.. */
> -	if (start & ~PAGE_MASK)
> +	if (unlikely(start & ~PAGE_MASK))
>        b27:	31 ff                	xor    %edi,%edi
>   	asm (ALTERNATIVE("",
>        b29:	90                   	nop


[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 4901 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 840 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-18 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-17 17:09 Colin Ian King
2025-02-17 17:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-02-17 18:00   ` Colin King (gmail)
2025-02-18  3:13     ` Andrew Morton
2025-02-18 14:16       ` Colin King (gmail) [this message]
2025-02-19  0:08         ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cbb812ea-4585-4777-aaae-3dcdcd0bd8d9@gmail.com \
    --to=colin.i.king@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox