From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: jirislaby@kernel.org, jacobly.alt@gmail.com,
holger@applied-asynchrony.com, hdegoede@redhat.com,
michel@lespinasse.org, jglisse@google.com, mhocko@suse.com,
vbabka@suse.cz, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
dave@stgolabs.net, willy@infradead.org, liam.howlett@oracle.com,
peterz@infradead.org, ldufour@linux.ibm.com, paulmck@kernel.org,
mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org, luto@kernel.org,
songliubraving@fb.com, peterx@redhat.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
hughd@google.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
kent.overstreet@linux.dev, punit.agrawal@bytedance.com,
lstoakes@gmail.com, peterjung1337@gmail.com, rientjes@google.com,
chriscli@google.com, axelrasmussen@google.com, joelaf@google.com,
minchan@google.com, rppt@kernel.org, jannh@google.com,
shakeelb@google.com, tatashin@google.com, edumazet@google.com,
gthelen@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] fork: lock VMAs of the parent process when forking
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 15:20:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cab1b506-1f77-0532-f606-4fd4165d307c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230706011400.2949242-2-surenb@google.com>
On 06.07.23 03:13, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> When forking a child process, parent write-protects an anonymous page
> and COW-shares it with the child being forked using copy_present_pte().
> Parent's TLB is flushed right before we drop the parent's mmap_lock in
> dup_mmap(). If we get a write-fault before that TLB flush in the parent,
> and we end up replacing that anonymous page in the parent process in
> do_wp_page() (because, COW-shared with the child), this might lead to
> some stale writable TLB entries targeting the wrong (old) page.
> Similar issue happened in the past with userfaultfd (see flush_tlb_page()
> call inside do_wp_page()).
> Lock VMAs of the parent process when forking a child, which prevents
> concurrent page faults during fork operation and avoids this issue.
> This fix can potentially regress some fork-heavy workloads. Kernel build
> time did not show noticeable regression on a 56-core machine while a
> stress test mapping 10000 VMAs and forking 5000 times in a tight loop
> shows ~7% regression. If such fork time regression is unacceptable,
> disabling CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK should restore its performance. Further
> optimizations are possible if this regression proves to be problematic.
>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/dbdef34c-3a07-5951-e1ae-e9c6e3cdf51b@kernel.org/
> Reported-by: Holger Hoffstätte <holger@applied-asynchrony.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/b198d649-f4bf-b971-31d0-e8433ec2a34c@applied-asynchrony.com/
> Reported-by: Jacob Young <jacobly.alt@gmail.com>
> Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217624
> Fixes: 0bff0aaea03e ("x86/mm: try VMA lock-based page fault handling first")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Feel free to keep my ACK on minor changes.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-06 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-06 1:13 [PATCH v4 0/2] Avoid memory corruption caused by per-VMA locks Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-07-06 1:13 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] fork: lock VMAs of the parent process when forking Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-07-06 13:18 ` Liam R. Howlett
2023-07-06 13:20 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2023-07-06 1:14 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] mm: disable CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK until its fixed Suren Baghdasaryan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cab1b506-1f77-0532-f606-4fd4165d307c@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=chriscli@google.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=holger@applied-asynchrony.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jacobly.alt@gmail.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jglisse@google.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=michel@lespinasse.org \
--cc=minchan@google.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterjung1337@gmail.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=punit.agrawal@bytedance.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tatashin@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox